Learning Curve for Robotic Inguinal Hernia Repair With da Vinci Single-Port Robotic System.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q3 SURGERY
Surgical Innovation Pub Date : 2025-06-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-26 DOI:10.1177/15533506251314605
Francesco Celotto, Niccolò Ramacciotti, Giacomo Danieli, Federico Pinto, Gaya Spolverato, Luca Morelli, Francesco Maria Bianco
{"title":"Learning Curve for Robotic Inguinal Hernia Repair With da Vinci Single-Port Robotic System.","authors":"Francesco Celotto, Niccolò Ramacciotti, Giacomo Danieli, Federico Pinto, Gaya Spolverato, Luca Morelli, Francesco Maria Bianco","doi":"10.1177/15533506251314605","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>BackgroundTransabdominal pre-peritoneal inguinal hernia repair using the da Vinci Single-Port robot (SP-TAPP) is currently performed in few centers. We aimed to define the learning curve for SP-TAPP by analyzing operative times.MethodsThe operative times of 122 SP-TAPP performed between 2019 and 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. The following phases were analyzed: docking time (DT); pre-robot time (PRT, from skin incision to side cart placement); flap closure time (FCT); console time (CT), and overall time (OT). Cumulative sum analysis (CUSUM) was used to analyze learning curves. Surgical and 30-day outcome were analyzed.ResultsThe DT has remained constant over time (<i>P</i> > 0.9). PRT was divided into 3 phases with n1 = 5, n2 = 95 and n3 = 4, in which there was a progressive decrease in time (14.8 vs 11.9 vs 6.8 min; <i>P</i> = 0.08). In FCT and CT, 3 phases were identified in which times remained stable (<i>P</i> > 0.9 and <i>P</i> = 0.7). CUSUM analysis of OT identified 3 phases consisting of n1 = 13, n2 = 100 and n3 = 9 in which there was a progressive decrease in times (82 vs 72 vs 62 min; <i>P</i> = 0.3). Analysis of complications and early surgical outcomes did not differ except for estimated blood loss, although this was a clinically insignificant finding.ConclusionsThe learning curve for SP-TAPP is rapid and it shows how the technical skills are transferable between the multiport platform and the da Vinci Single Port robotic system for an experienced surgeon. An improvement is evident in PRT and OT, also compared to multiport systems, showing a potential for the platform to increase surgical activity.</p>","PeriodicalId":22095,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Innovation","volume":" ","pages":"253-261"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/15533506251314605","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/26 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BackgroundTransabdominal pre-peritoneal inguinal hernia repair using the da Vinci Single-Port robot (SP-TAPP) is currently performed in few centers. We aimed to define the learning curve for SP-TAPP by analyzing operative times.MethodsThe operative times of 122 SP-TAPP performed between 2019 and 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. The following phases were analyzed: docking time (DT); pre-robot time (PRT, from skin incision to side cart placement); flap closure time (FCT); console time (CT), and overall time (OT). Cumulative sum analysis (CUSUM) was used to analyze learning curves. Surgical and 30-day outcome were analyzed.ResultsThe DT has remained constant over time (P > 0.9). PRT was divided into 3 phases with n1 = 5, n2 = 95 and n3 = 4, in which there was a progressive decrease in time (14.8 vs 11.9 vs 6.8 min; P = 0.08). In FCT and CT, 3 phases were identified in which times remained stable (P > 0.9 and P = 0.7). CUSUM analysis of OT identified 3 phases consisting of n1 = 13, n2 = 100 and n3 = 9 in which there was a progressive decrease in times (82 vs 72 vs 62 min; P = 0.3). Analysis of complications and early surgical outcomes did not differ except for estimated blood loss, although this was a clinically insignificant finding.ConclusionsThe learning curve for SP-TAPP is rapid and it shows how the technical skills are transferable between the multiport platform and the da Vinci Single Port robotic system for an experienced surgeon. An improvement is evident in PRT and OT, also compared to multiport systems, showing a potential for the platform to increase surgical activity.

用达芬奇单端口机器人系统修复腹股沟疝的学习曲线。
背景:目前在少数中心使用达芬奇单端口机器人(SP-TAPP)进行经腹膜前腹股沟疝修补。我们的目的是通过分析手术时间来定义SP-TAPP的学习曲线。方法:回顾性分析2019 ~ 2024年122例SP-TAPP手术次数。分析了对接时间(DT);预机器人时间(PRT,从皮肤切口到侧推车放置);皮瓣闭合时间(FCT);控制台时间(CT)和总时间(OT)。采用累积和分析(CUSUM)分析学习曲线。分析手术和30天的预后。结果:随着时间的推移,DT保持不变(P < 0.9)。PRT分为n1 = 5、n2 = 95、n3 = 4 3个阶段,时间逐渐缩短(14.8 vs 11.9 vs 6.8 min;P = 0.08)。在FCT和CT中,有3个相的时间保持稳定(P = 0.9和P = 0.7)。CUSUM分析确定了3个阶段,n1 = 13, n2 = 100和n3 = 9,其中时间逐渐减少(82分钟vs 72分钟vs 62分钟;P = 0.3)。除了估计的失血量外,并发症和早期手术结果的分析没有差异,尽管这是一个临床无关紧要的发现。结论:SP-TAPP的学习曲线是快速的,它显示了一个经验丰富的外科医生如何在多端口平台和达芬奇单端口机器人系统之间转移技术技能。与多端口系统相比,PRT和OT的改善也很明显,表明该平台有可能增加手术活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Surgical Innovation
Surgical Innovation 医学-外科
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Surgical Innovation (SRI) is a peer-reviewed bi-monthly journal focusing on minimally invasive surgical techniques, new instruments such as laparoscopes and endoscopes, and new technologies. SRI prepares surgeons to think and work in "the operating room of the future" through learning new techniques, understanding and adapting to new technologies, maintaining surgical competencies, and applying surgical outcomes data to their practices. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信