Factors influencing shared decision-making on hospital wards as perceived by healthcare professionals: A qualitative study.

IF 2.7 4区 医学 Q1 NURSING
Applied Nursing Research Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2024-12-20 DOI:10.1016/j.apnr.2024.151892
J Bakker, E M Huntink, L J Peters, I M Brugman, D T Ubbink, L Schoonhoven
{"title":"Factors influencing shared decision-making on hospital wards as perceived by healthcare professionals: A qualitative study.","authors":"J Bakker, E M Huntink, L J Peters, I M Brugman, D T Ubbink, L Schoonhoven","doi":"10.1016/j.apnr.2024.151892","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The extent to which healthcare professionals apply Shared Decision Making (SDM) on hospital wards is still unknown. The aim was to explore the current knowledge of SDM among healthcare professionals and the experienced factors influencing SDM on the wards of Dutch hospitals, regarding both treatment and care decisions.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Twelve hospital wards in two university medical centres and one teaching hospital.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Explorative qualitative design including semi-structured interviews with healthcare professionals working on hospital wards.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>23 Healthcare professionals of 12 different wards were interviewed about their knowledge and the factors influencing SDM on their hospital ward. Most healthcare professionals had heard about SDM, but their understanding of the concept of SDM differed. Influencing factors were found on three levels. Organizational factors: lack of a clear vision, various approaches of ward rounds, time, and the organizational structure. Patient-related factors: the situation of the patient, participation of relatives and perceptual differences. Healthcare professional-related factors: motivation, experience, workload, continuity of care, familiarity with the patient, interprofessional communication, tools, and education.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>All healthcare professionals recognize the importance of SDM and involving the patient in healthcare decisions, because they feel it enhances the quality of care and prioritizes patient-centered care. Nevertheless, healthcare professionals frequently encounter barriers in this setting. To facilitate SDM on hospital wards in the Netherlands, it is beneficial to embed SDM in the inpatient setting and establish a clear structure for interprofessional SDM regarding both treatment and care decisions, in which physicians, nurses and patients play an essential role.</p>","PeriodicalId":50740,"journal":{"name":"Applied Nursing Research","volume":"81 ","pages":"151892"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Nursing Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apnr.2024.151892","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/12/20 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The extent to which healthcare professionals apply Shared Decision Making (SDM) on hospital wards is still unknown. The aim was to explore the current knowledge of SDM among healthcare professionals and the experienced factors influencing SDM on the wards of Dutch hospitals, regarding both treatment and care decisions.

Setting: Twelve hospital wards in two university medical centres and one teaching hospital.

Design: Explorative qualitative design including semi-structured interviews with healthcare professionals working on hospital wards.

Results: 23 Healthcare professionals of 12 different wards were interviewed about their knowledge and the factors influencing SDM on their hospital ward. Most healthcare professionals had heard about SDM, but their understanding of the concept of SDM differed. Influencing factors were found on three levels. Organizational factors: lack of a clear vision, various approaches of ward rounds, time, and the organizational structure. Patient-related factors: the situation of the patient, participation of relatives and perceptual differences. Healthcare professional-related factors: motivation, experience, workload, continuity of care, familiarity with the patient, interprofessional communication, tools, and education.

Conclusion: All healthcare professionals recognize the importance of SDM and involving the patient in healthcare decisions, because they feel it enhances the quality of care and prioritizes patient-centered care. Nevertheless, healthcare professionals frequently encounter barriers in this setting. To facilitate SDM on hospital wards in the Netherlands, it is beneficial to embed SDM in the inpatient setting and establish a clear structure for interprofessional SDM regarding both treatment and care decisions, in which physicians, nurses and patients play an essential role.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Nursing Research
Applied Nursing Research 医学-护理
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
65
审稿时长
70 days
期刊介绍: Applied Nursing Research presents original, peer-reviewed research findings clearly and directly for clinical applications in all nursing specialties. Regular features include "Ask the Experts," research briefs, clinical methods, book reviews, news and announcements, and an editorial section. Applied Nursing Research covers such areas as pain management, patient education, discharge planning, nursing diagnosis, job stress in nursing, nursing influence on length of hospital stay, and nurse/physician collaboration.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信