Multicenter validation of secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis diagnostic criteria

IF 9 2区 医学 Q1 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Gunnar Lachmann, Patrick Heeren, Friederike S. Schuster, Peter Nyvlt, Claudia Spies, Insa Feinkohl, Thomas Schenk, Wafa Ammouri, France Debaugnies, Lionel Galicier, Yuan Jia, Nikhil Meena, Carole Nagant, Olaf Neth, Stefan Nierkens, Juan San Martin, Hao Wei (Linda) Sun, Yini Wang, Zhao Wang, Jae-Ho Yoon, Frank M. Brunkhorst, Paul La Rosée, Gritta Janka, Cornelia Lachmann
{"title":"Multicenter validation of secondary hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis diagnostic criteria","authors":"Gunnar Lachmann,&nbsp;Patrick Heeren,&nbsp;Friederike S. Schuster,&nbsp;Peter Nyvlt,&nbsp;Claudia Spies,&nbsp;Insa Feinkohl,&nbsp;Thomas Schenk,&nbsp;Wafa Ammouri,&nbsp;France Debaugnies,&nbsp;Lionel Galicier,&nbsp;Yuan Jia,&nbsp;Nikhil Meena,&nbsp;Carole Nagant,&nbsp;Olaf Neth,&nbsp;Stefan Nierkens,&nbsp;Juan San Martin,&nbsp;Hao Wei (Linda) Sun,&nbsp;Yini Wang,&nbsp;Zhao Wang,&nbsp;Jae-Ho Yoon,&nbsp;Frank M. Brunkhorst,&nbsp;Paul La Rosée,&nbsp;Gritta Janka,&nbsp;Cornelia Lachmann","doi":"10.1111/joim.20065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background:</h3>\n \n <p>Five fulfilled hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH)-2004 criteria, and the HScore are widely used and recommended by international expert consensus to diagnose secondary HLH. Both diagnostic scores have never been validated in heterogeneous patient cohorts of secondary HLH patients. We aimed to systematically optimize and validate diagnostic criteria of secondary HLH using a multicenter approach.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods:</h3>\n \n <p>We developed optimized criteria in our cohort of critically ill patients as a first step. We next validated these new criteria together with the original and modified HLH-2004 criteria as well as the HScore using original data of 13 published cohorts, which were identified by a systematic literature search.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results:</h3>\n \n <p>The best performing HLH diagnostic criteria sets over all 13 validation cohorts were the original HLH-2004 criteria with a decreased cut-off (cut-off 4, mean sensitivity 86.5%, mean specificity 86.1%), followed by the revised HLH-2004 criteria (natural killer cell activity removed; cut-off 4, mean sensitivity 83.8%, mean specificity 87.8%) and the HScore (cut-off 169, mean sensitivity 82.4%, mean specificity 87.6%). Our newly developed HLH diagnostic criteria showed inferior performance. Ferritin ≥500 µg/L had 94.0% mean sensitivity over all cohorts.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions:</h3>\n \n <p>In this first multicenter validation study, four fulfilled HLH-2004 criteria and an HScore of 169 were suitable to diagnose secondary HLH, which will lead to rapid diagnosis and improved patient outcomes. Ferritin proved as a reliable HLH screening marker. Our results should be taken into account in clinical recommendations and in designing new studies.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":196,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Internal Medicine","volume":"297 3","pages":"312-327"},"PeriodicalIF":9.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/joim.20065","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/joim.20065","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background:

Five fulfilled hemophagocytic lymphohistiocytosis (HLH)-2004 criteria, and the HScore are widely used and recommended by international expert consensus to diagnose secondary HLH. Both diagnostic scores have never been validated in heterogeneous patient cohorts of secondary HLH patients. We aimed to systematically optimize and validate diagnostic criteria of secondary HLH using a multicenter approach.

Methods:

We developed optimized criteria in our cohort of critically ill patients as a first step. We next validated these new criteria together with the original and modified HLH-2004 criteria as well as the HScore using original data of 13 published cohorts, which were identified by a systematic literature search.

Results:

The best performing HLH diagnostic criteria sets over all 13 validation cohorts were the original HLH-2004 criteria with a decreased cut-off (cut-off 4, mean sensitivity 86.5%, mean specificity 86.1%), followed by the revised HLH-2004 criteria (natural killer cell activity removed; cut-off 4, mean sensitivity 83.8%, mean specificity 87.8%) and the HScore (cut-off 169, mean sensitivity 82.4%, mean specificity 87.6%). Our newly developed HLH diagnostic criteria showed inferior performance. Ferritin ≥500 µg/L had 94.0% mean sensitivity over all cohorts.

Conclusions:

In this first multicenter validation study, four fulfilled HLH-2004 criteria and an HScore of 169 were suitable to diagnose secondary HLH, which will lead to rapid diagnosis and improved patient outcomes. Ferritin proved as a reliable HLH screening marker. Our results should be taken into account in clinical recommendations and in designing new studies.

Abstract Image

继发性噬血细胞淋巴组织细胞增多症诊断标准的多中心验证。
背景:有5人符合嗜血球性淋巴组织细胞增生症(HLH)-2004标准,HScore被广泛使用并被国际专家共识推荐用于诊断继发性HLH。两种诊断评分从未在继发性HLH患者的异质患者队列中得到验证。我们的目的是通过多中心方法系统地优化和验证继发性HLH的诊断标准。方法:作为第一步,我们在重症患者队列中制定了优化的标准。接下来,我们通过系统的文献检索确定了13个已发表的队列的原始数据,将这些新标准与原始和修改后的hh -2004标准以及HScore一起验证。结果:在所有13个验证队列中,表现最好的HLH诊断标准集是原始的HLH-2004标准,其临界值降低(临界值4,平均敏感性86.5%,平均特异性86.1%),其次是修订的HLH-2004标准(去除自然杀伤细胞活性;cut-off 4,平均敏感性83.8%,平均特异性87.8%)和HScore (cut-off 169,平均敏感性82.4%,平均特异性87.6%)。我们新制定的HLH诊断标准表现不佳。铁蛋白≥500µg/L在所有队列中平均敏感性为94.0%。结论:在首次多中心验证研究中,4例符合HLH-2004标准,HScore为169适合诊断继发性HLH,这将导致快速诊断和改善患者预后。铁蛋白被证明是一种可靠的HLH筛选标志物。我们的结果应该在临床推荐和设计新研究时加以考虑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Internal Medicine
Journal of Internal Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
22.00
自引率
0.90%
发文量
176
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: JIM – The Journal of Internal Medicine, in continuous publication since 1863, is an international, peer-reviewed scientific journal. It publishes original work in clinical science, spanning from bench to bedside, encompassing a wide range of internal medicine and its subspecialties. JIM showcases original articles, reviews, brief reports, and research letters in the field of internal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信