The feasibility of assessing prognosis over 3 years in persons with a previous stroke/transient ischemic attack in general practice.

IF 1.6 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Eimear Ryan, Harmeet Gill, Róisín Doogue, David McCann, Andrew W Murphy, Peter Hayes
{"title":"The feasibility of assessing prognosis over 3 years in persons with a previous stroke/transient ischemic attack in general practice.","authors":"Eimear Ryan, Harmeet Gill, Róisín Doogue, David McCann, Andrew W Murphy, Peter Hayes","doi":"10.1186/s40814-025-01595-8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Stroke has devastating consequences for survivors. Hypertension is the most important modifiable risk factor, and its management largely takes place in primary care. However, most stroke-based research does not occur in this setting. Ongoing hypertension and a risk of further stroke are a major concern for both patients and their general practitioners. We aim to assess whether it is feasible to assess prognosis in persons, with a previous stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA), in general practice, and whether a well-powered observational study is possible.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We performed a search of the electronic health record of individuals previously identified as having had a stroke or TIA, to assess prognosis over 3 years. Feasibility was assessed by meeting five criteria: (1) all general practices approached participated, (2) greater than 90% of patient records were accessible, (3) all study outcomes were available to review, (4) that collection data was less than 15 min per patient, and (5) a power calculation for a planned observational study could take place.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>All six general practices approached participated freely, and 193/196 patients' files were reidentified (98.5%). Twenty-eight cardiovascular events were recorded-most commonly a repeat TIA or ischemic stroke. Data collection took on average 5.5 min per file, and a power calculation for a planned observational study was completed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This study demonstrates that the proposed methodology for a full cohort study within general practice of patients post-stroke/TIA is both acceptable to practices and feasible. An adequately powered, \"time-to-event\" study is possible.</p>","PeriodicalId":20176,"journal":{"name":"Pilot and Feasibility Studies","volume":"11 1","pages":"9"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11762887/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pilot and Feasibility Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s40814-025-01595-8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Stroke has devastating consequences for survivors. Hypertension is the most important modifiable risk factor, and its management largely takes place in primary care. However, most stroke-based research does not occur in this setting. Ongoing hypertension and a risk of further stroke are a major concern for both patients and their general practitioners. We aim to assess whether it is feasible to assess prognosis in persons, with a previous stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA), in general practice, and whether a well-powered observational study is possible.

Methods: We performed a search of the electronic health record of individuals previously identified as having had a stroke or TIA, to assess prognosis over 3 years. Feasibility was assessed by meeting five criteria: (1) all general practices approached participated, (2) greater than 90% of patient records were accessible, (3) all study outcomes were available to review, (4) that collection data was less than 15 min per patient, and (5) a power calculation for a planned observational study could take place.

Results: All six general practices approached participated freely, and 193/196 patients' files were reidentified (98.5%). Twenty-eight cardiovascular events were recorded-most commonly a repeat TIA or ischemic stroke. Data collection took on average 5.5 min per file, and a power calculation for a planned observational study was completed.

Conclusion: This study demonstrates that the proposed methodology for a full cohort study within general practice of patients post-stroke/TIA is both acceptable to practices and feasible. An adequately powered, "time-to-event" study is possible.

评估既往卒中/短暂性脑缺血发作患者3年以上预后的可行性
背景:中风对幸存者具有毁灭性的后果。高血压是最重要的可改变的危险因素,其管理主要发生在初级保健。然而,大多数基于中风的研究并不是在这种情况下进行的。持续的高血压和进一步中风的风险是患者和他们的全科医生的主要关注点。我们的目的是评估在一般实践中评估既往卒中或短暂性脑缺血发作(TIA)患者的预后是否可行,以及是否有可能进行一项强有力的观察性研究。方法:我们搜索了先前确定有过中风或TIA的个人的电子健康记录,以评估3年以上的预后。可行性通过满足五个标准来评估:(1)所有接近的全科医生参与,(2)超过90%的患者记录可访问,(3)所有研究结果可用于审查,(4)每个患者收集的数据少于15分钟,(5)可以进行计划观察性研究的功率计算。结果:6名全科医生均自由参与,193/196例患者档案被重新识别(98.5%)。28例心血管事件被记录下来,最常见的是重复的TIA或缺血性中风。每个文件的数据收集平均耗时5.5分钟,并完成了计划观察性研究的功率计算。结论:本研究表明,在卒中/TIA后患者的一般实践中,提出的全队列研究方法是可接受的,也是可行的。一个足够有力的“事件时间”研究是可能的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
Pilot and Feasibility Studies Medicine-Medicine (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
5.90%
发文量
241
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊介绍: Pilot and Feasibility Studies encompasses all aspects of the design, conduct and reporting of pilot and feasibility studies in biomedicine. The journal publishes research articles that are intended to directly influence future clinical trials or large scale observational studies, as well as protocols, commentaries and methodology articles. The journal also ensures that the results of all well-conducted, peer-reviewed, pilot and feasibility studies are published, regardless of outcome or significance of findings. Pilot and feasibility studies are increasingly conducted prior to a full randomized controlled trial. However, these studies often lack clear objectives, many remain unpublished, and there is confusion over the meanings of the words “pilot” and “feasibility”. Pilot and Feasibility Studies provides a forum for discussion around this key aspect of the scientific process, and seeks to ensure that these studies are published, so as to complete the publication thread for clinical research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信