Association between frailty and specific comorbidities on oncological outcomes in metastatic hormone-sensitive and castration resistant prostate cancer.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q3 ONCOLOGY
Mike Wenzel, Benedikt Hoeh, Carolin Siech, Clara Humke, Maria Welte, Marit Ahrens, Christoph Würnschimmel, Derya Tilki, Thomas Steuber, Markus Graefen, Luis Kluth, Felix K H Chun, Philipp Mandel
{"title":"Association between frailty and specific comorbidities on oncological outcomes in metastatic hormone-sensitive and castration resistant prostate cancer.","authors":"Mike Wenzel, Benedikt Hoeh, Carolin Siech, Clara Humke, Maria Welte, Marit Ahrens, Christoph Würnschimmel, Derya Tilki, Thomas Steuber, Markus Graefen, Luis Kluth, Felix K H Chun, Philipp Mandel","doi":"10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.01.001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Demographic changes will lead to higher proportions of metastatic hormone-sensitive (mHSPC) and castration resistant metastatic prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients with higher frailty index and multiple comorbidities.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>We relied on an institutional tertiary-care database to explore the effect of frailty (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group [ECOG]), as well as cardiovascular (CVD) and secondary malignancy (SecCa) comorbidities on overall survival (OS) and time to mCRPC in mHSPC and OS in mCRPC patients with Kaplan-Meyer estimates and Cox regression models.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 802 mHSPC patients, 61% were ECOG0 vs. 32% ECOG1 vs. 6.5% ECOG≥2. Significant differences in baseline patient and baseline mHSPC characteristics were observed for all three groups (all P ≤ 0.05). In time to mCRPC analyses and OS analyses of mHSPC and mCRPC patients, significant disadvantages were observed for ECOG 1/≥2 patients, relative to ECOG0, even after multivariable adjustment. Moreover, 31% of included patients had history/active CVD, which yielded significant median OS differences in mHSPC patients (95 vs. 63 months, multivariable hazard ratio: HR: 1.77, P < 0.01), but not in mCRPC patients (P = 0.085). After stratification according to SecCa, 14% had a SecCa which led to significant median OS differences in mCRPC patients (50 vs. 37 months, P < 0.01) but not in mHSPC patients (76 vs. 64 months, P = 0.089). Patients with higher frailty index and comorbidities showed significant differences in therapy lines.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Frailty and specific comorbidities significantly influence cancer-control outcomes in mHSPC, as well as mCRPC patients, even after controlling for adverse tumor characteristics.</p>","PeriodicalId":23408,"journal":{"name":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urologic Oncology-seminars and Original Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urolonc.2025.01.001","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Demographic changes will lead to higher proportions of metastatic hormone-sensitive (mHSPC) and castration resistant metastatic prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients with higher frailty index and multiple comorbidities.

Materials and methods: We relied on an institutional tertiary-care database to explore the effect of frailty (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group [ECOG]), as well as cardiovascular (CVD) and secondary malignancy (SecCa) comorbidities on overall survival (OS) and time to mCRPC in mHSPC and OS in mCRPC patients with Kaplan-Meyer estimates and Cox regression models.

Results: Of 802 mHSPC patients, 61% were ECOG0 vs. 32% ECOG1 vs. 6.5% ECOG≥2. Significant differences in baseline patient and baseline mHSPC characteristics were observed for all three groups (all P ≤ 0.05). In time to mCRPC analyses and OS analyses of mHSPC and mCRPC patients, significant disadvantages were observed for ECOG 1/≥2 patients, relative to ECOG0, even after multivariable adjustment. Moreover, 31% of included patients had history/active CVD, which yielded significant median OS differences in mHSPC patients (95 vs. 63 months, multivariable hazard ratio: HR: 1.77, P < 0.01), but not in mCRPC patients (P = 0.085). After stratification according to SecCa, 14% had a SecCa which led to significant median OS differences in mCRPC patients (50 vs. 37 months, P < 0.01) but not in mHSPC patients (76 vs. 64 months, P = 0.089). Patients with higher frailty index and comorbidities showed significant differences in therapy lines.

Conclusion: Frailty and specific comorbidities significantly influence cancer-control outcomes in mHSPC, as well as mCRPC patients, even after controlling for adverse tumor characteristics.

目的:人口结构的变化将导致对激素敏感的转移性前列腺癌(mHSPC)和对阉割有抵抗力的转移性前列腺癌(mCRPC)患者中体弱指数较高和患有多种合并症的比例增加:我们依托一家三级医疗机构的数据库,利用Kaplan-Meyer估计值和Cox回归模型探讨了虚弱(东部合作肿瘤学组[ECOG])、心血管疾病(CVD)和继发性恶性肿瘤(SecCa)合并症对mHSPC患者总生存期(OS)和mCRPC时间以及mCRPC患者OS的影响:在802例mHSPC患者中,61%为ECOG0,32%为ECOG1,6.5%为ECOG≥2。所有三组患者的基线和基线mHSPC特征均存在显著差异(P均≤0.05)。在mCRPC时间分析和mHSPC与mCRPC患者的OS分析中,即使经过多变量调整,也观察到ECOG 1/≥2患者相对于ECOG0患者有明显的劣势。此外,31%的纳入患者有心血管疾病史/活动性心血管疾病,这导致mHSPC患者的中位OS差异显著(95个月对63个月,多变量危险比:HR:1.77,P <0.01),但mCRPC患者的中位OS差异不显著(P = 0.085)。根据SecCa进行分层后,14%的患者患有SecCa,这导致mCRPC患者的中位OS差异显著(50个月对37个月,P < 0.01),但mHSPC患者的中位OS差异不显著(76个月对64个月,P = 0.089)。体弱指数和合并症较高的患者在治疗方案上存在显著差异:结论:即使控制了不良肿瘤特征,虚弱和特定的合并症也会对mHSPC和mCRPC患者的癌症控制结果产生重大影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.70%
发文量
297
审稿时长
7.6 weeks
期刊介绍: Urologic Oncology: Seminars and Original Investigations is the official journal of the Society of Urologic Oncology. The journal publishes practical, timely, and relevant clinical and basic science research articles which address any aspect of urologic oncology. Each issue comprises original research, news and topics, survey articles providing short commentaries on other important articles in the urologic oncology literature, and reviews including an in-depth Seminar examining a specific clinical dilemma. The journal periodically publishes supplement issues devoted to areas of current interest to the urologic oncology community. Articles published are of interest to researchers and the clinicians involved in the practice of urologic oncology including urologists, oncologists, and radiologists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信