End-tidal carbon dioxide-guided extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation improves neurological prognosis in patients: a single-center retrospective cohort study

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Xiaozu Liao, Chen Gu, Zhou Cheng, Kepeng Liu, Qing Yin, Binfei Li
{"title":"End-tidal carbon dioxide-guided extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation improves neurological prognosis in patients: a single-center retrospective cohort study","authors":"Xiaozu Liao,&nbsp;Chen Gu,&nbsp;Zhou Cheng,&nbsp;Kepeng Liu,&nbsp;Qing Yin,&nbsp;Binfei Li","doi":"10.1016/j.bjane.2025.844588","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (ECPR) is an effective intervention for restoring adequate circulatory perfusion after cardiac arrest. Ensuring high-quality Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) before initiating Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) is critical to mitigate tissue hypoxia and ischemia. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide (ETCO<sub>2</sub>) Goal-Directed CPR (GDCPR) on neurological function before ECMO using a retrospective case-control analysis.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The medical records of all patients who received ECPR treated at Zhongshan City People's Hospital were collected between January 2020 and March 2023. In this retrospective cohort study, the patients were divided into Conventional CPR (CCPR) and ETCO<sub>2</sub>-GDCPR groups based on whether ETCO<sub>2</sub> was used as a guide for CPR.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>A total of 71 patients were included, of whom 46 comprised the CCPR group and 25 comprised the GDCPR group. Approximately 37% of patients who received ECPR had good cerebral function at discharge, with a higher rate in the GDCPR group (52%) compared with the CCPR group (28%) (p = 0.047). Multivariate analysis showed that the Highest Interleukin-6 (H-IL6) levels after ECMO (Odds Ratio [OR = 1.001], 95% Confidence Interval [95% CI 1.000–1.003], p = 0.005) was a risk factor for neurological function at discharge. The other risk factors for poor prognosis in patients who received ECPR included pre-ECMO CPR protocols (OR = 10.74, 95% CI 1.90–60.48, p = 0.007) and IL6 levels after ECMO (OR = 1.002, 95% CI 1.001–1.003, p = 0.005). ECMO duration (OR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.74–0.94, p = 0.002) was identified as a protective factor. Patients with short ECMO duration have a poor prognosis. The area under the curve for ECMO duration was 0.86 (0.77–0.94, p &lt; 0.01), while that for H-IL6 was 0.19 (0.09–0.29, p &lt; 0.01).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>ETCO<sub>2</sub>-guided ECPR is associated with improved neurological prognosis and patient outcomes. Therefore, monitoring ETCO<sub>2</sub> levels should be considered a crucial component of evaluating resuscitation efficacy during CPR.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":32356,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology","volume":"75 3","pages":"Article 844588"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Anesthesiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0104001425000041","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Extracorporeal Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (ECPR) is an effective intervention for restoring adequate circulatory perfusion after cardiac arrest. Ensuring high-quality Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation (CPR) before initiating Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) is critical to mitigate tissue hypoxia and ischemia. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of End-Tidal Carbon Dioxide (ETCO2) Goal-Directed CPR (GDCPR) on neurological function before ECMO using a retrospective case-control analysis.

Methods

The medical records of all patients who received ECPR treated at Zhongshan City People's Hospital were collected between January 2020 and March 2023. In this retrospective cohort study, the patients were divided into Conventional CPR (CCPR) and ETCO2-GDCPR groups based on whether ETCO2 was used as a guide for CPR.

Results

A total of 71 patients were included, of whom 46 comprised the CCPR group and 25 comprised the GDCPR group. Approximately 37% of patients who received ECPR had good cerebral function at discharge, with a higher rate in the GDCPR group (52%) compared with the CCPR group (28%) (p = 0.047). Multivariate analysis showed that the Highest Interleukin-6 (H-IL6) levels after ECMO (Odds Ratio [OR = 1.001], 95% Confidence Interval [95% CI 1.000–1.003], p = 0.005) was a risk factor for neurological function at discharge. The other risk factors for poor prognosis in patients who received ECPR included pre-ECMO CPR protocols (OR = 10.74, 95% CI 1.90–60.48, p = 0.007) and IL6 levels after ECMO (OR = 1.002, 95% CI 1.001–1.003, p = 0.005). ECMO duration (OR = 0.83, 95% CI 0.74–0.94, p = 0.002) was identified as a protective factor. Patients with short ECMO duration have a poor prognosis. The area under the curve for ECMO duration was 0.86 (0.77–0.94, p < 0.01), while that for H-IL6 was 0.19 (0.09–0.29, p < 0.01).

Conclusion

ETCO2-guided ECPR is associated with improved neurological prognosis and patient outcomes. Therefore, monitoring ETCO2 levels should be considered a crucial component of evaluating resuscitation efficacy during CPR.
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
88
审稿时长
68 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信