Koen Johannes Anthonius Verhagen, Ilse Henrike Pardijs, Hendrik Matthijs van Klaveren, Sebastian Aljoscha Wahl
{"title":"A Dive Into Yeast's Sugar Diet—Comparing the Metabolic Response of Glucose, Fructose, Sucrose, and Maltose Under Dynamic Feast/Famine Conditions","authors":"Koen Johannes Anthonius Verhagen, Ilse Henrike Pardijs, Hendrik Matthijs van Klaveren, Sebastian Aljoscha Wahl","doi":"10.1002/bit.28935","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Microbes experience dynamic conditions in natural habitats as well as in engineered environments, such as large-scale bioreactors, which exhibit increased mixing times and inhomogeneities. While single perturbations have been studied for several organisms and substrates, the impact of recurring short-term perturbations remains largely unknown. In this study, we investigated the response of <i>Saccharomyces cerevisiae</i> to repetitive gradients of four different sugars: glucose, fructose, sucrose, and maltose. Due to different transport mechanisms and metabolic routes, nonglucose sugars lead to varied intracellular responses. To characterize the impact of the carbon sources and the dynamic substrate gradients, we applied both steady-state and dynamic cultivation conditions, comparing the physiology, intracellular metabolome, and proteome. For maltose, the repeated concentration gradients led to a significant decrease in biomass yield. Under glucose, fructose, and sucrose conditions, <i>S. cerevisiae</i> maintained the biomass yield observed under steady-state conditions. Although the physiology was very similar across the different sugars, the intracellular metabolome and proteome were clearly differentiated. Notably, the concentration of upper glycolytic enzymes decreased for glucose and maltose (up to −60% and −40%, respectively), while an increase was observed for sucrose and fructose when exposed to gradients. Nevertheless, for all sugar gradient conditions, a stable energy charge was maintained, ranging between 0.78 and 0.89. This response to maltose is particularly distinct compared to previous single-substrate pulse experiments or limitation to excess shifts, which led to maltose-accelerated death in earlier studies. At the same time, enzymes of lower glycolysis were elevated. Interestingly, common stress-related proteins (GO term: cellular response to oxidative stress) decreased during dynamic conditions.</p>","PeriodicalId":9168,"journal":{"name":"Biotechnology and Bioengineering","volume":"122 4","pages":"1035-1050"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/bit.28935","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biotechnology and Bioengineering","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/bit.28935","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Microbes experience dynamic conditions in natural habitats as well as in engineered environments, such as large-scale bioreactors, which exhibit increased mixing times and inhomogeneities. While single perturbations have been studied for several organisms and substrates, the impact of recurring short-term perturbations remains largely unknown. In this study, we investigated the response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae to repetitive gradients of four different sugars: glucose, fructose, sucrose, and maltose. Due to different transport mechanisms and metabolic routes, nonglucose sugars lead to varied intracellular responses. To characterize the impact of the carbon sources and the dynamic substrate gradients, we applied both steady-state and dynamic cultivation conditions, comparing the physiology, intracellular metabolome, and proteome. For maltose, the repeated concentration gradients led to a significant decrease in biomass yield. Under glucose, fructose, and sucrose conditions, S. cerevisiae maintained the biomass yield observed under steady-state conditions. Although the physiology was very similar across the different sugars, the intracellular metabolome and proteome were clearly differentiated. Notably, the concentration of upper glycolytic enzymes decreased for glucose and maltose (up to −60% and −40%, respectively), while an increase was observed for sucrose and fructose when exposed to gradients. Nevertheless, for all sugar gradient conditions, a stable energy charge was maintained, ranging between 0.78 and 0.89. This response to maltose is particularly distinct compared to previous single-substrate pulse experiments or limitation to excess shifts, which led to maltose-accelerated death in earlier studies. At the same time, enzymes of lower glycolysis were elevated. Interestingly, common stress-related proteins (GO term: cellular response to oxidative stress) decreased during dynamic conditions.
期刊介绍:
Biotechnology & Bioengineering publishes Perspectives, Articles, Reviews, Mini-Reviews, and Communications to the Editor that embrace all aspects of biotechnology. These include:
-Enzyme systems and their applications, including enzyme reactors, purification, and applied aspects of protein engineering
-Animal-cell biotechnology, including media development
-Applied aspects of cellular physiology, metabolism, and energetics
-Biocatalysis and applied enzymology, including enzyme reactors, protein engineering, and nanobiotechnology
-Biothermodynamics
-Biofuels, including biomass and renewable resource engineering
-Biomaterials, including delivery systems and materials for tissue engineering
-Bioprocess engineering, including kinetics and modeling of biological systems, transport phenomena in bioreactors, bioreactor design, monitoring, and control
-Biosensors and instrumentation
-Computational and systems biology, including bioinformatics and genomic/proteomic studies
-Environmental biotechnology, including biofilms, algal systems, and bioremediation
-Metabolic and cellular engineering
-Plant-cell biotechnology
-Spectroscopic and other analytical techniques for biotechnological applications
-Synthetic biology
-Tissue engineering, stem-cell bioengineering, regenerative medicine, gene therapy and delivery systems
The editors will consider papers for publication based on novelty, their immediate or future impact on biotechnological processes, and their contribution to the advancement of biochemical engineering science. Submission of papers dealing with routine aspects of bioprocessing, description of established equipment, and routine applications of established methodologies (e.g., control strategies, modeling, experimental methods) is discouraged. Theoretical papers will be judged based on the novelty of the approach and their potential impact, or on their novel capability to predict and elucidate experimental observations.