Marco Di Nitto , Silvia Ucciero , Tatiana Bolgeo , Vincenzo Damico , Greta Ghizzardi , Sipontina Rita Zerulo , Mario Roselli , Rosaria Alvaro , Francesco Torino , Ercole Vellone
{"title":"Psychometric Properties of the Self Care Oral Anticancer Agents Index (SCOAAI)","authors":"Marco Di Nitto , Silvia Ucciero , Tatiana Bolgeo , Vincenzo Damico , Greta Ghizzardi , Sipontina Rita Zerulo , Mario Roselli , Rosaria Alvaro , Francesco Torino , Ercole Vellone","doi":"10.1016/j.soncn.2025.151810","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><div>To test the Self-Care Oral Anticancer Agents Index (SCOAAI)’s psychometric properties (structural validity, convergent validity, predictive validity, and internal consistency) in a sample of patients with solid tumour on Oral anticancer agents (OAA).</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A methodological research in five in- or out-patient Italian facilities. Structural validity was tested by confirmatory factor analysis, and internal consistency was assessed through Cronbach's alpha and composite reliability. The Mann–Whitney U-test was used to test associations between SCOAAI scores and patient's emergency room admission, re-hospitalization, mortality, and quality of life measured three months after baseline.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>We enrolled 356 patients; mostly were male (52.24%), and mean age was 59.10 years. Analyses demonstrated the SCOAAI's factorial validity and internal consistency. Moreover, patients that experienced emergency room admissions (U = 3484.5; <em>P</em> = .002) and re-hospitalization (U = 2446.0; <em>P</em> = .001) showed lower self-care maintenance scores; those who experienced emergency room admission (U = 3263.5; <em>P</em> = .019) and died at follow-up (U = 700.5; <em>P</em> = .025) had lower self-care monitoring scores; while patients that experienced re-hospitalisation (U = 2931.5; <em>P</em> = .040) and emergency room admission (U = 3285.0; <em>P</em> = .012) had lower self-care management scores. Patients with adequate self-care (≥ 70) reported significantly higher quality of life (self-care maintenance U = 1228.500, <em>P</em> < .001; self-care monitoring U = 3512.500, <em>P</em> < .001; self-care management U = 3287.500, <em>P</em> < .001).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>According to our findings the SCOAAI is a valid and reliable tool. Patients with inadequate self-care can experience more emergency room accesses, re-hospitalization, death, and lower quality of life.</div></div><div><h3>Implications for Nursing Practice</h3><div>Adequate self-care behaviors can improve patient's outcomes and should be assessed by healthcare providers during the disease pathway.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54253,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in Oncology Nursing","volume":"41 2","pages":"Article 151810"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in Oncology Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0749208125000038","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective
To test the Self-Care Oral Anticancer Agents Index (SCOAAI)’s psychometric properties (structural validity, convergent validity, predictive validity, and internal consistency) in a sample of patients with solid tumour on Oral anticancer agents (OAA).
Methods
A methodological research in five in- or out-patient Italian facilities. Structural validity was tested by confirmatory factor analysis, and internal consistency was assessed through Cronbach's alpha and composite reliability. The Mann–Whitney U-test was used to test associations between SCOAAI scores and patient's emergency room admission, re-hospitalization, mortality, and quality of life measured three months after baseline.
Results
We enrolled 356 patients; mostly were male (52.24%), and mean age was 59.10 years. Analyses demonstrated the SCOAAI's factorial validity and internal consistency. Moreover, patients that experienced emergency room admissions (U = 3484.5; P = .002) and re-hospitalization (U = 2446.0; P = .001) showed lower self-care maintenance scores; those who experienced emergency room admission (U = 3263.5; P = .019) and died at follow-up (U = 700.5; P = .025) had lower self-care monitoring scores; while patients that experienced re-hospitalisation (U = 2931.5; P = .040) and emergency room admission (U = 3285.0; P = .012) had lower self-care management scores. Patients with adequate self-care (≥ 70) reported significantly higher quality of life (self-care maintenance U = 1228.500, P < .001; self-care monitoring U = 3512.500, P < .001; self-care management U = 3287.500, P < .001).
Conclusion
According to our findings the SCOAAI is a valid and reliable tool. Patients with inadequate self-care can experience more emergency room accesses, re-hospitalization, death, and lower quality of life.
Implications for Nursing Practice
Adequate self-care behaviors can improve patient's outcomes and should be assessed by healthcare providers during the disease pathway.
期刊介绍:
Seminars in Oncology Nursing is a unique international journal published six times a year. Each issue offers a multi-faceted overview of a single cancer topic from a selection of expert review articles and disseminates oncology nursing research relevant to patient care, nursing education, management, and policy development.