Relationship Between Quadriceps Strength at 6 Months Postoperatively and Improvement in Patient-Reported Knee Function After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Pub Date : 2025-01-24 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1177/23259671241305623
Tomoya Ishida, Makoto Suzuki, Hisashi Matsumoto, Mina Samukawa, Satoru Kaneko, Chiharu Inoue, Yoshimitsu Aoki, Harukazu Tohyama
{"title":"Relationship Between Quadriceps Strength at 6 Months Postoperatively and Improvement in Patient-Reported Knee Function After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction.","authors":"Tomoya Ishida, Makoto Suzuki, Hisashi Matsumoto, Mina Samukawa, Satoru Kaneko, Chiharu Inoue, Yoshimitsu Aoki, Harukazu Tohyama","doi":"10.1177/23259671241305623","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Understanding the factors associated with poor recovery over time after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) helps clinicians identify patients who are at risk and targets for an intervention.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine the factors associated with improvement in subjective knee function from 6 to 12 months after ACLR.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A total of 91 patients undergoing primary unilateral ACLR were included. Subjective knee function was assessed using the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form (IKDC-SKF) at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Isokinetic knee strength (quadriceps and hamstring) and Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Return to Sport After Injury (ACL-RSI) scale scores were also assessed. Patients were included in the poor recovery group if their improvement in the IKDC-SKF score from 6 to 12 months was <15.5 points (minimal detectable change) and their IKDC-SKF score at 12 months was <90 points (maximum, 100 points). The IKDC-SKF score, knee strength, and the ACL-RSI score were compared between the poor recovery and good recovery groups with and without propensity score matching. Matched variables included age, sex, and IKDC-SKF score at 6 months after ACLR. In addition, logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors that discriminated between the poor recovery and good recovery groups.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>There were 32 participants (35%) allocated to the poor recovery group. Before propensity score matching, the poor recovery group had a significantly older age, lower IKDC-SKF scores at 6 and 12 months, and a lower limb symmetry index (LSI) for quadriceps strength at 6 months. After propensity score matching, the LSI for quadriceps strength at 6 months was significantly different between the poor recovery and good recovery groups (73.0 ± 17.4 vs 83.3 ± 18.2, respectively; <i>P</i> = .039). Logistic regression analysis showed that a lower LSI for quadriceps strength at 6 months was significantly associated with poor recovery of the IKDC-SKF score (odds ratio, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.93-0.98]), and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis identified 80.9% as a cutoff value of the LSI for quadriceps strength with 75.0% sensitivity and 61.0% specificity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>A lower LSI for quadriceps strength at 6 months postoperatively was associated with poor recovery of the IKDC-SKF score from 6 to 12 months after ACLR, even after adjusting for confounders.</p>","PeriodicalId":19646,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":"13 1","pages":"23259671241305623"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11760129/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/23259671241305623","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Understanding the factors associated with poor recovery over time after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) helps clinicians identify patients who are at risk and targets for an intervention.

Purpose: To determine the factors associated with improvement in subjective knee function from 6 to 12 months after ACLR.

Study design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3.

Methods: A total of 91 patients undergoing primary unilateral ACLR were included. Subjective knee function was assessed using the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form (IKDC-SKF) at 6 and 12 months postoperatively. Isokinetic knee strength (quadriceps and hamstring) and Anterior Cruciate Ligament-Return to Sport After Injury (ACL-RSI) scale scores were also assessed. Patients were included in the poor recovery group if their improvement in the IKDC-SKF score from 6 to 12 months was <15.5 points (minimal detectable change) and their IKDC-SKF score at 12 months was <90 points (maximum, 100 points). The IKDC-SKF score, knee strength, and the ACL-RSI score were compared between the poor recovery and good recovery groups with and without propensity score matching. Matched variables included age, sex, and IKDC-SKF score at 6 months after ACLR. In addition, logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors that discriminated between the poor recovery and good recovery groups.

Results: There were 32 participants (35%) allocated to the poor recovery group. Before propensity score matching, the poor recovery group had a significantly older age, lower IKDC-SKF scores at 6 and 12 months, and a lower limb symmetry index (LSI) for quadriceps strength at 6 months. After propensity score matching, the LSI for quadriceps strength at 6 months was significantly different between the poor recovery and good recovery groups (73.0 ± 17.4 vs 83.3 ± 18.2, respectively; P = .039). Logistic regression analysis showed that a lower LSI for quadriceps strength at 6 months was significantly associated with poor recovery of the IKDC-SKF score (odds ratio, 0.96 [95% CI, 0.93-0.98]), and receiver operating characteristic curve analysis identified 80.9% as a cutoff value of the LSI for quadriceps strength with 75.0% sensitivity and 61.0% specificity.

Conclusion: A lower LSI for quadriceps strength at 6 months postoperatively was associated with poor recovery of the IKDC-SKF score from 6 to 12 months after ACLR, even after adjusting for confounders.

背景:目的:确定前交叉韧带重建术(ACLR)后 6 至 12 个月膝关节主观功能改善的相关因素:研究设计:病例对照研究;证据等级,3:方法:共纳入91名接受原发性单侧前交叉韧带置换术的患者。在术后6个月和12个月时使用国际膝关节文献委员会主观膝关节表格(IKDC-SKF)评估主观膝关节功能。此外,还评估了等速膝关节力量(股四头肌和腿肌)和前交叉韧带-伤后恢复运动(ACL-RSI)量表评分。如果患者在 6 至 12 个月期间的 IKDC-SKF 评分改善结果为 "恢复不良",则将其纳入 "恢复不良 "组:有 32 名参与者(35%)被分配到恢复不良组。在倾向得分匹配前,恢复不良组患者的年龄明显偏大,6个月和12个月时的IKDC-SKF得分较低,6个月时的股四头肌力量的肢体对称性指数(LSI)较低。经过倾向得分匹配后,恢复不良组和恢复良好组在 6 个月时的股四头肌力量 LSI 有显著差异(分别为 73.0 ± 17.4 vs 83.3 ± 18.2;P = .039)。逻辑回归分析表明,6个月时股四头肌力量的LSI值越低,IKDC-SKF评分的恢复情况越差(几率为0.96 [95% CI, 0.93-0.98]),接收器操作特征曲线分析确定80.9%为股四头肌力量LSI的临界值,敏感性为75.0%,特异性为61.0%:结论:即使调整了混杂因素,术后6个月股四头肌力量LSI值越低,IKDC-SKF评分在前交叉韧带置换术后6至12个月的恢复情况越差。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine
Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
7.70%
发文量
876
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine (OJSM), developed by the American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine (AOSSM), is a global, peer-reviewed, open access journal that combines the interests of researchers and clinical practitioners across orthopaedic sports medicine, arthroscopy, and knee arthroplasty. Topics include original research in the areas of: -Orthopaedic Sports Medicine, including surgical and nonsurgical treatment of orthopaedic sports injuries -Arthroscopic Surgery (Shoulder/Elbow/Wrist/Hip/Knee/Ankle/Foot) -Relevant translational research -Sports traumatology/epidemiology -Knee and shoulder arthroplasty The OJSM also publishes relevant systematic reviews and meta-analyses. This journal is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信