Outcomes of utilizing double-incision technique with combination of cortical button and interference screw fixation for distal biceps rupture: A case series.
Brandon T Fisher, Alexander Cm Chong, Kevin P Feltz, Howard T Berglund, Jason L Hurd
{"title":"Outcomes of utilizing double-incision technique with combination of cortical button and interference screw fixation for distal biceps rupture: A case series.","authors":"Brandon T Fisher, Alexander Cm Chong, Kevin P Feltz, Howard T Berglund, Jason L Hurd","doi":"10.1177/17585732241312212","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Distal biceps tendon rupture is an injury that causes a significant reduction in strength and endurance. Combined cortical button and interference screw fixation has been utilized via single-incision technique. There are limited data describing this technique utilizing a double-incision approach. This study describes patient outcomes for primary distal biceps repair with combined cortical button and interference screw fixation via double-incision approach.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a case series analysis of patients within a single Midwest institution between January 2006 and February 2020. We examined patient demographics, intraoperative efficiency variables, patient outcomes, and postoperative complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Sixty-two cases were included (62 males; 44 acute complete ruptures, 1 acute partial rupture, 8 chronic complete ruptures, 9 chronic partial ruptures). Average operative time was 48 ± 23 min. Nonformal manner postoperative range of motion (ROM) results show 89%-92% within satisfactory elbow ROM parameters. There were two reported postoperative complications, but no instances of neurapraxia, wound dehiscence, synostosis, proximal radius fracture, or fixation failure.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings of this study demonstrate that the described technique is safe, reliable, and effective. This will help surgeons determine the best method of fixation and approach with the goal of minimizing postoperative complications in patients with distal biceps ruptures.</p>","PeriodicalId":36705,"journal":{"name":"Shoulder and Elbow","volume":" ","pages":"17585732241312212"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11755422/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Shoulder and Elbow","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/17585732241312212","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Distal biceps tendon rupture is an injury that causes a significant reduction in strength and endurance. Combined cortical button and interference screw fixation has been utilized via single-incision technique. There are limited data describing this technique utilizing a double-incision approach. This study describes patient outcomes for primary distal biceps repair with combined cortical button and interference screw fixation via double-incision approach.
Methods: This is a case series analysis of patients within a single Midwest institution between January 2006 and February 2020. We examined patient demographics, intraoperative efficiency variables, patient outcomes, and postoperative complications.
Results: Sixty-two cases were included (62 males; 44 acute complete ruptures, 1 acute partial rupture, 8 chronic complete ruptures, 9 chronic partial ruptures). Average operative time was 48 ± 23 min. Nonformal manner postoperative range of motion (ROM) results show 89%-92% within satisfactory elbow ROM parameters. There were two reported postoperative complications, but no instances of neurapraxia, wound dehiscence, synostosis, proximal radius fracture, or fixation failure.
Conclusion: The findings of this study demonstrate that the described technique is safe, reliable, and effective. This will help surgeons determine the best method of fixation and approach with the goal of minimizing postoperative complications in patients with distal biceps ruptures.