Effect of different doses of oral olanzapine to prevent postoperative nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic surgery in high-risk patients: A randomised controlled trial.

IF 1.2 Q3 SURGERY
Amani H Abdel-Wahab, Ghada M Abo Elfad, Ahmed Mohamed Aboelfadl, Mustafa Bahloul, Marwa Mahmoud Abdel Rady
{"title":"Effect of different doses of oral olanzapine to prevent postoperative nausea and vomiting after laparoscopic surgery in high-risk patients: A randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Amani H Abdel-Wahab, Ghada M Abo Elfad, Ahmed Mohamed Aboelfadl, Mustafa Bahloul, Marwa Mahmoud Abdel Rady","doi":"10.1177/17504589241308820","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We conducted this study to compare the efficacy of oral 10 and 5 mg olanzapine for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Notably, 135 female patients between the ages of 18 and 50 years, classed as American Society of Anaesthesiologists I and II, who underwent elective laparoscopic gynaecological surgery under general anaesthesia were randomly assigned to one of three groups (45 each) to receive perioperative 5 or 10 mg oral olanzapine (OL5 and OL10 groups), or a placebo (in the control group). Postoperation, we recorded the occurrence and severity of postoperative nausea and vomiting within 24 h, the number of patients who received antiemetics and any associated side effects.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Postoperative nausea was more prevalent in the control group (23 patients) than in OL5 and OL10 groups (13 and three patients, respectively); Group OL10 had the lowest severity of nausea. There was no incidence of vomiting in the OL10 group, and only one patient required antiemetics; in the OL5 group, three patients required antiemetics and eight patients in the control group needed antiemetics.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Olanzapine 10 mg had a higher effect than the lower concentration of 5 mg or control in reducing the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting in the first postoperative 24 h.</p>","PeriodicalId":35481,"journal":{"name":"Journal of perioperative practice","volume":" ","pages":"17504589241308820"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of perioperative practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17504589241308820","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We conducted this study to compare the efficacy of oral 10 and 5 mg olanzapine for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting.

Methods: Notably, 135 female patients between the ages of 18 and 50 years, classed as American Society of Anaesthesiologists I and II, who underwent elective laparoscopic gynaecological surgery under general anaesthesia were randomly assigned to one of three groups (45 each) to receive perioperative 5 or 10 mg oral olanzapine (OL5 and OL10 groups), or a placebo (in the control group). Postoperation, we recorded the occurrence and severity of postoperative nausea and vomiting within 24 h, the number of patients who received antiemetics and any associated side effects.

Results: Postoperative nausea was more prevalent in the control group (23 patients) than in OL5 and OL10 groups (13 and three patients, respectively); Group OL10 had the lowest severity of nausea. There was no incidence of vomiting in the OL10 group, and only one patient required antiemetics; in the OL5 group, three patients required antiemetics and eight patients in the control group needed antiemetics.

Conclusion: Olanzapine 10 mg had a higher effect than the lower concentration of 5 mg or control in reducing the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting in the first postoperative 24 h.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of perioperative practice
Journal of perioperative practice Nursing-Medical and Surgical Nursing
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
59
期刊介绍: The Journal of Perioperative Practice (JPP) is the official journal of the Association for Perioperative Practice (AfPP). It is an international, peer reviewed journal with a multidisciplinary ethos across all aspects of perioperative care. The overall aim of the journal is to improve patient safety through informing and developing practice. It is an informative professional journal which provides current evidence-based practice, clinical, management and educational developments for practitioners working in the perioperative environment. The journal promotes perioperative practice by publishing clinical research-based articles, literature reviews, topical discussions, advice on clinical issues, current news items and product information.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信