Determinants of dementia diagnosis in U.S. primary care in the past decade: A scoping review.

IF 4.3 Q2 BUSINESS
Chelsea G Cox, Barbara L Brush, Lindsay C Kobayashi, J Scott Roberts
{"title":"Determinants of dementia diagnosis in U.S. primary care in the past decade: A scoping review.","authors":"Chelsea G Cox, Barbara L Brush, Lindsay C Kobayashi, J Scott Roberts","doi":"10.1016/j.tjpad.2024.100035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) are chronically underdiagnosed in the U.S., particularly among minoritized racial and ethnic groups. Primary care providers are at the forefront of diagnosis given the increasing prevalence of cases and shortage of dementia specialists. Advances in policy, detection, and treatment in the past decade necessitate an updated review of the current state of determinants of ADRD diagnosis in U.S. primary care settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines, we conducted a scoping literature review on ADRD diagnosis among older adults in U.S. primary care settings. Studies published in English from January 2010 to January 2024 were retrieved from PubMed, PsycINFO, and CINAHL. We extracted primary data on study characteristics and synthesized key findings according to facilitators, barriers, and rates of diagnosis in primary care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of 563 articles retrieved, 12 met eligibility criteria. Three studies reported rates of diagnosis, and all but one reported facilitators and/or barriers to diagnosis. ADRD remains underdiagnosed in primary care settings, especially in the earliest symptomatic stage (i.e., mild cognitive impairment). Multi-level barriers and facilitators were identified including individual beliefs about ADRD (e.g., value of early diagnosis), interpersonal relationships between patients and their family members and providers (e.g., importance of an established clinical relationship), and healthcare system limitations (e.g., insufficient resources and training).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite national policy efforts to improve timely diagnosis of ADRD, underdiagnosis remains a clinical and public health challenge. Increased attention to social and community contexts will be important for future research and intervention.</p>","PeriodicalId":22711,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease","volume":"12 2","pages":"100035"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tjpad.2024.100035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Alzheimer's disease and related dementias (ADRD) are chronically underdiagnosed in the U.S., particularly among minoritized racial and ethnic groups. Primary care providers are at the forefront of diagnosis given the increasing prevalence of cases and shortage of dementia specialists. Advances in policy, detection, and treatment in the past decade necessitate an updated review of the current state of determinants of ADRD diagnosis in U.S. primary care settings.

Methods: Following Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines, we conducted a scoping literature review on ADRD diagnosis among older adults in U.S. primary care settings. Studies published in English from January 2010 to January 2024 were retrieved from PubMed, PsycINFO, and CINAHL. We extracted primary data on study characteristics and synthesized key findings according to facilitators, barriers, and rates of diagnosis in primary care.

Results: Of 563 articles retrieved, 12 met eligibility criteria. Three studies reported rates of diagnosis, and all but one reported facilitators and/or barriers to diagnosis. ADRD remains underdiagnosed in primary care settings, especially in the earliest symptomatic stage (i.e., mild cognitive impairment). Multi-level barriers and facilitators were identified including individual beliefs about ADRD (e.g., value of early diagnosis), interpersonal relationships between patients and their family members and providers (e.g., importance of an established clinical relationship), and healthcare system limitations (e.g., insufficient resources and training).

Conclusion: Despite national policy efforts to improve timely diagnosis of ADRD, underdiagnosis remains a clinical and public health challenge. Increased attention to social and community contexts will be important for future research and intervention.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease
The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease Medicine-Psychiatry and Mental Health
CiteScore
9.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The JPAD Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer’Disease will publish reviews, original research articles and short reports to improve our knowledge in the field of Alzheimer prevention including: neurosciences, biomarkers, imaging, epidemiology, public health, physical cognitive exercise, nutrition, risk and protective factors, drug development, trials design, and heath economic outcomes.JPAD will publish also the meeting abstracts from Clinical Trial on Alzheimer Disease (CTAD) and will be distributed both in paper and online version worldwide.We hope that JPAD with your contribution will play a role in the development of Alzheimer prevention.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信