Indobufen versus aspirin in patients with indication for antiplatelet therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis

IF 3.5 3区 医学 Q2 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Deivyd Vieira Silva Cavalcante , Mrinal Murali Krishna , Meghna Joseph , Ana Clara Felix de Farias Santos , Beatriz Ximenes Mendes , Nicole Asbeg , Wilton Francisco Gomes
{"title":"Indobufen versus aspirin in patients with indication for antiplatelet therapy: A systematic review and meta-analysis","authors":"Deivyd Vieira Silva Cavalcante ,&nbsp;Mrinal Murali Krishna ,&nbsp;Meghna Joseph ,&nbsp;Ana Clara Felix de Farias Santos ,&nbsp;Beatriz Ximenes Mendes ,&nbsp;Nicole Asbeg ,&nbsp;Wilton Francisco Gomes","doi":"10.1016/j.vph.2025.107465","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Aspirin is commonly recommended for individuals who have experienced stroke or myocardial infarction (MI). Indobufen, a cyclooxygenase-1 inhibitor, has been studied as a potential alternative. We conducted a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis (TSA) to compare indobufen with aspirin in patients requiring antiplatelet therapy.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>We searched PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Central for studies that compared indobufen and aspirin antiplatelet therapies. We focused on efficacy outcomes, such as composite vascular events, MI, and ischemic stroke, and safety outcomes, such as major bleeding and any bleeding. Heterogeneity was assessed using I2 statistics, and our analysis followed the PRISMA guidelines.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The review included 5 studies with 11,943 patients (indobufen <em>n</em> = 5952, 49.84 %), three involving post-MI and two involving post-stroke patients. No significant differences were found between the groups in composite vascular events at 90 days (RR 0.84; 95 % CI 0.46–1.53; <em>p</em> = 0.560; I2 = 53 %) and 1-year (RR 1.13; 95 % CI 0.99–1.29; <em>p</em> = 0.08; I2 = 0 %). MI (RR 0.73; 95 % CI 0.43–1.22; <em>p</em> = 0.22; I2 = 0 %), ischemic stroke (RR 1.16; 95 % CI 0.99–1.37; <em>p</em> = 0.06; I2 = 0 %), and cardiovascular death (RR 1.35; 95 % CI 0.80–2.26; <em>p</em> = 0.257; I2 = 0 %) at 1-year also showed no significant differences. Major bleeding at 1 year (RR 0.73; 95 % CI 0.41–1.31; <em>p</em> = 0.297; I2 = 64 %) was comparable, but any bleeding at 1 year showed a significant difference (RR 0.65; 95 % CI 0.43–0.98; <em>p</em> = 0.03; I2 = 87 %) favoring indobufen. Subgroup analysis of RCTs showed marginally significant increased risk regarding ischemic stroke with indobufen (RR 1.18; 95 % CI 1.00–1.39; <em>p</em> = 0.05).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>The efficacy and safety of antiplatelet therapy with indobufen were comparable to those of aspirin alone. Therefore, indobufen can be considered as a suitable alternative for patients who are intolerant or hypersensitive to aspirin. Nevertheless, additional trials involving larger populations are required to establish their clinical applicability.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23949,"journal":{"name":"Vascular pharmacology","volume":"158 ","pages":"Article 107465"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vascular pharmacology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1537189125000047","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Aspirin is commonly recommended for individuals who have experienced stroke or myocardial infarction (MI). Indobufen, a cyclooxygenase-1 inhibitor, has been studied as a potential alternative. We conducted a meta-analysis and trial sequential analysis (TSA) to compare indobufen with aspirin in patients requiring antiplatelet therapy.

Methods

We searched PubMed, Scopus, and Cochrane Central for studies that compared indobufen and aspirin antiplatelet therapies. We focused on efficacy outcomes, such as composite vascular events, MI, and ischemic stroke, and safety outcomes, such as major bleeding and any bleeding. Heterogeneity was assessed using I2 statistics, and our analysis followed the PRISMA guidelines.

Results

The review included 5 studies with 11,943 patients (indobufen n = 5952, 49.84 %), three involving post-MI and two involving post-stroke patients. No significant differences were found between the groups in composite vascular events at 90 days (RR 0.84; 95 % CI 0.46–1.53; p = 0.560; I2 = 53 %) and 1-year (RR 1.13; 95 % CI 0.99–1.29; p = 0.08; I2 = 0 %). MI (RR 0.73; 95 % CI 0.43–1.22; p = 0.22; I2 = 0 %), ischemic stroke (RR 1.16; 95 % CI 0.99–1.37; p = 0.06; I2 = 0 %), and cardiovascular death (RR 1.35; 95 % CI 0.80–2.26; p = 0.257; I2 = 0 %) at 1-year also showed no significant differences. Major bleeding at 1 year (RR 0.73; 95 % CI 0.41–1.31; p = 0.297; I2 = 64 %) was comparable, but any bleeding at 1 year showed a significant difference (RR 0.65; 95 % CI 0.43–0.98; p = 0.03; I2 = 87 %) favoring indobufen. Subgroup analysis of RCTs showed marginally significant increased risk regarding ischemic stroke with indobufen (RR 1.18; 95 % CI 1.00–1.39; p = 0.05).

Conclusion

The efficacy and safety of antiplatelet therapy with indobufen were comparable to those of aspirin alone. Therefore, indobufen can be considered as a suitable alternative for patients who are intolerant or hypersensitive to aspirin. Nevertheless, additional trials involving larger populations are required to establish their clinical applicability.

Abstract Image

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Vascular pharmacology
Vascular pharmacology 医学-药学
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
2.50%
发文量
153
审稿时长
31 days
期刊介绍: Vascular Pharmacology publishes papers, which contains results of all aspects of biology and pharmacology of the vascular system. Papers are encouraged in basic, translational and clinical aspects of Vascular Biology and Pharmacology, utilizing approaches ranging from molecular biology to integrative physiology. All papers are in English. The Journal publishes review articles which include vascular aspects of thrombosis, inflammation, cell signalling, atherosclerosis, and lipid metabolism.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信