Indocyanine green for axillary sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with breast cancer (INSEAN study).

Sandra López Gordo, Iva Borisova, Neus Ruiz-Edo, David López-Cano, Marta De la Iglésia, Mario Giner Pichel, Maite Salcedo-Pujantell, Cristina Serra-Serra
{"title":"Indocyanine green for axillary sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with breast cancer (INSEAN study).","authors":"Sandra López Gordo, Iva Borisova, Neus Ruiz-Edo, David López-Cano, Marta De la Iglésia, Mario Giner Pichel, Maite Salcedo-Pujantell, Cristina Serra-Serra","doi":"10.1016/j.cireng.2024.11.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Sentinel lymph node (SLN) detection is the technique of choice for staging early-stage breast cancer (BC). The preferred technique for SLN detection is labelling with the radioisotope Technetium-99 (Tc-99). Other methods have been evaluated, including methylene blue, magnetic tracers, iodine seeds, or fluorescent substances. Various studies have shown the non-inferiority of indocyanine green (ICG) for SLN detection; however, inclusion criteria are selective and restrictive.</p><p><strong>Main and secondary hypotheses: </strong>Main hypotheses: SLN detection using ICG provides results that are not inferior to those obtained with Tc-99. Secondary hypotheses: METHODS AND DESIGN: This is a multicenter, prospective, observational study in BC patients undergoing primary or post-neoadjuvant surgery with SLN detection. INSEAN study (NCT: 06378944).</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>Patients of both sexes with cN0 BC undergoing primary surgery or cN1 with good axillary response post-neoadjuvant. The detected nodes will be classified according to the detection method used as \"Tc,\" \"Tc + ICG,\" or \"ICG.\" Final anatomopathological (AP) analysis will be conducted for comparison.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The SLN detection rates will be compared across techniques, along with potential adverse effects, definitive AP results, and costs between the two techniques.</p>","PeriodicalId":93935,"journal":{"name":"Cirugia espanola","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cirugia espanola","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cireng.2024.11.017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Sentinel lymph node (SLN) detection is the technique of choice for staging early-stage breast cancer (BC). The preferred technique for SLN detection is labelling with the radioisotope Technetium-99 (Tc-99). Other methods have been evaluated, including methylene blue, magnetic tracers, iodine seeds, or fluorescent substances. Various studies have shown the non-inferiority of indocyanine green (ICG) for SLN detection; however, inclusion criteria are selective and restrictive.

Main and secondary hypotheses: Main hypotheses: SLN detection using ICG provides results that are not inferior to those obtained with Tc-99. Secondary hypotheses: METHODS AND DESIGN: This is a multicenter, prospective, observational study in BC patients undergoing primary or post-neoadjuvant surgery with SLN detection. INSEAN study (NCT: 06378944).

Inclusion criteria: Patients of both sexes with cN0 BC undergoing primary surgery or cN1 with good axillary response post-neoadjuvant. The detected nodes will be classified according to the detection method used as "Tc," "Tc + ICG," or "ICG." Final anatomopathological (AP) analysis will be conducted for comparison.

Discussion: The SLN detection rates will be compared across techniques, along with potential adverse effects, definitive AP results, and costs between the two techniques.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信