Real-world treatment patterns and health outcomes for patients with myelofibrosis treated with fedratinib.

IF 3 4区医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY

Future oncology Pub Date : 2025-01-26 DOI:10.1080/14796694.2025.2454895

Francesco Passamonti, Siddhi Korgaonkar, Rohan C Parikh, Manoj Chevli, Aylin Yucel, Julien Rombi, Shalon Jones, Dorothy Zissler, Keith L Davis, Samantha Slaff

{"title":"Real-world treatment patterns and health outcomes for patients with myelofibrosis treated with fedratinib.","authors":"Francesco Passamonti, Siddhi Korgaonkar, Rohan C Parikh, Manoj Chevli, Aylin Yucel, Julien Rombi, Shalon Jones, Dorothy Zissler, Keith L Davis, Samantha Slaff","doi":"10.1080/14796694.2025.2454895","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: Assess real-world fedratinib (FEDR) treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in patients with primary or secondary myelofibrosis following discontinuation of ruxolitinib (RUX).Patients & methods: This study was a retrospective, noninterventional medical record review of patients in Canada, Germany, and the United Kingdom (UK). A total of 70 physicians (primarily hematologist-oncologists [78.6%]) provided data for 196 eligible patients.Results: Patients were mostly male (62.8%) with primary myelofibrosis (76.5%) and initiated FEDR at a mean age of 67.7 years. Median treatment duration was 11.5 months (median follow-up, 13.8 months), and nearly half (49.5%) of patients initiated FEDR at the label-indicated dose of 400 mg daily. Six months post-initiation, 77.7% and 66.8% of patients experienced symptom and spleen response, respectively. Kaplan-Meier estimates of median progression-free and overall survival from initiation were 23.8 months (95% CI, 21.1-27.6) and 29.8 months (95% CI, 23.9-NE), respectively.Conclusion: These findings demonstrate real-world FEDR effectiveness among patients with myelofibrosis who discontinued RUX.","PeriodicalId":12672,"journal":{"name":"Future oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1-13"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14796694.2025.2454895","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Assess real-world fedratinib (FEDR) treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in patients with primary or secondary myelofibrosis following discontinuation of ruxolitinib (RUX).

Patients & methods: This study was a retrospective, noninterventional medical record review of patients in Canada, Germany, and the United Kingdom (UK). A total of 70 physicians (primarily hematologist-oncologists [78.6%]) provided data for 196 eligible patients.

Results: Patients were mostly male (62.8%) with primary myelofibrosis (76.5%) and initiated FEDR at a mean age of 67.7 years. Median treatment duration was 11.5 months (median follow-up, 13.8 months), and nearly half (49.5%) of patients initiated FEDR at the label-indicated dose of 400 mg daily. Six months post-initiation, 77.7% and 66.8% of patients experienced symptom and spleen response, respectively. Kaplan-Meier estimates of median progression-free and overall survival from initiation were 23.8 months (95% CI, 21.1-27.6) and 29.8 months (95% CI, 23.9-NE), respectively.

Conclusion: These findings demonstrate real-world FEDR effectiveness among patients with myelofibrosis who discontinued RUX.

查看原文本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Future oncology ONCOLOGY-

CiteScore

5.40

自引率

3.00%

发文量

335

审稿时长

4-8 weeks

期刊介绍： Future Oncology (ISSN 1479-6694) provides a forum for a new era of cancer care. The journal focuses on the most important advances and highlights their relevance in the clinical setting. Furthermore, Future Oncology delivers essential information in concise, at-a-glance article formats - vital in delivering information to an increasingly time-constrained community. The journal takes a forward-looking stance toward the scientific and clinical issues, together with the economic and policy issues that confront us in this new era of cancer care. The journal includes literature awareness such as the latest developments in radiotherapy and immunotherapy, concise commentary and analysis, and full review articles all of which provide key findings, translational to the clinical setting.