Quantification and profiling of urine cells by integrated cytocentrifugation and infrared spectroscopy.

Víctor Navarro-Esteve, Birgit Felderer, Guillermo Quintás, Julia Kuligowski, Bayden R Wood, David Pérez-Guaita
{"title":"Quantification and profiling of urine cells by integrated cytocentrifugation and infrared spectroscopy.","authors":"Víctor Navarro-Esteve, Birgit Felderer, Guillermo Quintás, Julia Kuligowski, Bayden R Wood, David Pérez-Guaita","doi":"10.1016/j.saa.2025.125734","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The presence of cells in urine and in particular White Blood Cells (WBCs) is often associated with Urinary Tract Infections (UTIs) and other diseases. Non-invasive screening of WBCs requires the development of cost-effective point of care diagnostic tools. Infrared (IR) spectroscopy has the potential to identify and quantify cells in urine. However, the quantification of cells by compact IR spectrophotometers can be hindered by the presence of highly concentrated interfering biomolecules. The use of separation procedures can assist in identifying and quantifying cells but reduces the point of care capabilities of the technology. In this study, we propose coupling cytocentrifugation with transflection IR spectroscopy for the isolation and quantification of cells in urine. Urine samples were spiked with monocytes and T-lymphocytes, cyto-centrifuged onto low-e slides and measured in transflection mode. An optional cell clean-up step, either performed before (by resuspending in PBS) or after the cytocentrifugation (by soaking the slide in water), was evaluated. In a first experiment using monocytes, IR band areas were linear (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.98) in the 8 × 10<sup>3</sup>-2 × 10<sup>5</sup> cells mL<sup>-1</sup> range, thus demonstrating the detection of cells at pathological numbers (pyuria, i.e., >10<sup>4</sup> WBCs mL<sup>-1</sup>). Secondly, to mimic real samples with varying cell types, urine samples containing both monocytes and T-lymphocytes were analysed to determine their concentration simultaneously. Partial Least Squares (PLS) regression enabled the simultaneous quantification of two types of different cells, yielding prediction errors of 2 × 10<sup>4</sup> cells mL<sup>-1</sup> for monocytes and 4 × 10<sup>4</sup> cells mL<sup>-1</sup> for T-lymphocytes. The results suggest that the technique has the potential to be implemented as a fast, simple, versatile, and cost-effective method for quantifying and profiling cells in urine.</p>","PeriodicalId":94213,"journal":{"name":"Spectrochimica acta. Part A, Molecular and biomolecular spectroscopy","volume":"330 ","pages":"125734"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Spectrochimica acta. Part A, Molecular and biomolecular spectroscopy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2025.125734","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/12 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The presence of cells in urine and in particular White Blood Cells (WBCs) is often associated with Urinary Tract Infections (UTIs) and other diseases. Non-invasive screening of WBCs requires the development of cost-effective point of care diagnostic tools. Infrared (IR) spectroscopy has the potential to identify and quantify cells in urine. However, the quantification of cells by compact IR spectrophotometers can be hindered by the presence of highly concentrated interfering biomolecules. The use of separation procedures can assist in identifying and quantifying cells but reduces the point of care capabilities of the technology. In this study, we propose coupling cytocentrifugation with transflection IR spectroscopy for the isolation and quantification of cells in urine. Urine samples were spiked with monocytes and T-lymphocytes, cyto-centrifuged onto low-e slides and measured in transflection mode. An optional cell clean-up step, either performed before (by resuspending in PBS) or after the cytocentrifugation (by soaking the slide in water), was evaluated. In a first experiment using monocytes, IR band areas were linear (R2 = 0.98) in the 8 × 103-2 × 105 cells mL-1 range, thus demonstrating the detection of cells at pathological numbers (pyuria, i.e., >104 WBCs mL-1). Secondly, to mimic real samples with varying cell types, urine samples containing both monocytes and T-lymphocytes were analysed to determine their concentration simultaneously. Partial Least Squares (PLS) regression enabled the simultaneous quantification of two types of different cells, yielding prediction errors of 2 × 104 cells mL-1 for monocytes and 4 × 104 cells mL-1 for T-lymphocytes. The results suggest that the technique has the potential to be implemented as a fast, simple, versatile, and cost-effective method for quantifying and profiling cells in urine.

用综合细胞离心和红外光谱法定量分析尿液细胞。
尿中细胞,特别是白细胞(wbc)的存在通常与尿路感染(uti)和其他疾病有关。白细胞的非侵入性筛查需要开发具有成本效益的护理点诊断工具。红外(IR)光谱学具有鉴别和定量尿液细胞的潜力。然而,通过紧凑的红外分光光度计的细胞定量可以被高浓度的干扰生物分子的存在阻碍。使用分离程序可以帮助识别和定量细胞,但降低了该技术的护理点能力。在这项研究中,我们提出将细胞离心与透射红外光谱耦合用于尿液中细胞的分离和定量。尿液样本加入单核细胞和t淋巴细胞,细胞离心到low-e载玻片上,并在透射模式下测量。可选的细胞清理步骤,要么在之前(通过在PBS中重悬)进行,要么在细胞离心之后(通过在水中浸泡载玻片)进行评估。在第一个使用单核细胞的实验中,IR波段面积在8 × 103-2 × 105个细胞mL-1范围内呈线性(R2 = 0.98),从而表明检测到病理数量的细胞(脓尿,即bb0 - 104个白细胞mL-1)。其次,为了模拟具有不同细胞类型的真实样本,同时分析含有单核细胞和t淋巴细胞的尿液样本以确定其浓度。偏最小二乘(PLS)回归能够同时定量两种不同类型的细胞,单核细胞的预测误差为2 × 104细胞mL-1, t淋巴细胞的预测误差为4 × 104细胞mL-1。结果表明,该技术有潜力作为一种快速、简单、通用且具有成本效益的方法来定量和分析尿液中的细胞。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信