Considerations for Perioperative Management Guidance Regarding GLP-1 Receptor Agonists: Evaluation of Current Practices and Future Directions.

IF 1.2 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Kayla M Knuf, Krista B Highland, Kathryn C Houhoulis, Angela D McElrath
{"title":"Considerations for Perioperative Management Guidance Regarding GLP-1 Receptor Agonists: Evaluation of Current Practices and Future Directions.","authors":"Kayla M Knuf, Krista B Highland, Kathryn C Houhoulis, Angela D McElrath","doi":"10.1093/milmed/usaf029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) have become increasingly prevalent and have the potential to delay gastric emptying. The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) released guidance regarding the perioperative management of patients receiving GLP-1 RAs, but it is unclear the extent to which hospitals in the U.S. Military Health System have implemented policies consistent with this guidance.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A questionnaire was sent to active duty anesthesiologists and Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetists (CRNAs) working in the U.S. Military Health System. The questions assessed the presence of institutional GLP-1 RA perioperative policies, adherence to the policy (if applicable), the basis and components of current and recommended future institutional policies, institutional tracking of policy implementation and outcomes, and knowledge, skills, barriers, and continuing medical education goals related to the perioperative management of patients receiving GLP-1 RAs.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The response rate was 32% (N = 265); a little over half of the respondents were anesthesiologists (53%); and respondents' primary practices included over 50 institutions. More than half (54%) indicated that their primary practice location had a GLP-1 RA perioperative policy; 65% of whom indicated that they always followed the policy. In review of practice locations with >1 respondents, there was a lack of perfect agreement across most locations. The most commonly reported basis for the policy was ASA guidance (87%), followed by department leadership (37%). Barriers to any system-wide GLP-1 perioperative management policy included a lack of gastric ultrasound practice and comfort, as well as reported skills and knowledge, pressure not to cancel cases, scheduling problems, and productivity requirements.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Formal policies were reported by most respondents, but inconsistencies within practice locations suggest that local policy implementation could be improved. Commonly reported barriers to future system-wide policy implementation provide data-driven information for system-wide efforts to improve policy success.</p>","PeriodicalId":18638,"journal":{"name":"Military Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Military Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/milmed/usaf029","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) have become increasingly prevalent and have the potential to delay gastric emptying. The American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) released guidance regarding the perioperative management of patients receiving GLP-1 RAs, but it is unclear the extent to which hospitals in the U.S. Military Health System have implemented policies consistent with this guidance.

Methods: A questionnaire was sent to active duty anesthesiologists and Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetists (CRNAs) working in the U.S. Military Health System. The questions assessed the presence of institutional GLP-1 RA perioperative policies, adherence to the policy (if applicable), the basis and components of current and recommended future institutional policies, institutional tracking of policy implementation and outcomes, and knowledge, skills, barriers, and continuing medical education goals related to the perioperative management of patients receiving GLP-1 RAs.

Results: The response rate was 32% (N = 265); a little over half of the respondents were anesthesiologists (53%); and respondents' primary practices included over 50 institutions. More than half (54%) indicated that their primary practice location had a GLP-1 RA perioperative policy; 65% of whom indicated that they always followed the policy. In review of practice locations with >1 respondents, there was a lack of perfect agreement across most locations. The most commonly reported basis for the policy was ASA guidance (87%), followed by department leadership (37%). Barriers to any system-wide GLP-1 perioperative management policy included a lack of gastric ultrasound practice and comfort, as well as reported skills and knowledge, pressure not to cancel cases, scheduling problems, and productivity requirements.

Conclusions: Formal policies were reported by most respondents, but inconsistencies within practice locations suggest that local policy implementation could be improved. Commonly reported barriers to future system-wide policy implementation provide data-driven information for system-wide efforts to improve policy success.

关于 GLP-1 受体激动剂围手术期管理指南的考虑因素:评估当前做法和未来方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Military Medicine
Military Medicine MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
393
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Military Medicine is the official international journal of AMSUS. Articles published in the journal are peer-reviewed scientific papers, case reports, and editorials. The journal also publishes letters to the editor. The objective of the journal is to promote awareness of federal medicine by providing a forum for responsible discussion of common ideas and problems relevant to federal healthcare. Its mission is: To increase healthcare education by providing scientific and other information to its readers; to facilitate communication; and to offer a prestige publication for members’ writings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信