Effect of enhanced recovery after surgery on older patients undergoing transvaginal pelvic floor reconstruction surgery: a randomised controlled trial.

IF 7 1区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Xuezhu Huang, Sisi Deng, Xiaofeng Lei, Shentao Lu, Ling Dai, Chunyan She
{"title":"Effect of enhanced recovery after surgery on older patients undergoing transvaginal pelvic floor reconstruction surgery: a randomised controlled trial.","authors":"Xuezhu Huang, Sisi Deng, Xiaofeng Lei, Shentao Lu, Ling Dai, Chunyan She","doi":"10.1186/s12916-025-03880-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Prospective trial evidence is lacking regarding the application of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in transvaginal pelvic floor reconstruction surgery among older patients. Our study aimed to investigate whether implementing the ERAS protocol could enhance post-operative recovery in this patient population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Older patients undergoing elective transvaginal pelvic floor reconstruction surgery were randomly assigned to either the ERAS group or the conventional group. The primary outcome was post-operative length of stay (LOS). The secondary outcomes encompassed other post-operative recovery metrics, post-operative pain within 30 days, the occurrence of complications, the peri-operative blood test and cognitive function.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A cohort of 100 patients was enrolled. Implementation of the ERAS protocol significantly reduced the duration of post-operative LOS (74.00 (69.00, 96.00) vs. 65.00 (59.00, 78.25) h, P < 0.01). Additionally, the ERAS protocol significantly reduced the duration of the first oral intake post-operatively (5.00 (2.50, 7.00) vs. 3.00 (2.00, 4.00) h, P = 0.01), and reduced rest and movement-related pain within 48 h post-operatively, effects that persisted through the 7-day follow-up period. It also shortened the duration of post-operative laryngeal mask airway support and promoted opioid-sparing. Moreover, the incidence and severity of post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV) were significantly lower in the ERAS group compared to the conventional group at 12 h post-operatively.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Implementation of the ERAS protocol can expedite post-operative recovery in older patients undergoing transvaginal pelvic floor reconstruction surgery, achieve opioid-sparing, alleviate pain post-operatively, and decrease the incidence of complications.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>This study was retrospectively registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (registration number: ChiCTR2400084608). The date of first registration was 21/05/2024.</p>","PeriodicalId":9188,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medicine","volume":"23 1","pages":"43"},"PeriodicalIF":7.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11771124/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-025-03880-y","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Prospective trial evidence is lacking regarding the application of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) in transvaginal pelvic floor reconstruction surgery among older patients. Our study aimed to investigate whether implementing the ERAS protocol could enhance post-operative recovery in this patient population.

Methods: Older patients undergoing elective transvaginal pelvic floor reconstruction surgery were randomly assigned to either the ERAS group or the conventional group. The primary outcome was post-operative length of stay (LOS). The secondary outcomes encompassed other post-operative recovery metrics, post-operative pain within 30 days, the occurrence of complications, the peri-operative blood test and cognitive function.

Results: A cohort of 100 patients was enrolled. Implementation of the ERAS protocol significantly reduced the duration of post-operative LOS (74.00 (69.00, 96.00) vs. 65.00 (59.00, 78.25) h, P < 0.01). Additionally, the ERAS protocol significantly reduced the duration of the first oral intake post-operatively (5.00 (2.50, 7.00) vs. 3.00 (2.00, 4.00) h, P = 0.01), and reduced rest and movement-related pain within 48 h post-operatively, effects that persisted through the 7-day follow-up period. It also shortened the duration of post-operative laryngeal mask airway support and promoted opioid-sparing. Moreover, the incidence and severity of post-operative nausea and vomiting (PONV) were significantly lower in the ERAS group compared to the conventional group at 12 h post-operatively.

Conclusions: Implementation of the ERAS protocol can expedite post-operative recovery in older patients undergoing transvaginal pelvic floor reconstruction surgery, achieve opioid-sparing, alleviate pain post-operatively, and decrease the incidence of complications.

Trial registration: This study was retrospectively registered with the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (registration number: ChiCTR2400084608). The date of first registration was 21/05/2024.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
BMC Medicine
BMC Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
13.10
自引率
1.10%
发文量
435
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: BMC Medicine is an open access, transparent peer-reviewed general medical journal. It is the flagship journal of the BMC series and publishes outstanding and influential research in various areas including clinical practice, translational medicine, medical and health advances, public health, global health, policy, and general topics of interest to the biomedical and sociomedical professional communities. In addition to research articles, the journal also publishes stimulating debates, reviews, unique forum articles, and concise tutorials. All articles published in BMC Medicine are included in various databases such as Biological Abstracts, BIOSIS, CAS, Citebase, Current contents, DOAJ, Embase, MEDLINE, PubMed, Science Citation Index Expanded, OAIster, SCImago, Scopus, SOCOLAR, and Zetoc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信