Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) for acute poisonings in United States: a retrospective analysis of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry.

IF 3 3区 医学 Q2 TOXICOLOGY
Clinical Toxicology Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-27 DOI:10.1080/15563650.2024.2447496
Hong K Kim, Andrew O Piner, Lauren N Day, Kevin M Jones, Danilo Alunnifegatelli, Matteo Di Nardo
{"title":"Veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV-ECMO) for acute poisonings in United States: a retrospective analysis of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry.","authors":"Hong K Kim, Andrew O Piner, Lauren N Day, Kevin M Jones, Danilo Alunnifegatelli, Matteo Di Nardo","doi":"10.1080/15563650.2024.2447496","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is frequently considered and implemented to help manage patients with cardiogenic shock from acute poisoning. However, utilization of veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in acutely poisoned patients is largely unknown.</p><p><strong>Method: </strong>We conducted a retrospective study analyzing the epidemiologic, clinical characteristics and survival of acutely poisoned patients placed on veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation using the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization registry. Adult cases in the United States were included after a systematic search of the registry between January 1, 2003, and November 30, 2019. Study outcomes included survival to discharge, time to cannulation, and changes in metabolic, hemodynamic, and ventilatory parameters stratified by survival.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred and seventeen cases were included in the analysis after excluding 216 non-poisoning-related cases. Their median age was 34 years and 69.2% were male. Opioids (45.3%) were most commonly implicated, followed by neurologic drugs (e.g., antidepressants, antiepileptics) (14.5%) and smoke inhalation (13.7%); 23 patients (19.7%) had a pre-extracorporeal membrane oxygenation cardiac arrest. The median time from admission to extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was 47 h with a median duration of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support of 146.5 h. Survivors were cannulated significantly earlier than non-survivors (25 h versus 123 h; <i>P</i> = 0.02). Eighty-four patients (71.2%) survived to hospital discharge. Clinical parameters (hemodynamic, metabolic, and ventilatory) improved with veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support, but no statistically significant difference was noted between survivors and non-survivors.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Our study showed that veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was infrequently utilized for poisoning-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome. Opioids were the most frequently reported exposure among the cases in which indirect lung injury may have occurred from aspiration. Although no specific clinical parameters were associated with survival, early initiation of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation may improve clinical outcomes.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The use of veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory respiratory failure due to poisoning was associated with a clinically significant survival benefit compared to other respiratory diagnoses requiring veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.</p>","PeriodicalId":10430,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Toxicology","volume":" ","pages":"204-211"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15563650.2024.2447496","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TOXICOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is frequently considered and implemented to help manage patients with cardiogenic shock from acute poisoning. However, utilization of veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in acutely poisoned patients is largely unknown.

Method: We conducted a retrospective study analyzing the epidemiologic, clinical characteristics and survival of acutely poisoned patients placed on veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation using the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization registry. Adult cases in the United States were included after a systematic search of the registry between January 1, 2003, and November 30, 2019. Study outcomes included survival to discharge, time to cannulation, and changes in metabolic, hemodynamic, and ventilatory parameters stratified by survival.

Results: One hundred and seventeen cases were included in the analysis after excluding 216 non-poisoning-related cases. Their median age was 34 years and 69.2% were male. Opioids (45.3%) were most commonly implicated, followed by neurologic drugs (e.g., antidepressants, antiepileptics) (14.5%) and smoke inhalation (13.7%); 23 patients (19.7%) had a pre-extracorporeal membrane oxygenation cardiac arrest. The median time from admission to extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was 47 h with a median duration of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support of 146.5 h. Survivors were cannulated significantly earlier than non-survivors (25 h versus 123 h; P = 0.02). Eighty-four patients (71.2%) survived to hospital discharge. Clinical parameters (hemodynamic, metabolic, and ventilatory) improved with veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support, but no statistically significant difference was noted between survivors and non-survivors.

Discussion: Our study showed that veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was infrequently utilized for poisoning-associated acute respiratory distress syndrome. Opioids were the most frequently reported exposure among the cases in which indirect lung injury may have occurred from aspiration. Although no specific clinical parameters were associated with survival, early initiation of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation may improve clinical outcomes.

Conclusions: The use of veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory respiratory failure due to poisoning was associated with a clinically significant survival benefit compared to other respiratory diagnoses requiring veno-venous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation.

静脉-静脉体外膜氧合(VV-ECMO)治疗急性中毒在美国:对体外生命支持组织注册的回顾性分析。
静脉-动脉体外膜氧合经常被考虑和实施,以帮助管理急性中毒心源性休克患者。然而,静脉-静脉体外膜氧合在急性中毒患者中的应用在很大程度上是未知的。方法:回顾性分析体外生命支持组织(extracorporeal Life Support Organization)登记的静脉-静脉体外膜氧合急性中毒患者的流行病学、临床特征和生存率。在2003年1月1日至2019年11月30日期间对登记处进行系统搜索后,纳入了美国的成人病例。研究结果包括存活至出院、插管时间、代谢、血流动力学和通气参数的变化。结果:剔除216例非中毒相关病例后,纳入117例分析。他们的中位年龄为34岁,69.2%为男性。阿片类药物(45.3%)最为常见,其次是神经系统药物(如抗抑郁药、抗癫痫药)(14.5%)和烟雾吸入(13.7%);23例(19.7%)发生体外膜前氧合心脏骤停。从入院到体外膜氧合的中位时间为47 h,体外膜氧合支持的中位时间为146.5 h。存活者插管时间明显早于非存活者(25 h vs 123 h;p = 0.02)。84例(71.2%)存活至出院。临床参数(血流动力学、代谢和通气)在静脉-静脉体外膜氧合支持下得到改善,但在幸存者和非幸存者之间没有统计学上的显著差异。讨论:我们的研究显示静脉-静脉体外膜氧合很少用于中毒相关的急性呼吸窘迫综合征。阿片类药物是最常见的报告接触病例中,间接肺损伤可能由吸入发生。虽然没有特定的临床参数与生存相关,但早期开始体外膜氧合可能改善临床结果。结论:与其他需要静脉-静脉体外膜氧合的呼吸道诊断相比,使用静脉-静脉体外膜氧合治疗中毒引起的难治性呼吸衰竭具有显著的临床生存益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Toxicology
Clinical Toxicology 医学-毒理学
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
12.10%
发文量
148
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: clinical Toxicology publishes peer-reviewed scientific research and clinical advances in clinical toxicology. The journal reflects the professional concerns and best scientific judgment of its sponsors, the American Academy of Clinical Toxicology, the European Association of Poisons Centres and Clinical Toxicologists, the American Association of Poison Control Centers and the Asia Pacific Association of Medical Toxicology and, as such, is the leading international journal in the specialty.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信