Contemporary clinical perspectives on chronic low back pain: The biology, mechanics, etc. underpinning clinical and radiological evaluation

IF 3.4 3区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS
JOR Spine Pub Date : 2025-01-23 DOI:10.1002/jsp2.70021
Stone Sima, Ashish Diwan
{"title":"Contemporary clinical perspectives on chronic low back pain: The biology, mechanics, etc. underpinning clinical and radiological evaluation","authors":"Stone Sima,&nbsp;Ashish Diwan","doi":"10.1002/jsp2.70021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Pain of a chronic nature remains the foremost concern in tertiary spine clinics, yet its elusive nature and quantification challenges persist. Despite extensive research and education on low back pain (LBP), the realm of diagnostic practices lacks a unified approach. Clinically, LBP exhibits a multifaceted character, encompassing conventional assessments of severity and disability, alongside nuanced attributes like pain characterization, duration, and patient expectations. Common instigators of LBP encountered in spine surgical settings comprise degenerated intervertebral discs (IVD), herniated IVD, canal and foraminal stenosis, and spondylolisthesis. However, addressing the root cause necessitates its identification and substantiation through visualization.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This perspective reviews the diagnostic complexities of LBP. Thorough history-taking and physical examinations offer preliminary insights into the underlying source of pain, whether it arises from discogenic origins, neural compression, or sagittal imbalance. The importance of classifying chronic LBP into the underlying pathophysiology is explored. Emphasis is placed on the necessity of aligning clinical observations with imaging findings to guide personalized treatment strategies.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Currently, there exists a disparity globally between evidence-based recommendations and actual applications. Recent discoveries behind the pathophysiology of pain phenotypes signify the importance of classifying LBP into its neuropathic or nociceptive origins. The pivotal role of radiological investigations in validating clinical findings for an accurate diagnosis cannot be overstated. However, radiology should not operate in isolation; the disconnect between the clinical and radiological realms ultimately benefits neither the patient nor the surgeon. Additionally, more sensitive measures of IVD prolapse and the corresponding inflammatory pathway triggered are required to provide information on the underlying pathophysiological mechanism of pain generation.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This perspective article underscores the imperative fusion of clinical acumen and radiological precision in the intricate landscape of LBP diagnosis. These findings advocate for a paradigm shift towards personalized medicine. By offering a compass for surgeons to navigate this complex terrain and deliver more effective, patient-centered care with targeted interventions this article aims to enhance management outcomes for chronic LBP.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":14876,"journal":{"name":"JOR Spine","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11757297/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOR Spine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jsp2.70021","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Pain of a chronic nature remains the foremost concern in tertiary spine clinics, yet its elusive nature and quantification challenges persist. Despite extensive research and education on low back pain (LBP), the realm of diagnostic practices lacks a unified approach. Clinically, LBP exhibits a multifaceted character, encompassing conventional assessments of severity and disability, alongside nuanced attributes like pain characterization, duration, and patient expectations. Common instigators of LBP encountered in spine surgical settings comprise degenerated intervertebral discs (IVD), herniated IVD, canal and foraminal stenosis, and spondylolisthesis. However, addressing the root cause necessitates its identification and substantiation through visualization.

Methods

This perspective reviews the diagnostic complexities of LBP. Thorough history-taking and physical examinations offer preliminary insights into the underlying source of pain, whether it arises from discogenic origins, neural compression, or sagittal imbalance. The importance of classifying chronic LBP into the underlying pathophysiology is explored. Emphasis is placed on the necessity of aligning clinical observations with imaging findings to guide personalized treatment strategies.

Results

Currently, there exists a disparity globally between evidence-based recommendations and actual applications. Recent discoveries behind the pathophysiology of pain phenotypes signify the importance of classifying LBP into its neuropathic or nociceptive origins. The pivotal role of radiological investigations in validating clinical findings for an accurate diagnosis cannot be overstated. However, radiology should not operate in isolation; the disconnect between the clinical and radiological realms ultimately benefits neither the patient nor the surgeon. Additionally, more sensitive measures of IVD prolapse and the corresponding inflammatory pathway triggered are required to provide information on the underlying pathophysiological mechanism of pain generation.

Conclusion

This perspective article underscores the imperative fusion of clinical acumen and radiological precision in the intricate landscape of LBP diagnosis. These findings advocate for a paradigm shift towards personalized medicine. By offering a compass for surgeons to navigate this complex terrain and deliver more effective, patient-centered care with targeted interventions this article aims to enhance management outcomes for chronic LBP.

Abstract Image

慢性腰痛的当代临床观点:生物学、力学等基础的临床和放射学评估。
背景:慢性疼痛仍然是三级脊柱诊所最关心的问题,但其难以捉摸的性质和量化的挑战仍然存在。尽管对腰痛(LBP)进行了广泛的研究和教育,但诊断实践领域缺乏统一的方法。临床上,腰痛表现出多方面的特征,包括常规的严重程度和残疾评估,以及疼痛特征、持续时间和患者期望等细微属性。脊柱外科手术中常见的腰痛诱因包括椎间盘退变、椎间盘突出、椎管和椎间孔狭窄以及脊柱滑脱。然而,解决根本原因需要通过可视化来识别和证实。方法:本文综述了腰痛的诊断复杂性。彻底的病史记录和体格检查可以初步了解疼痛的潜在来源,无论是由椎间盘源性起源、神经压迫还是矢状面不平衡引起的。探讨了将慢性腰痛分类为潜在病理生理的重要性。重点放在临床观察与影像学结果一致的必要性,以指导个性化的治疗策略。结果:目前,在全球范围内,循证建议与实际应用存在差距。最近的发现背后的病理生理学的疼痛表型表明分类腰痛为其神经性或伤害性起源的重要性。放射学检查在验证临床发现以获得准确诊断方面的关键作用不能被夸大。然而,放射学不应该孤立地工作;临床和放射领域之间的脱节最终对病人和外科医生都没有好处。此外,需要对IVD脱垂和相应的炎症通路进行更敏感的测量,以提供疼痛产生的潜在病理生理机制的信息。结论:本文强调了在复杂的腰痛诊断中,临床敏锐度和放射精度的融合是必不可少的。这些发现提倡向个性化医疗模式转变。通过为外科医生提供一个指南针来导航这一复杂的领域,并提供更有效的、以患者为中心的护理和有针对性的干预措施,本文旨在提高慢性腰痛的治疗效果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
JOR Spine
JOR Spine ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
18.90%
发文量
42
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信