Radiofrequency Ablation of Low-Risk Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma: A Retrospective Cohort Study Including Patients with More than 10 Years of Follow-up.

IF 5.8 1区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Thyroid Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-27 DOI:10.1089/thy.2024.0535
So Yeong Jeong, Sun Mi Baek, Suyoung Shin, Jung Min Son, Hyunsoo Kim, Jung Hwan Baek
{"title":"Radiofrequency Ablation of Low-Risk Papillary Thyroid Microcarcinoma: A Retrospective Cohort Study Including Patients with More than 10 Years of Follow-up.","authors":"So Yeong Jeong, Sun Mi Baek, Suyoung Shin, Jung Min Son, Hyunsoo Kim, Jung Hwan Baek","doi":"10.1089/thy.2024.0535","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b><i>Background:</i></b> The longest reported follow-up for thermal ablation of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC) is 5 years. We evaluated the long-term efficacy and safety of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in patients with low-risk PTMC with clinical follow-up of more than 10 years. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> In this retrospective cohort study, we included patients with low-risk PTMC who had more than 10 years of follow-up after ultrasound (US)-guided RFA (performed between May 2008 and December 2013). Sixty-five consecutive patients with 71 low-risk PTMCs who were unsuitable for surgery or declined surgery were included. Before RFA, all patients underwent US and thyroid computerized tomography. Repeat RFA for staged ablation was performed when the first RFA did not secure sufficient safety margins because of the tumor closely abutting the recurrent laryngeal nerve. Follow-up US imaging was performed at 1 week, 3 months, 6 months, every 6 months until 2 years, and then annually afterward. Primary outcomes were the respective cumulative rates of disease progression (defined by local tumor progression, lymph node, or distant metastasis), newly developed thyroid cancer, and conversion surgery. Secondary outcomes were serial volume reduction rate (VRR), complete disappearance rate of ablated PTMC, and adverse events associated with procedures. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Of 65 patients included in the study, 60 had unifocal and 5 had multifocal PTMCs. The mean number of RFA sessions per tumor was 1.2, and the median follow-up duration was 151 months (interquartile ranges, 131-157). Twenty percent (13/65) of patients required repeat RFA. There were no cases of disease progression. Five patients (5/65, 7.7%) developed a new papillary thyroid cancer (four treated with RFA and one with lobectomy). At 24 months, the mean VRR was 100%, and this was maintained throughout the final follow-up. The complete tumor disappearance rates after one or more RFA treatments were 40.8% (29/71), 74.6% (53/71), and 100% (71/71) at 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively. One major (subclinical hypothyroidism) and three minor adverse events occurred. <b><i>Conclusions:</i></b> In our experience, RFA of low-risk PTMC is effective and safe. During more than 10 years of follow-up, we observed no incident local tumor progression nor metastases, but 7.7% of patients developed a new papillary thyroid cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":23016,"journal":{"name":"Thyroid","volume":" ","pages":"143-152"},"PeriodicalIF":5.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Thyroid","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/thy.2024.0535","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The longest reported follow-up for thermal ablation of papillary thyroid microcarcinoma (PTMC) is 5 years. We evaluated the long-term efficacy and safety of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) in patients with low-risk PTMC with clinical follow-up of more than 10 years. Methods: In this retrospective cohort study, we included patients with low-risk PTMC who had more than 10 years of follow-up after ultrasound (US)-guided RFA (performed between May 2008 and December 2013). Sixty-five consecutive patients with 71 low-risk PTMCs who were unsuitable for surgery or declined surgery were included. Before RFA, all patients underwent US and thyroid computerized tomography. Repeat RFA for staged ablation was performed when the first RFA did not secure sufficient safety margins because of the tumor closely abutting the recurrent laryngeal nerve. Follow-up US imaging was performed at 1 week, 3 months, 6 months, every 6 months until 2 years, and then annually afterward. Primary outcomes were the respective cumulative rates of disease progression (defined by local tumor progression, lymph node, or distant metastasis), newly developed thyroid cancer, and conversion surgery. Secondary outcomes were serial volume reduction rate (VRR), complete disappearance rate of ablated PTMC, and adverse events associated with procedures. Results: Of 65 patients included in the study, 60 had unifocal and 5 had multifocal PTMCs. The mean number of RFA sessions per tumor was 1.2, and the median follow-up duration was 151 months (interquartile ranges, 131-157). Twenty percent (13/65) of patients required repeat RFA. There were no cases of disease progression. Five patients (5/65, 7.7%) developed a new papillary thyroid cancer (four treated with RFA and one with lobectomy). At 24 months, the mean VRR was 100%, and this was maintained throughout the final follow-up. The complete tumor disappearance rates after one or more RFA treatments were 40.8% (29/71), 74.6% (53/71), and 100% (71/71) at 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively. One major (subclinical hypothyroidism) and three minor adverse events occurred. Conclusions: In our experience, RFA of low-risk PTMC is effective and safe. During more than 10 years of follow-up, we observed no incident local tumor progression nor metastases, but 7.7% of patients developed a new papillary thyroid cancer.

射频消融术治疗低风险甲状腺乳头状微癌:一项随访超过10年的回顾性队列研究。
背景:热消融治疗甲状腺乳头状微癌(PTMC)的最长随访时间为5年。我们评估了射频消融(RFA)治疗低风险PTMC患者的长期疗效和安全性,临床随访超过10年。方法:在这项回顾性队列研究中,我们纳入了2008年5月至2013年12月超声(US)引导下RFA术后随访10年以上的低风险PTMC患者。纳入了65例连续71例低风险ptmc患者,他们不适合手术或拒绝手术。RFA前,所有患者均行超声造影和甲状腺计算机断层扫描。当第一次射频消融由于肿瘤紧靠喉返神经而不能获得足够的安全边界时,进行重复射频消融分阶段消融。随访1周,3个月,6个月,每6个月进行一次超声成像,直到2年,之后每年进行一次。主要结局是各自的累积疾病进展率(由局部肿瘤进展、淋巴结或远处转移定义)、新发甲状腺癌和转换手术。次要结果为连续容积缩小率(VRR)、消融后PTMC完全消失率以及与手术相关的不良事件。结果:纳入研究的65例患者中,60例为单灶性ptmc, 5例为多灶性ptmc。每个肿瘤的平均RFA治疗次数为1.2次,中位随访时间为151个月(四分位数范围为131-157)。20%(13/65)的患者需要重复RFA。没有疾病进展的病例。5例(5/65,7.7%)新发甲状腺乳头状癌(4例行RFA治疗,1例行肺叶切除术)。在24个月时,平均VRR为100%,并在最后随访期间保持不变。1次及以上RFA治疗后6、12、24个月肿瘤完全消失率分别为40.8%(29/71)、74.6%(53/71)、100%(71/71)。发生了1例主要(亚临床甲状腺功能减退)和3例次要不良事件。结论:根据我们的经验,RFA治疗低风险PTMC是有效和安全的。在超过10年的随访中,我们没有观察到局部肿瘤进展或转移,但7.7%的患者发展为新的甲状腺乳头状癌。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Thyroid
Thyroid 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
6.10%
发文量
195
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: This authoritative journal program, including the monthly flagship journal Thyroid, Clinical Thyroidology® (monthly), and VideoEndocrinology™ (quarterly), delivers in-depth coverage on topics from clinical application and primary care, to the latest advances in diagnostic imaging and surgical techniques and technologies, designed to optimize patient care and outcomes. Thyroid is the leading, peer-reviewed resource for original articles, patient-focused reports, and translational research on thyroid cancer and all thyroid related diseases. The Journal delivers the latest findings on topics from primary care to clinical application, and is the exclusive source for the authoritative and updated American Thyroid Association (ATA) Guidelines for Managing Thyroid Disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信