Sandra López Gordo, Iva Borisova, Neus Ruiz-Edo, David López-Cano, Marta De la Iglésia, Mario Giner Pichel, Maite Salcedo-Pujantell, Cristina Serra-Serra
{"title":"Indocyanine green for axillary sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with breast cancer (INSEAN study).","authors":"Sandra López Gordo, Iva Borisova, Neus Ruiz-Edo, David López-Cano, Marta De la Iglésia, Mario Giner Pichel, Maite Salcedo-Pujantell, Cristina Serra-Serra","doi":"10.1016/j.cireng.2024.11.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Sentinel lymph node (SLN) detection is the technique of choice for staging early-stage breast cancer (BC). The preferred technique for SLN detection is labelling with the radioisotope Technetium-99 (Tc-99). Other methods have been evaluated, including methylene blue, magnetic tracers, iodine seeds, or fluorescent substances. Various studies have shown the non-inferiority of indocyanine green (ICG) for SLN detection; however, inclusion criteria are selective and restrictive.</p><p><strong>Main and secondary hypotheses: </strong>Main hypotheses: SLN detection using ICG provides results that are not inferior to those obtained with Tc-99. Secondary hypotheses: METHODS AND DESIGN: This is a multicenter, prospective, observational study in BC patients undergoing primary or post-neoadjuvant surgery with SLN detection. INSEAN study (NCT: 06378944).</p><p><strong>Inclusion criteria: </strong>Patients of both sexes with cN0 BC undergoing primary surgery or cN1 with good axillary response post-neoadjuvant. The detected nodes will be classified according to the detection method used as \"Tc,\" \"Tc + ICG,\" or \"ICG.\" Final anatomopathological (AP) analysis will be conducted for comparison.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>The SLN detection rates will be compared across techniques, along with potential adverse effects, definitive AP results, and costs between the two techniques.</p>","PeriodicalId":93935,"journal":{"name":"Cirugia espanola","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cirugia espanola","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cireng.2024.11.017","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Introduction: Sentinel lymph node (SLN) detection is the technique of choice for staging early-stage breast cancer (BC). The preferred technique for SLN detection is labelling with the radioisotope Technetium-99 (Tc-99). Other methods have been evaluated, including methylene blue, magnetic tracers, iodine seeds, or fluorescent substances. Various studies have shown the non-inferiority of indocyanine green (ICG) for SLN detection; however, inclusion criteria are selective and restrictive.
Main and secondary hypotheses: Main hypotheses: SLN detection using ICG provides results that are not inferior to those obtained with Tc-99. Secondary hypotheses: METHODS AND DESIGN: This is a multicenter, prospective, observational study in BC patients undergoing primary or post-neoadjuvant surgery with SLN detection. INSEAN study (NCT: 06378944).
Inclusion criteria: Patients of both sexes with cN0 BC undergoing primary surgery or cN1 with good axillary response post-neoadjuvant. The detected nodes will be classified according to the detection method used as "Tc," "Tc + ICG," or "ICG." Final anatomopathological (AP) analysis will be conducted for comparison.
Discussion: The SLN detection rates will be compared across techniques, along with potential adverse effects, definitive AP results, and costs between the two techniques.