Effects of polymyxin B haemoperfusion on septic shock caused by Gram-positive bacteria.

IF 1.1 4区 医学 Q3 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Anaesthesia and Intensive Care Pub Date : 2025-03-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-27 DOI:10.1177/0310057X241284300
Soichi Tanaka, Junpei Haruna, Satoshi Kazuma, Hiroomi Tatsumi, Yoshiki Masuda
{"title":"Effects of polymyxin B haemoperfusion on septic shock caused by Gram-positive bacteria.","authors":"Soichi Tanaka, Junpei Haruna, Satoshi Kazuma, Hiroomi Tatsumi, Yoshiki Masuda","doi":"10.1177/0310057X241284300","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Polymyxin B haemoperfusion is commonly used to adsorb endotoxins in septic shock caused by Gram-negative bacterial infections. Polymyxin B haemoperfusion has been reported to improve hypotension in Gram-positive bacterial infections; however, its efficacy and mechanism in treating such cases are unclear. We hypothesised that polymyxin B haemoperfusion would be equally effective in improving haemodynamics during Gram-positive bacterial infections as in Gram-negative bacterial infections. We conducted a retrospective study that included patients with septic shock admitted to the intensive care unit. The patients were divided into two groups according to bacterial culture results: Gram-negative rod (GNR) and Gram-positive coccus (GPC). We calculated the vasoactive inotropic score (VIS) before (0 h) and 2, 6, 12 and 24 h after polymyxin B haemoperfusion therapy. Data were analysed using two-way analysis of variance and post hoc tests for the associations between infection type and treatment time. Overall, 157 patients with septic shock were enrolled in the study: 81 and 76 patients were treated or not treated with extracorporeal haemoperfusion therapy, respectively. Although there was no significant difference in the VIS in polymyxin B haemoperfusion between patients with GNR and GPC infections, there was a significant decrease in the VIS over time, even when GPC was the causative organism. In addition, the degree of reduction in the VIS was significantly different in both the GNR and GPC groups compared with that in the non-extracorporeally treated group. Thus, polymyxin B haemoperfusion for septic shock caused by GNR reduced the VIS and could be effective even in cases of GPC infection.</p>","PeriodicalId":7746,"journal":{"name":"Anaesthesia and Intensive Care","volume":" ","pages":"125-135"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anaesthesia and Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/0310057X241284300","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/27 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Polymyxin B haemoperfusion is commonly used to adsorb endotoxins in septic shock caused by Gram-negative bacterial infections. Polymyxin B haemoperfusion has been reported to improve hypotension in Gram-positive bacterial infections; however, its efficacy and mechanism in treating such cases are unclear. We hypothesised that polymyxin B haemoperfusion would be equally effective in improving haemodynamics during Gram-positive bacterial infections as in Gram-negative bacterial infections. We conducted a retrospective study that included patients with septic shock admitted to the intensive care unit. The patients were divided into two groups according to bacterial culture results: Gram-negative rod (GNR) and Gram-positive coccus (GPC). We calculated the vasoactive inotropic score (VIS) before (0 h) and 2, 6, 12 and 24 h after polymyxin B haemoperfusion therapy. Data were analysed using two-way analysis of variance and post hoc tests for the associations between infection type and treatment time. Overall, 157 patients with septic shock were enrolled in the study: 81 and 76 patients were treated or not treated with extracorporeal haemoperfusion therapy, respectively. Although there was no significant difference in the VIS in polymyxin B haemoperfusion between patients with GNR and GPC infections, there was a significant decrease in the VIS over time, even when GPC was the causative organism. In addition, the degree of reduction in the VIS was significantly different in both the GNR and GPC groups compared with that in the non-extracorporeally treated group. Thus, polymyxin B haemoperfusion for septic shock caused by GNR reduced the VIS and could be effective even in cases of GPC infection.

多粘菌素B血灌流对革兰氏阳性菌感染性休克的影响。
多粘菌素B血灌流常用于革兰氏阴性菌感染所致感染性休克的内毒素吸附。据报道,多粘菌素B血液灌流可改善革兰氏阳性细菌感染的低血压;然而,其治疗此类病例的疗效和机制尚不清楚。我们假设,在革兰氏阳性细菌感染期间,多粘菌素B血液灌流在改善血流动力学方面与革兰氏阴性细菌感染同样有效。我们进行了一项回顾性研究,纳入了重症监护病房的脓毒性休克患者。根据细菌培养结果将患者分为革兰氏阴性杆状菌(GNR)和革兰氏阳性球菌(GPC)两组。计算多粘菌素B血液灌流治疗前(0 h)和治疗后2、6、12、24 h血管活性肌力评分(VIS)。使用双向方差分析和事后检验来分析感染类型和治疗时间之间的关系。总共有157例脓毒性休克患者入组研究:分别有81例和76例患者接受了体外血液灌流治疗或未接受体外血液灌流治疗。虽然GNR和GPC感染患者的多粘菌素B血灌流VIS没有显著差异,但随着时间的推移,即使GPC是致病生物,VIS也会显著下降。此外,GNR组和GPC组与非体外治疗组相比,VIS的减少程度有显著差异。因此,多粘菌素B血液灌流治疗GNR引起的感染性休克可降低VIS,即使在GPC感染病例中也可能有效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
13.30%
发文量
150
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Anaesthesia and Intensive Care is an international journal publishing timely, peer reviewed articles that have educational value and scientific merit for clinicians and researchers associated with anaesthesia, intensive care medicine, and pain medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信