Predicting Individual Pain Sensitivity Using a Novel Cortical Biomarker Signature.

IF 20.4 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Nahian S Chowdhury, Chuan Bi, Andrew J Furman, Alan K I Chiang, Patrick Skippen, Emily Si, Samantha K Millard, Sarah M Margerison, Darrah Spies, Michael L Keaser, Joyce T Da Silva, Shuo Chen, Siobhan M Schabrun, David A Seminowicz
{"title":"Predicting Individual Pain Sensitivity Using a Novel Cortical Biomarker Signature.","authors":"Nahian S Chowdhury, Chuan Bi, Andrew J Furman, Alan K I Chiang, Patrick Skippen, Emily Si, Samantha K Millard, Sarah M Margerison, Darrah Spies, Michael L Keaser, Joyce T Da Silva, Shuo Chen, Siobhan M Schabrun, David A Seminowicz","doi":"10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.4857","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Biomarkers would greatly assist decision-making in the diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of chronic pain.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To undertake analytical validation of a sensorimotor cortical biomarker signature for pain consisting of 2 measures: sensorimotor peak alpha frequency (PAF) and corticomotor excitability (CME).</p><p><strong>Design, setting, and participants: </strong>This cohort study at a single center (Neuroscience Research Australia) recruited participants from November 2020 to October 2022 through notices placed online and at universities across Australia. Participants were healthy adults aged 18 to 44 years with no history of chronic pain or a neurological or psychiatric condition. Participants experienced a model of prolonged temporomandibular pain with outcomes collected over 30 days. Electroencephalography to assess PAF and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to assess CME were recorded on days 0, 2, and 5. Pain was assessed twice daily from days 1 through 30.</p><p><strong>Exposure: </strong>Participants received an injection of nerve growth factor (NGF) to the right masseter muscle on days 0 and 2 to induce prolonged temporomandibular pain lasting up to 4 weeks.</p><p><strong>Main outcomes and measures: </strong>The predictive accuracy of the PAF/CME biomarker signature was determined using a nested control-test scheme: machine learning models were run on a training set (n = 100), where PAF and CME were predictors and pain sensitivity was the outcome. The winning classifier was assessed on a test set (n = 50) comparing the predicted pain labels against the true labels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the final sample of 150 participants, 66 were female and 84 were male; the mean (SD) age was 25.1 (6.2) years. The winning classifier was logistic regression, with an outstanding area under the curve (AUC = 1.00). The locked model assessed on the test set had excellent performance (AUC = 0.88; 95% CI, 0.78-0.99). Results were reproduced across a range of methodological parameters. Moreover, inclusion of sex and pain catastrophizing as covariates did not improve model performance, suggesting the model including biomarkers only was more robust. PAF and CME biomarkers showed good to excellent test-retest reliability.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>This study provides evidence for a sensorimotor cortical biomarker signature for pain sensitivity. The combination of accuracy, reproducibility, and reliability suggests the PAF/CME biomarker signature has substantial potential for clinical translation, including predicting the transition from acute to chronic pain.</p>","PeriodicalId":14677,"journal":{"name":"JAMA neurology","volume":" ","pages":"237-246"},"PeriodicalIF":20.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11773403/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA neurology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2024.4857","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Biomarkers would greatly assist decision-making in the diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of chronic pain.

Objective: To undertake analytical validation of a sensorimotor cortical biomarker signature for pain consisting of 2 measures: sensorimotor peak alpha frequency (PAF) and corticomotor excitability (CME).

Design, setting, and participants: This cohort study at a single center (Neuroscience Research Australia) recruited participants from November 2020 to October 2022 through notices placed online and at universities across Australia. Participants were healthy adults aged 18 to 44 years with no history of chronic pain or a neurological or psychiatric condition. Participants experienced a model of prolonged temporomandibular pain with outcomes collected over 30 days. Electroencephalography to assess PAF and transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to assess CME were recorded on days 0, 2, and 5. Pain was assessed twice daily from days 1 through 30.

Exposure: Participants received an injection of nerve growth factor (NGF) to the right masseter muscle on days 0 and 2 to induce prolonged temporomandibular pain lasting up to 4 weeks.

Main outcomes and measures: The predictive accuracy of the PAF/CME biomarker signature was determined using a nested control-test scheme: machine learning models were run on a training set (n = 100), where PAF and CME were predictors and pain sensitivity was the outcome. The winning classifier was assessed on a test set (n = 50) comparing the predicted pain labels against the true labels.

Results: Among the final sample of 150 participants, 66 were female and 84 were male; the mean (SD) age was 25.1 (6.2) years. The winning classifier was logistic regression, with an outstanding area under the curve (AUC = 1.00). The locked model assessed on the test set had excellent performance (AUC = 0.88; 95% CI, 0.78-0.99). Results were reproduced across a range of methodological parameters. Moreover, inclusion of sex and pain catastrophizing as covariates did not improve model performance, suggesting the model including biomarkers only was more robust. PAF and CME biomarkers showed good to excellent test-retest reliability.

Conclusions and relevance: This study provides evidence for a sensorimotor cortical biomarker signature for pain sensitivity. The combination of accuracy, reproducibility, and reliability suggests the PAF/CME biomarker signature has substantial potential for clinical translation, including predicting the transition from acute to chronic pain.

使用一种新的皮质生物标志物特征预测个体疼痛敏感性。
重要性:生物标志物将极大地帮助慢性疼痛的诊断、预防和治疗决策。目的:对由感觉-运动α峰频率(PAF)和皮质运动兴奋性(CME)两种测量指标组成的疼痛感觉-运动皮质生物标志物特征进行分析验证。设计、环境和参与者:这项在单一中心(澳大利亚神经科学研究所)进行的队列研究,从2020年11月到2022年10月,通过在线和澳大利亚各地大学的通知招募参与者。参与者是18至44岁的健康成年人,没有慢性疼痛史,也没有神经或精神疾病。参与者经历了一个延长的颞下颌关节疼痛模型,其结果收集超过30天。在第0、2和5天分别记录脑电图评估PAF和经颅磁刺激(TMS)评估CME。从第1天到第30天,每天评估两次疼痛。暴露:参与者在第0天和第2天向右咬肌注射神经生长因子(NGF),以诱导持续长达4周的颞下颌疼痛。主要结果和测量:使用嵌套控制测试方案确定PAF/CME生物标志物特征的预测准确性:在训练集(n = 100)上运行机器学习模型,其中PAF和CME是预测因子,疼痛敏感性是结果。获胜的分类器在测试集(n = 50)上进行评估,将预测的疼痛标签与真实标签进行比较。结果:在150名参与者的最终样本中,女性66人,男性84人;平均(SD)年龄为25.1(6.2)岁。获胜的分类器是逻辑回归,曲线下面积突出(AUC = 1.00)。在测试集上评估的锁定模型具有优异的性能(AUC = 0.88;95% ci, 0.78-0.99)。结果在一系列方法学参数中得到了再现。此外,将性别和疼痛灾难化作为协变量并没有提高模型的性能,这表明只包含生物标志物的模型更稳健。PAF和CME生物标志物具有良好至优异的重测信度。结论和相关性:本研究为疼痛敏感性的感觉运动皮质生物标志物特征提供了证据。准确性、可重复性和可靠性的结合表明,PAF/CME生物标志物特征具有巨大的临床转化潜力,包括预测从急性到慢性疼痛的转变。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JAMA neurology
JAMA neurology CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
CiteScore
41.90
自引率
1.70%
发文量
250
期刊介绍: JAMA Neurology is an international peer-reviewed journal for physicians caring for people with neurologic disorders and those interested in the structure and function of the normal and diseased nervous system. The Archives of Neurology & Psychiatry began publication in 1919 and, in 1959, became 2 separate journals: Archives of Neurology and Archives of General Psychiatry. In 2013, their names changed to JAMA Neurology and JAMA Psychiatry, respectively. JAMA Neurology is a member of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed, general medical and specialty publications.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信