One-week test-retest stability of heart rate variability during rest and deep breathing.

IF 2.3 4区 医学 Q3 BIOPHYSICS
Andy Schumann, Franziska Lukas, Katrin Rieger, Yubraj Gupta, Karl-Jürgen Bär
{"title":"One-week test-retest stability of heart rate variability during rest and deep breathing.","authors":"Andy Schumann, Franziska Lukas, Katrin Rieger, Yubraj Gupta, Karl-Jürgen Bär","doi":"10.1088/1361-6579/adae51","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Objective</i>. Heart rate variability (HRV) is an important indicator of cardiac autonomic function. Given its clinical significance, reliable HRV assessment is crucial. Here, we assessed test-retest stability, as a key aspect of reliability, quantifying the consistency of a measure when repeated under the same conditions.<i>Approach</i>. This observational study includes healthy individuals. A 20 min electrocardiogram was recorded at rest in a supine position and during deep breathing in two lab sessions within one week, at the same time of day. HRV indices from time domain, frequency domain, nonlinear dynamics, and information-theoretic complexity were assessed using a validated toolbox. Additionally, heart rate variations per respiratory cycle were evaluated during deep breathing. Lifestyle factors such as perceived stress, mood, physical activity, sleep quality were assessed prior to both sessions. Intra-class correlation (ICC) and coefficients of variation (CVs) were used to assess the concordance between the two measurements and the relative deviation, respectively.<i>Main results</i>. From 62 screened individuals, 51 participants were recruited from the local community. One participant opted out for personal reasons, and another with frequent premature beats was excluded, leaving a final sample of 49 individuals. Most self-rated psychological and lifestyle indicators showed substantial agreement, though participants reported less stress and better mood in the second session. At rest, ICC of HRV ranged from 0.50 to 0.83, with CV from 5% to 41%. Spectral HRV measures were less reliable than time domain parameters. Nonlinear and time domain features had substantial to nearly perfect agreement. Complexity measures had low CVs but limited test-retest correlation. The stability indices of HRV during deep breathing were not significantly different from those during rest. Test-retest differences in root mean square of the successive beat-to-beat interval difference were not sufficiently explained by lifestyle factors.<i>Significance.</i>Test-retest stability of HRV depends considerably on chosen measures. Our data suggest that HRV can be assessed reliably using time-domain indices at rest.</p>","PeriodicalId":20047,"journal":{"name":"Physiological measurement","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physiological measurement","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6579/adae51","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BIOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective. Heart rate variability (HRV) is an important indicator of cardiac autonomic function. Given its clinical significance, reliable HRV assessment is crucial. Here, we assessed test-retest stability, as a key aspect of reliability, quantifying the consistency of a measure when repeated under the same conditions.Approach. This observational study includes healthy individuals. A 20 min electrocardiogram was recorded at rest in a supine position and during deep breathing in two lab sessions within one week, at the same time of day. HRV indices from time domain, frequency domain, nonlinear dynamics, and information-theoretic complexity were assessed using a validated toolbox. Additionally, heart rate variations per respiratory cycle were evaluated during deep breathing. Lifestyle factors such as perceived stress, mood, physical activity, sleep quality were assessed prior to both sessions. Intra-class correlation (ICC) and coefficients of variation (CVs) were used to assess the concordance between the two measurements and the relative deviation, respectively.Main results. From 62 screened individuals, 51 participants were recruited from the local community. One participant opted out for personal reasons, and another with frequent premature beats was excluded, leaving a final sample of 49 individuals. Most self-rated psychological and lifestyle indicators showed substantial agreement, though participants reported less stress and better mood in the second session. At rest, ICC of HRV ranged from 0.50 to 0.83, with CV from 5% to 41%. Spectral HRV measures were less reliable than time domain parameters. Nonlinear and time domain features had substantial to nearly perfect agreement. Complexity measures had low CVs but limited test-retest correlation. The stability indices of HRV during deep breathing were not significantly different from those during rest. Test-retest differences in root mean square of the successive beat-to-beat interval difference were not sufficiently explained by lifestyle factors.Significance.Test-retest stability of HRV depends considerably on chosen measures. Our data suggest that HRV can be assessed reliably using time-domain indices at rest.

一周测试-再次测试休息和深呼吸时心率变异性的稳定性。
心率变异性(HRV)是衡量心脏自主神经功能的重要指标。鉴于其临床意义,可靠的HRV评估至关重要。在这里,我们评估了测试-重测试稳定性,作为可靠性的一个关键方面,量化了在相同条件下重复测量时的一致性。这项观察性研究包括健康个体。在一周内的同一时间,分别记录两组受试者在仰卧休息和深呼吸时20分钟的心电图。从时域、频域、非线性动力学和信息论复杂性等方面对HRV指标进行了评估。此外,在深呼吸期间评估每个呼吸周期的心率变化。生活方式因素,如感知压力、情绪、身体活动、睡眠质量,在两次会议之前都进行了评估。使用类内相关(ICC)和变异系数(CV)分别评估两个测量值之间的一致性和相对偏差。 ;从62个筛选个体中,从当地社区招募了51名参与者。一名参与者因个人原因选择退出,另一名经常早搏的人被排除在外,最终样本为49人。大多数自我评估的心理和生活方式指标显示出了实质性的一致,尽管参与者在第二阶段报告压力减轻,情绪好转。休息时,HRV的ICC范围为0.50 ~ 0.83,CV范围为5% ~ 41%。频谱HRV测量不如时域参数可靠。非线性特征和时域特征几乎完全一致。复杂性度量具有较低的cv,但有限的测试-重测试相关性。深呼吸时HRV稳定性指标与休息时无显著差异。RMSSD的重测差异不能用生活方式因素充分解释。HRV的复测稳定性在很大程度上取决于所选择的测量方法。我们的数据表明,静止时使用时域指标可以可靠地评估HRV。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Physiological measurement
Physiological measurement 生物-工程:生物医学
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
9.40%
发文量
124
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Physiological Measurement publishes papers about the quantitative assessment and visualization of physiological function in clinical research and practice, with an emphasis on the development of new methods of measurement and their validation. Papers are published on topics including: applied physiology in illness and health electrical bioimpedance, optical and acoustic measurement techniques advanced methods of time series and other data analysis biomedical and clinical engineering in-patient and ambulatory monitoring point-of-care technologies novel clinical measurements of cardiovascular, neurological, and musculoskeletal systems. measurements in molecular, cellular and organ physiology and electrophysiology physiological modeling and simulation novel biomedical sensors, instruments, devices and systems measurement standards and guidelines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信