The Effect of Assisted Reproductive Technologies on Human Sex Ratios.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Ektoras X Georgiou, Yossi Mizrachi, Rebecca Kelley, Sharyn Stock-Myer, John Stevens, David K Gardner, Alex Polyakov
{"title":"The Effect of Assisted Reproductive Technologies on Human Sex Ratios.","authors":"Ektoras X Georgiou, Yossi Mizrachi, Rebecca Kelley, Sharyn Stock-Myer, John Stevens, David K Gardner, Alex Polyakov","doi":"10.1111/ajo.13940","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Modern assisted reproductive technology (ART), including pre-implantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A), has opened new avenues in understanding early embryonic events and has simultaneously raised questions about the impact of ART itself on sex ratios.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The primary aim was to investigate whether patient demographic characteristics, ovarian stimulation protocols or laboratory characteristics in ART influence sex ratios. The secondary aim was to relate the blastocyst sex ratio (BSR) to the corresponding secondary sex ratio (SSR) in our patient cohort.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We conducted a retrospective single-centre cohort study on consecutive PGT-A cycles from January 2019 to February 2022. We analysed demographic data, stimulation protocols, laboratory characteristics and pregnancy outcomes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The euploidy rate was 45.1% (2608/5777), BSR 1.07 and euploid BSR 1.03. There was no statistical difference in the ploidy status of XX and XY blastocysts and on multivariate logistic regression analysis, there was no association between euploidy and BSR or any other variables examined, including female age and stimulation protocol. The SSR was 1.02 (1294 embryo transfers) with no statistical difference in biochemical pregnancy (p = 0.41), clinical pregnancy (p = 0.56), miscarriage (p = 0.65) or live birth rates (p = 0.40) based on embryo sex.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our study indicates that the euploid BSR is not skewed by sex, and there is no relationship between BSR and euploidy, patient characteristics or stimulation protocols. Pregnancy outcomes did not vary by sex, and the SSR was consistent with the SSR of the general Australian population at birth.</p>","PeriodicalId":55429,"journal":{"name":"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics & Gynaecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/ajo.13940","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Modern assisted reproductive technology (ART), including pre-implantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A), has opened new avenues in understanding early embryonic events and has simultaneously raised questions about the impact of ART itself on sex ratios.

Aims: The primary aim was to investigate whether patient demographic characteristics, ovarian stimulation protocols or laboratory characteristics in ART influence sex ratios. The secondary aim was to relate the blastocyst sex ratio (BSR) to the corresponding secondary sex ratio (SSR) in our patient cohort.

Materials and methods: We conducted a retrospective single-centre cohort study on consecutive PGT-A cycles from January 2019 to February 2022. We analysed demographic data, stimulation protocols, laboratory characteristics and pregnancy outcomes.

Results: The euploidy rate was 45.1% (2608/5777), BSR 1.07 and euploid BSR 1.03. There was no statistical difference in the ploidy status of XX and XY blastocysts and on multivariate logistic regression analysis, there was no association between euploidy and BSR or any other variables examined, including female age and stimulation protocol. The SSR was 1.02 (1294 embryo transfers) with no statistical difference in biochemical pregnancy (p = 0.41), clinical pregnancy (p = 0.56), miscarriage (p = 0.65) or live birth rates (p = 0.40) based on embryo sex.

Conclusions: Our study indicates that the euploid BSR is not skewed by sex, and there is no relationship between BSR and euploidy, patient characteristics or stimulation protocols. Pregnancy outcomes did not vary by sex, and the SSR was consistent with the SSR of the general Australian population at birth.

辅助生殖技术对人类性别比的影响。
背景:现代辅助生殖技术(ART),包括非整倍体植入前基因检测(PGT-A),为理解早期胚胎事件开辟了新的途径,同时也提出了ART本身对性别比例影响的问题。目的:主要目的是调查患者人口统计学特征、卵巢刺激方案或ART的实验室特征是否影响性别比。第二个目的是在我们的患者队列中,将囊胚性比(BSR)与相应的第二性比(SSR)联系起来。材料和方法:我们对2019年1月至2022年2月的连续PGT-A周期进行了回顾性单中心队列研究。我们分析了人口统计数据、刺激方案、实验室特征和妊娠结局。结果:整倍性为45.1% (2608/5777),BSR为1.07,整倍体BSR为1.03。XX和XY囊胚的倍性状态无统计学差异,多因素logistic回归分析显示,整倍性与BSR或任何其他变量(包括女性年龄和刺激方案)均无相关性。SSR为1.02(1294例),不同胚胎性别的生化妊娠率(p = 0.41)、临床妊娠率(p = 0.56)、流产率(p = 0.65)和活产率(p = 0.40)差异无统计学意义。结论:我们的研究表明,整倍体BSR不受性别的影响,BSR与整倍体、患者特征或刺激方案之间没有关系。妊娠结局不因性别而异,SSR与出生时澳大利亚一般人群的SSR一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.40
自引率
11.80%
发文量
165
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Australian and New Zealand Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology (ANZJOG) is an editorially independent publication owned by the Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RANZCOG) and the RANZCOG Research foundation. ANZJOG aims to provide a medium for the publication of original contributions to clinical practice and/or research in all fields of obstetrics and gynaecology and related disciplines. Articles are peer reviewed by clinicians or researchers expert in the field of the submitted work. From time to time the journal will also publish printed abstracts from the RANZCOG Annual Scientific Meeting and meetings of relevant special interest groups, where the accepted abstracts have undergone the journals peer review acceptance process.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信