Characterizing Wellness Initiatives in Academic Radiation Oncology Departments

IF 2.2 Q3 ONCOLOGY

Advances in Radiation Oncology Pub Date : 2025-02-01 DOI:10.1016/j.adro.2024.101691

Sara Beltrán Ponce MD , Crystal Seldon Taswell MD , Idalid Franco MD, MPH , Malcolm D. Mattes MD , Tracy Kelly MD , Leah Katz MD, MPH

{"title":"Characterizing Wellness Initiatives in Academic Radiation Oncology Departments","authors":"Sara Beltrán Ponce MD , Crystal Seldon Taswell MD , Idalid Franco MD, MPH , Malcolm D. Mattes MD , Tracy Kelly MD , Leah Katz MD, MPH","doi":"10.1016/j.adro.2024.101691","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Purpose</h3><div>Burnout is prevalent in radiation oncology (RO), and an increased focus on promoting physician wellness and formalizing wellness-directed efforts has transpired in recent years. We aimed to characterize current wellness leadership positions and efforts within academic RO departments.</div></div><div><h3>Methods and Materials</h3><div>Academic RO department chairs were contacted to inquire whether they had a departmental wellness leader with a request for leader contact information, if applicable. Wellness leaders were invited to complete an anonymous survey in January and February 2023 using Qualtrics. Questions assessed leader demographic characteristics, role structure and resources, current initiatives, and impacts to date. Descriptive statistics and summaries of free-text responses are reported.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 120 chairs were contacted. In total, 71 (59%) responded, with 43 (61%) having departmental wellness leaders, of which 17 (39.5%) responded, to the survey. A total of 70.6% were female, and 76.5% were physician faculty. Most respondents were early-career. The most common previously implemented initiatives included offering programming and education (33.3%) and improved access to mental health services (25%). The most common active initiatives include conducting studies to address root causes of burnout (41.7%), developing specific wellness goals (25%), performing a review of policies that encourage prolonged work hours (25%), and offering programming and education (25%). Challenges included limited bandwidth (66.7%), lack of funding (41.7%), and lack of departmental interest in organizing or attending events (33.3%). Leaders highlight the importance of a dedicated individual to tangibly implement changes and the unique opportunity of someone within RO to understand the specific challenges faced by those in our field.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Wellness leadership roles exist in many RO departments. As evidenced by a limited number of fully implemented initiatives, these roles are new and evolving. A focus on wellness has the potential to bring positive change to departments; however, the impact of newly established wellness roles on culture and balance requires longitudinal followup.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7390,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Radiation Oncology","volume":"10 2","pages":"Article 101691"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11757214/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Radiation Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452109424002549","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose

Burnout is prevalent in radiation oncology (RO), and an increased focus on promoting physician wellness and formalizing wellness-directed efforts has transpired in recent years. We aimed to characterize current wellness leadership positions and efforts within academic RO departments.

Methods and Materials

Academic RO department chairs were contacted to inquire whether they had a departmental wellness leader with a request for leader contact information, if applicable. Wellness leaders were invited to complete an anonymous survey in January and February 2023 using Qualtrics. Questions assessed leader demographic characteristics, role structure and resources, current initiatives, and impacts to date. Descriptive statistics and summaries of free-text responses are reported.

Results

A total of 120 chairs were contacted. In total, 71 (59%) responded, with 43 (61%) having departmental wellness leaders, of which 17 (39.5%) responded, to the survey. A total of 70.6% were female, and 76.5% were physician faculty. Most respondents were early-career. The most common previously implemented initiatives included offering programming and education (33.3%) and improved access to mental health services (25%). The most common active initiatives include conducting studies to address root causes of burnout (41.7%), developing specific wellness goals (25%), performing a review of policies that encourage prolonged work hours (25%), and offering programming and education (25%). Challenges included limited bandwidth (66.7%), lack of funding (41.7%), and lack of departmental interest in organizing or attending events (33.3%). Leaders highlight the importance of a dedicated individual to tangibly implement changes and the unique opportunity of someone within RO to understand the specific challenges faced by those in our field.

Conclusions

Wellness leadership roles exist in many RO departments. As evidenced by a limited number of fully implemented initiatives, these roles are new and evolving. A focus on wellness has the potential to bring positive change to departments; however, the impact of newly established wellness roles on culture and balance requires longitudinal followup.

查看原文本刊更多论文

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Advances in Radiation Oncology Medicine-Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging

CiteScore

4.60

自引率

4.30%

发文量

208

审稿时长

98 days

期刊介绍： The purpose of Advances is to provide information for clinicians who use radiation therapy by publishing: Clinical trial reports and reanalyses. Basic science original reports. Manuscripts examining health services research, comparative and cost effectiveness research, and systematic reviews. Case reports documenting unusual problems and solutions. High quality multi and single institutional series, as well as other novel retrospective hypothesis generating series. Timely critical reviews on important topics in radiation oncology, such as side effects. Articles reporting the natural history of disease and patterns of failure, particularly as they relate to treatment volume delineation. Articles on safety and quality in radiation therapy. Essays on clinical experience. Articles on practice transformation in radiation oncology, in particular: Aspects of health policy that may impact the future practice of radiation oncology. How information technology, such as data analytics and systems innovations, will change radiation oncology practice. Articles on imaging as they relate to radiation therapy treatment.