Machine-learning based risk prediction of outcomes in patients hospitalised with COVID-19 in Australia: the AUS-COVID score.

IF 4.7 2区 医学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Hari P Sritharan, Harrison Nguyen, William van Gaal, Leonard Kritharides, Clara K Chow, Ravinay Bhindi
{"title":"Machine-learning based risk prediction of outcomes in patients hospitalised with COVID-19 in Australia: the AUS-COVID score.","authors":"Hari P Sritharan, Harrison Nguyen, William van Gaal, Leonard Kritharides, Clara K Chow, Ravinay Bhindi","doi":"10.1093/jamia/ocaf016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to develop a highly interpretable and effective, machine-learning based risk prediction algorithm to predict in-hospital mortality, intubation and adverse cardiovascular events in patients hospitalised with COVID-19 in Australia (AUS-COVID Score).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This prospective study across 21 hospitals included 1714 consecutive patients aged ≥ 18 in their index hospitalization with COVID-19. The dataset was separated into training (80%) and test sets (20%). Eight supervised ML methods were used: LASSO, ridge, elastic net (EN), decision tree, support vector machine, random forest, AdaBoost and gradient boosting. A feature selection method was used to establish informative variables, which were considered in groups of 5/10/15/20/all. The final model was selected by balancing the optimal area under the curve (AUC) score with interpretability, through the number of included variables. The coefficients of the final models were used to build the AUS-COVID Score.</p><p><strong>Results & discussion: </strong>Among the patients, 181 (10.6%) died in-hospital, 148 (8.6%) required intubation and 90 (5.3%) had adverse cardiovascular events. The LASSO model performed best for predicting in-hospital mortality (AUC 0.85) using five variables: age, respiratory rate, COVID-19 features on chest X-ray (CXR), troponin elevation, and COVID-19 vaccination (≥1 dose). The Elastic Net model performed best for predicting intubation (AUC 0.75) and adverse cardiovascular events (AUC 0.64), each with five variables. A user-friendly web-based application was built for clinician use at the bedside.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The AUS-COVID Score is an accurate and practical, machine-learning-based risk score to predict in-hospital mortality, intubation, and adverse cardiovascular events in hospitalized COVID-19 patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":50016,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/jamia/ocaf016","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: We aimed to develop a highly interpretable and effective, machine-learning based risk prediction algorithm to predict in-hospital mortality, intubation and adverse cardiovascular events in patients hospitalised with COVID-19 in Australia (AUS-COVID Score).

Materials and methods: This prospective study across 21 hospitals included 1714 consecutive patients aged ≥ 18 in their index hospitalization with COVID-19. The dataset was separated into training (80%) and test sets (20%). Eight supervised ML methods were used: LASSO, ridge, elastic net (EN), decision tree, support vector machine, random forest, AdaBoost and gradient boosting. A feature selection method was used to establish informative variables, which were considered in groups of 5/10/15/20/all. The final model was selected by balancing the optimal area under the curve (AUC) score with interpretability, through the number of included variables. The coefficients of the final models were used to build the AUS-COVID Score.

Results & discussion: Among the patients, 181 (10.6%) died in-hospital, 148 (8.6%) required intubation and 90 (5.3%) had adverse cardiovascular events. The LASSO model performed best for predicting in-hospital mortality (AUC 0.85) using five variables: age, respiratory rate, COVID-19 features on chest X-ray (CXR), troponin elevation, and COVID-19 vaccination (≥1 dose). The Elastic Net model performed best for predicting intubation (AUC 0.75) and adverse cardiovascular events (AUC 0.64), each with five variables. A user-friendly web-based application was built for clinician use at the bedside.

Conclusion: The AUS-COVID Score is an accurate and practical, machine-learning-based risk score to predict in-hospital mortality, intubation, and adverse cardiovascular events in hospitalized COVID-19 patients.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association
Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association 医学-计算机:跨学科应用
CiteScore
14.50
自引率
7.80%
发文量
230
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: JAMIA is AMIA''s premier peer-reviewed journal for biomedical and health informatics. Covering the full spectrum of activities in the field, JAMIA includes informatics articles in the areas of clinical care, clinical research, translational science, implementation science, imaging, education, consumer health, public health, and policy. JAMIA''s articles describe innovative informatics research and systems that help to advance biomedical science and to promote health. Case reports, perspectives and reviews also help readers stay connected with the most important informatics developments in implementation, policy and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信