The ketamine chameleon: history, pharmacology, and the contested value of experience.

IF 3.6 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Danny Diep, Sara de la Salle, Julien Thibault Lévesque, Michael Lifshitz, Nicolas Garel, Kyle T Greenway
{"title":"The ketamine chameleon: history, pharmacology, and the contested value of experience.","authors":"Danny Diep, Sara de la Salle, Julien Thibault Lévesque, Michael Lifshitz, Nicolas Garel, Kyle T Greenway","doi":"10.1080/17512433.2025.2459377","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Since its synthesis in 1962, ketamine has been widely used in diverse medical contexts, from anesthesia to treatment-resistant depression. However, interpretations of ketamine's subjective effects remain polarized. Biomedical frameworks typically construe the drug's experiential effects as dissociative or psychotomimetic, while psychedelic paradigms emphasize the potential therapeutic merits of these non-ordinary states.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>Ketamine's psychoactive effects have inspired diverse interpretations. In this review, we trace the historical evolution of these perspectives - which we broadly categorize as 'dissociative,' 'dream-like,' and 'psychedelic' - and show how they emerged out of these clinical contexts. We highlight the influence of factors such as language, dose, and environmental context on ketamine's effects and therapeutic outcomes. We discuss potential mechanisms underlying these context-dependent effects and explore the broader clinical and research-related ramifications.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>Ketamine's subjective effects are undeniably powerful, yet their therapeutic significance remains debated. A nuanced, interdisciplinary approach is essential for maximizing ketamine's potential. Future research should focus on how explanatory models, treatment environments, and patient preparation can optimize ketamine's benefits while minimizing distress. We suggest that, rather than being a tiger to be tamed as its creator once described, ketamine may best be understood as a chameleon whose color shifts depending on its context.</p>","PeriodicalId":12207,"journal":{"name":"Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology","volume":" ","pages":"109-129"},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17512433.2025.2459377","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/2/2 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Since its synthesis in 1962, ketamine has been widely used in diverse medical contexts, from anesthesia to treatment-resistant depression. However, interpretations of ketamine's subjective effects remain polarized. Biomedical frameworks typically construe the drug's experiential effects as dissociative or psychotomimetic, while psychedelic paradigms emphasize the potential therapeutic merits of these non-ordinary states.

Areas covered: Ketamine's psychoactive effects have inspired diverse interpretations. In this review, we trace the historical evolution of these perspectives - which we broadly categorize as 'dissociative,' 'dream-like,' and 'psychedelic' - and show how they emerged out of these clinical contexts. We highlight the influence of factors such as language, dose, and environmental context on ketamine's effects and therapeutic outcomes. We discuss potential mechanisms underlying these context-dependent effects and explore the broader clinical and research-related ramifications.

Expert opinion: Ketamine's subjective effects are undeniably powerful, yet their therapeutic significance remains debated. A nuanced, interdisciplinary approach is essential for maximizing ketamine's potential. Future research should focus on how explanatory models, treatment environments, and patient preparation can optimize ketamine's benefits while minimizing distress. We suggest that, rather than being a tiger to be tamed as its creator once described, ketamine may best be understood as a chameleon whose color shifts depending on its context.

氯胺酮变色龙:历史、药理学和有争议的经验价值。
自1962年合成以来,氯胺酮已广泛应用于从麻醉到难治性抑郁症等各种医学领域。然而,对氯胺酮主观效应的解释仍然两极分化。生物医学框架通常将药物的体验效应解释为解离或拟精神,而迷幻范式则强调这些非普通状态的潜在治疗价值。涉及领域:氯胺酮的精神作用激发了不同的解释。在这篇综述中,我们追溯了这些观点的历史演变——我们大致将其归类为“分离的”、“梦幻的”和“迷幻的”——并展示了它们是如何从这些临床背景中出现的。我们强调了语言、剂量和环境背景等因素对氯胺酮效果和治疗结果的影响。我们讨论了这些情境依赖效应的潜在机制,并探讨了更广泛的临床和研究相关的后果。专家意见:氯胺酮的主观效应无可否认是强大的,但其治疗意义仍有争议。一种微妙的、跨学科的方法对于最大限度地发挥氯胺酮的潜力至关重要。未来的研究应该集中在解释模型、治疗环境和患者准备如何优化氯胺酮的益处,同时最大限度地减少痛苦。我们认为,与其像它的创造者曾经描述的那样,氯胺酮是一只需要驯服的老虎,不如把它理解为一只变色的变色龙,它的颜色会随着环境的变化而变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology
Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
2.30%
发文量
127
期刊介绍: Advances in drug development technologies are yielding innovative new therapies, from potentially lifesaving medicines to lifestyle products. In recent years, however, the cost of developing new drugs has soared, and concerns over drug resistance and pharmacoeconomics have come to the fore. Adverse reactions experienced at the clinical trial level serve as a constant reminder of the importance of rigorous safety and toxicity testing. Furthermore the advent of pharmacogenomics and ‘individualized’ approaches to therapy will demand a fresh approach to drug evaluation and healthcare delivery. Clinical Pharmacology provides an essential role in integrating the expertise of all of the specialists and players who are active in meeting such challenges in modern biomedical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信