Effect of Pulsed Electromagnetic Field and Microwave Therapy on Pain and Physical Function in Older Adults With Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY
Natalia Comino-Suárez, Pilar Jiménez-Tamurejo, María Ainoa Gutiérrez-Herrera, Javier Aceituno-Gómez, Diego Serrano-Muñoz, Juan Avendaño-Coy
{"title":"Effect of Pulsed Electromagnetic Field and Microwave Therapy on Pain and Physical Function in Older Adults With Knee Osteoarthritis: A Randomized Clinical Trial.","authors":"Natalia Comino-Suárez, Pilar Jiménez-Tamurejo, María Ainoa Gutiérrez-Herrera, Javier Aceituno-Gómez, Diego Serrano-Muñoz, Juan Avendaño-Coy","doi":"10.1519/JPT.0000000000000444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and purpose: </strong>The objective was to examine the adjuvant effect of active pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) versus microwave (MW) therapy, as well as sham PEMF, in addressing pain and improving functionality for treating knee osteoarthritis (KOA).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial. Individuals diagnosed with KOA were assigned to an intervention combining an exercise program (EX) with active PEMF, MW, or sham PEMF. The main outcomes were pain, reported on a visual analogue scale (VAS), and functionality, assessed using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis (WOMAC) questionnaire, and the Timed Up and Go test (TUG). The outcomes were measured preintervention, immediately postintervention, and at 1 and 4 months of follow-up (FU).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty individuals (n = 83 knees) were evaluated. Significant between-group differences were found in WOMAC stiffness (rmMANOVA (F(2,77) = 4.33, P = .017, partial η2 = 0.10)). A notable interaction effect between group and time was found for the WOMAC pain score (rmMANOVA (F(2, 77) = 3.14, P = .049, partial η2 = 0.07)). After 4 months, the PEMF + EX group demonstrated superior pain relief compared to the sham PEMF + EX (WOMAC pain \"mean difference ± standard error between-groups\": -3.2 ± 1.2, P = .028) and MW + EX (VAS pain: -2.1 ± 0.9, P = .042) groups. PEMF + EX perceived less stiffness than did the sham PEMF + EX in both the pre-FU (WOMAC stiffness: -1.6 ± 0.6, P = .047), 1-month FU (-1.7 ± 0.6, P = .015) and 4-month FU (-1.4 ± 0.6, P = .038), with no changes in the MW + EX group. WOMAC function score showed greater improvement in the PEMF + EX group compared to the MW + EX group at 4-month of FU (-9.0 ± 3.6, P = .039). Only PEMF + EX showed a positive effect on the TUG score at 1-month FU (-1.7 ± 0.5, P = <.001) and 4-month of FU (1.9 ± 0.5, P = .020).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The application of PEMF could be a useful adjuvant treatment to exercise programs to further decrease pain and improve knee stiffness and function in individuals with KOA in the medium term compared to MW and sham PEMF.</p>","PeriodicalId":49035,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1519/JPT.0000000000000444","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and purpose: The objective was to examine the adjuvant effect of active pulsed electromagnetic field (PEMF) versus microwave (MW) therapy, as well as sham PEMF, in addressing pain and improving functionality for treating knee osteoarthritis (KOA).

Methods: This was a double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized clinical trial. Individuals diagnosed with KOA were assigned to an intervention combining an exercise program (EX) with active PEMF, MW, or sham PEMF. The main outcomes were pain, reported on a visual analogue scale (VAS), and functionality, assessed using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis (WOMAC) questionnaire, and the Timed Up and Go test (TUG). The outcomes were measured preintervention, immediately postintervention, and at 1 and 4 months of follow-up (FU).

Results: Sixty individuals (n = 83 knees) were evaluated. Significant between-group differences were found in WOMAC stiffness (rmMANOVA (F(2,77) = 4.33, P = .017, partial η2 = 0.10)). A notable interaction effect between group and time was found for the WOMAC pain score (rmMANOVA (F(2, 77) = 3.14, P = .049, partial η2 = 0.07)). After 4 months, the PEMF + EX group demonstrated superior pain relief compared to the sham PEMF + EX (WOMAC pain "mean difference ± standard error between-groups": -3.2 ± 1.2, P = .028) and MW + EX (VAS pain: -2.1 ± 0.9, P = .042) groups. PEMF + EX perceived less stiffness than did the sham PEMF + EX in both the pre-FU (WOMAC stiffness: -1.6 ± 0.6, P = .047), 1-month FU (-1.7 ± 0.6, P = .015) and 4-month FU (-1.4 ± 0.6, P = .038), with no changes in the MW + EX group. WOMAC function score showed greater improvement in the PEMF + EX group compared to the MW + EX group at 4-month of FU (-9.0 ± 3.6, P = .039). Only PEMF + EX showed a positive effect on the TUG score at 1-month FU (-1.7 ± 0.5, P = <.001) and 4-month of FU (1.9 ± 0.5, P = .020).

Conclusions: The application of PEMF could be a useful adjuvant treatment to exercise programs to further decrease pain and improve knee stiffness and function in individuals with KOA in the medium term compared to MW and sham PEMF.

脉冲电磁场和微波治疗对老年膝骨关节炎患者疼痛和身体功能的影响:一项随机临床试验。
背景和目的:目的是研究主动脉冲电磁场(PEMF)与微波(MW)治疗以及假脉冲电磁场在治疗膝关节骨关节炎(KOA)时缓解疼痛和改善功能方面的辅助作用。方法:这是一项双盲、安慰剂对照、随机临床试验。被诊断为KOA的个体被分配到运动计划(EX)与活动PEMF、MW或假PEMF相结合的干预组。主要结果是疼痛,用视觉模拟量表(VAS)报告,功能,用西安大略和麦克马斯特大学关节炎(WOMAC)问卷和计时起床测试(TUG)评估。在干预前、干预后立即以及随访1个月和4个月(FU)时测量结果。结果:对60例患者(n = 83个膝关节)进行评估。WOMAC刚度组间差异显著(rmMANOVA (F(2,77) = 4.33, P = 0.017,偏η2 = 0.10)。WOMAC疼痛评分组与时间之间存在显著的交互作用(rmMANOVA (F(2,77) = 3.14, P = 0.049,偏η2 = 0.07))。4个月后,PEMF + EX组疼痛缓解优于假PEMF + EX组(WOMAC组间疼痛“平均差±标准误差”:-3.2±1.2,P = 0.028)和MW + EX组(VAS疼痛:-2.1±0.9,P = 0.042)。在FU前(WOMAC刚度:-1.6±0.6,P = 0.047)、FU 1个月(-1.7±0.6,P = 0.015)和FU 4个月(-1.4±0.6,P = 0.038), PEMF + EX组的僵硬感均低于假PEMF + EX组,而MW + EX组无变化。在FU治疗4个月时,与MW + EX组相比,PEMF + EX组的WOMAC功能评分改善更大(-9.0±3.6,P = 0.039)。在1个月FU时,只有PEMF + EX对TUG评分有积极影响(-1.7±0.5),P =结论:与MW和假PEMF相比,PEMF的应用可以作为一种有用的辅助治疗方案,在中期进一步减少KOA患者的疼痛,改善膝关节僵硬和功能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy
Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY-REHABILITATION
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.20%
发文量
58
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​Journal of Geriatric Physical Therapy is the leading source of clinically applicable evidence for achieving optimal health, wellness, mobility, and physical function across the continuum of health status for the aging adult. The mission of the Academy of Geriatric Physical Therapy is building a community that advances the profession of physical therapy to optimize the experience of aging.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信