Increased Risk of Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement After Prior Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement with Concomitant Valve Disease.

IF 3.6 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Robert B Hawkins, Barbara C S Hamilton, Devraj Sukul, G Michael Deeb, Gorav Ailawadi, Shinichi Fukuhara
{"title":"Increased Risk of Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement After Prior Transcatheter Versus Surgical Aortic Valve Replacement with Concomitant Valve Disease.","authors":"Robert B Hawkins, Barbara C S Hamilton, Devraj Sukul, G Michael Deeb, Gorav Ailawadi, Shinichi Fukuhara","doi":"10.1016/j.athoracsur.2025.01.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The etiology of increased risk for reoperation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) versus prior surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) is poorly understood. This study evaluated the impact of concomitant mitral and tricuspid valve disease on associated risk of TAVR explant.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients undergoing aortic valve replacement after prior SAVR or TAVR were extracted from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database (2011-2021). Patients were stratified by TAVR explant status and presence of severe concomitant valve disease for analyses. Risk adjustment was performed using multivariable logistic regression. Interaction terms were utilized to evaluate differential risk of concomitant valve disease for TAVR explant versus redo-SAVR.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 24,097 redo aortic valve replacement patients, 877 (3.6%) underwent TAVR explant. TAVR explant patients had higher rates of concomitant severe valve disease (17% vs 14%, p<0.001). Patients with severe concomitant valve disease had worse operative mortality after TAVR explant (26.2% vs 14.6%, p<0.001) and redo-SAVR (12.3% vs 6.9%, p<0.001). TAVR explant was independently associated with higher mortality (OR<sub>adj</sub> 1.3 [1.0-1.6], p=0.030). Severe mitral regurgitation (OR<sub>adj</sub> 1.2 [1.0-1.6], p=0.017), mitral stenosis (OR<sub>adj</sub> 2.0 [1.5-2.7, p<0.001), and tricuspid regurgitation (OR<sub>adj</sub> 1.6 [1.3-1.9], p<0.001) were all associated with mortality, although these factors were not associated with disproportionately higher risk during TAVR explant (p>0.05).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>TAVR explant cases have a higher burden of severe concomitant valve disease than redo-SAVR cases. Heart teams should consider these findings when discussing initial procedure choices for patients with multi-valve disease given their extreme risk at time of TAVR explant.</p>","PeriodicalId":50976,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Thoracic Surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Thoracic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.athoracsur.2025.01.005","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The etiology of increased risk for reoperation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) versus prior surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) is poorly understood. This study evaluated the impact of concomitant mitral and tricuspid valve disease on associated risk of TAVR explant.

Methods: Patients undergoing aortic valve replacement after prior SAVR or TAVR were extracted from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons Adult Cardiac Surgery Database (2011-2021). Patients were stratified by TAVR explant status and presence of severe concomitant valve disease for analyses. Risk adjustment was performed using multivariable logistic regression. Interaction terms were utilized to evaluate differential risk of concomitant valve disease for TAVR explant versus redo-SAVR.

Results: Of 24,097 redo aortic valve replacement patients, 877 (3.6%) underwent TAVR explant. TAVR explant patients had higher rates of concomitant severe valve disease (17% vs 14%, p<0.001). Patients with severe concomitant valve disease had worse operative mortality after TAVR explant (26.2% vs 14.6%, p<0.001) and redo-SAVR (12.3% vs 6.9%, p<0.001). TAVR explant was independently associated with higher mortality (ORadj 1.3 [1.0-1.6], p=0.030). Severe mitral regurgitation (ORadj 1.2 [1.0-1.6], p=0.017), mitral stenosis (ORadj 2.0 [1.5-2.7, p<0.001), and tricuspid regurgitation (ORadj 1.6 [1.3-1.9], p<0.001) were all associated with mortality, although these factors were not associated with disproportionately higher risk during TAVR explant (p>0.05).

Conclusions: TAVR explant cases have a higher burden of severe concomitant valve disease than redo-SAVR cases. Heart teams should consider these findings when discussing initial procedure choices for patients with multi-valve disease given their extreme risk at time of TAVR explant.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Annals of Thoracic Surgery
Annals of Thoracic Surgery 医学-呼吸系统
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
13.00%
发文量
1235
审稿时长
42 days
期刊介绍: The mission of The Annals of Thoracic Surgery is to promote scholarship in cardiothoracic surgery patient care, clinical practice, research, education, and policy. As the official journal of two of the largest American associations in its specialty, this leading monthly enjoys outstanding editorial leadership and maintains rigorous selection standards. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery features: • Full-length original articles on clinical advances, current surgical methods, and controversial topics and techniques • New Technology articles • Case reports • "How-to-do-it" features • Reviews of current literature • Supplements on symposia • Commentary pieces and correspondence • CME • Online-only case reports, "how-to-do-its", and images in cardiothoracic surgery. An authoritative, clinically oriented, comprehensive resource, The Annals of Thoracic Surgery is committed to providing a place for all thoracic surgeons to relate experiences which will help improve patient care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信