Efficacy of a group-based 8-week multicomponent cognitive training on cognition, mood and activities of daily living among healthy older adults: A two-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.

IF 4.3 Q2 BUSINESS
Patsri Srisuwan, Daochompu Nakawiro, Orawan Kuha, Supatcha Kengpanich, Kulachade Gesakomol, Sirinthorn Chansirikarnjana
{"title":"Efficacy of a group-based 8-week multicomponent cognitive training on cognition, mood and activities of daily living among healthy older adults: A two-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial.","authors":"Patsri Srisuwan, Daochompu Nakawiro, Orawan Kuha, Supatcha Kengpanich, Kulachade Gesakomol, Sirinthorn Chansirikarnjana","doi":"10.1016/j.tjpad.2024.100033","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cognitive training (CT) has been one of the important non-pharmaceutical interventions that could delay cognitive decline. Currently, no definite CT methods are available. Furthermore, little attention has been paid to the effect of CT on mood and instrumental activities of daily living (IADL).</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the effectiveness of a multicomponent CT using a training program of executive functions, attention, memory and visuospatial functions (TEAM-V Program) on cognition, mood and instrumental ADL.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>A randomized, single-blinded, treatment-as-usual controlled trial.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Geriatric clinic in Bangkok, Thailand.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>80 nondemented community-dwelling older adults (mean age 65.7 ± 4.3 years).</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>The CT (TEAM-V) Program or the treatment-as-usual controlled group. The TEAM-V intervention was conducted over 5 sessions, with a 2-week interval between each session. A total of 80 participants were randomized (n = 40 the TEAM-V Program; n = 40 the control group).</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>The Thai version of Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), The Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-cog), Thai version of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and The Chula ADL were used to assess at baseline, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Compared with the control arm (n = 36), the TEAM-V Program (n = 39) was associated with significantly improved general cognition (MoCA, P = 0.02) at 2 years. Compared with baseline, participants receiving the TEAM-V Program were associated with significantly improved immediate recall (word recall task, P < 0.001), retrieval and retention of memory processes (word recognition task, P = 0.01) and attention (number cancellation part A, P = 0.01) at 2 years. No training effects on anxiety (P = 0.94), depression (P = 0.093) and IADL (P = 0.48) were detected.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The TEAM-V Program was effective in improving global cognitive function. Even though, the program did not significantly improve anxiety, depression and IADL compared with the control group, memory and attention improved in the intervention group compared with baseline. Further studies incorporating a larger sample size, longitudinal follow-up and higher-intensity CT should be conducted.</p>","PeriodicalId":22711,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease","volume":"12 2","pages":"100033"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjpad.2024.100033","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cognitive training (CT) has been one of the important non-pharmaceutical interventions that could delay cognitive decline. Currently, no definite CT methods are available. Furthermore, little attention has been paid to the effect of CT on mood and instrumental activities of daily living (IADL).

Objectives: To assess the effectiveness of a multicomponent CT using a training program of executive functions, attention, memory and visuospatial functions (TEAM-V Program) on cognition, mood and instrumental ADL.

Design: A randomized, single-blinded, treatment-as-usual controlled trial.

Setting: Geriatric clinic in Bangkok, Thailand.

Participants: 80 nondemented community-dwelling older adults (mean age 65.7 ± 4.3 years).

Intervention: The CT (TEAM-V) Program or the treatment-as-usual controlled group. The TEAM-V intervention was conducted over 5 sessions, with a 2-week interval between each session. A total of 80 participants were randomized (n = 40 the TEAM-V Program; n = 40 the control group).

Measurements: The Thai version of Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA), The Alzheimer's Disease Assessment Scale-Cognitive Subscale (ADAS-cog), Thai version of Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) and The Chula ADL were used to assess at baseline, 6 months, 1 year and 2 years.

Results: Compared with the control arm (n = 36), the TEAM-V Program (n = 39) was associated with significantly improved general cognition (MoCA, P = 0.02) at 2 years. Compared with baseline, participants receiving the TEAM-V Program were associated with significantly improved immediate recall (word recall task, P < 0.001), retrieval and retention of memory processes (word recognition task, P = 0.01) and attention (number cancellation part A, P = 0.01) at 2 years. No training effects on anxiety (P = 0.94), depression (P = 0.093) and IADL (P = 0.48) were detected.

Conclusions: The TEAM-V Program was effective in improving global cognitive function. Even though, the program did not significantly improve anxiety, depression and IADL compared with the control group, memory and attention improved in the intervention group compared with baseline. Further studies incorporating a larger sample size, longitudinal follow-up and higher-intensity CT should be conducted.

以小组为基础的8周多成分认知训练对健康老年人认知、情绪和日常生活活动的影响:一项为期两年的随机对照试验随访
背景:认知训练(CT)已成为延缓认知衰退的重要非药物干预措施之一。目前尚无明确的CT方法。此外,CT对情绪和日常生活工具活动(IADL)的影响很少受到关注。目的:评价采用执行功能、注意、记忆和视觉空间功能训练方案(TEAM-V方案)的多分量CT对认知、情绪和工具性ADL的效果。设计:随机、单盲、常规治疗对照试验。地点:泰国曼谷的老年诊所。参与者:80名居住在社区的无痴呆老年人(平均年龄65.7±4.3岁)。干预:CT (TEAM-V)项目或常规治疗对照组。TEAM-V干预分5期进行,每期间隔2周。共有80名参与者被随机分配(n = 40), TEAM-V计划;N = 40(对照组)。测量方法:采用泰版蒙特利尔认知评估(MoCA)、阿尔茨海默病评估量表-认知亚量表(ADAS-cog)、泰版医院焦虑和抑郁量表(HADS)和Chula ADL进行基线、6个月、1年和2年的评估。结果:与对照组(n = 36)相比,TEAM-V计划组(n = 39)在2年时的一般认知能力显著改善(MoCA, P = 0.02)。与基线相比,TEAM-V方案的参与者在2年时的即时回忆(单词回忆任务,P < 0.001)、记忆过程的检索和保留(单词识别任务,P = 0.01)和注意力(数字取消部分A, P = 0.01)均有显著改善。训练对焦虑(P = 0.94)、抑郁(P = 0.093)和IADL (P = 0.48)均无影响。结论:TEAM-V方案能有效改善整体认知功能。尽管与对照组相比,该计划没有显著改善焦虑、抑郁和IADL,但与基线相比,干预组的记忆和注意力有所改善。进一步的研究应纳入更大的样本量,纵向随访和高强度CT。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease
The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The JPAD Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer’Disease will publish reviews, original research articles and short reports to improve our knowledge in the field of Alzheimer prevention including: neurosciences, biomarkers, imaging, epidemiology, public health, physical cognitive exercise, nutrition, risk and protective factors, drug development, trials design, and heath economic outcomes.JPAD will publish also the meeting abstracts from Clinical Trial on Alzheimer Disease (CTAD) and will be distributed both in paper and online version worldwide.We hope that JPAD with your contribution will play a role in the development of Alzheimer prevention.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信