Respiratory impact of local anaesthetic volume after an interscalene brachial plexus block with an extrafascial injection: a randomised controlled double-blinded trial.

IF 9.1 1区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Yves Renard, Sina Grape, Erin Gonvers, Jean-Benoit Rossel, Patrick Goetti, Eric Albrecht
{"title":"Respiratory impact of local anaesthetic volume after an interscalene brachial plexus block with an extrafascial injection: a randomised controlled double-blinded trial.","authors":"Yves Renard, Sina Grape, Erin Gonvers, Jean-Benoit Rossel, Patrick Goetti, Eric Albrecht","doi":"10.1016/j.bja.2024.12.010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>We have previously demonstrated that an extrafascial injection of 20 ml of local anaesthetic for interscalene brachial plexus block (ISB) reduces the rate of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis by 70% compared with an intrafascial injection, with similar efficacy. In this double-blind trial, we tested the hypothesis that a local anaesthetic volume of 10 ml injected extrafascially would reduce the rate of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis vs a volume of 20 ml, while providing similar analgesia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Sixty ASA physical status 1-3 patients scheduled for elective shoulder surgery under general anaesthesia were randomised to receive ultrasound-guided extrafascial ISB using ropivacaine 0.75% 20 ml (control group) or 10 ml (low-volume group) injected lateral to the brachial plexus sheath. The primary outcome was incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis (diaphragmatic excursion reduction of >75%), measured by M-mode ultrasonography, at 30 min after the procedure. Secondary outcomes included duration of analgesia and i.v. morphine consumption at 24 h after surgery.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 30-min hemidiaphragmatic paralysis rate was 80% (95% confidence interval [CI] 61-91%) in the control group and 19% (95% CI 8-40%) in the low-volume group (P<0.001). Participants in the low-volume vs control group had a shorter duration of analgesia (550 vs 873 min; P<0.01) and higher i.v. morphine consumption (20 vs 12 mg; P=0.03).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A low volume of local anaesthetic injected extrafascially reduced the rate of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis, but at the expense of a shorter duration of analgesia compared with standard-dose extrafascial anaesthetic injection.</p><p><strong>Clinical trial registration: </strong>NCT04726280.</p>","PeriodicalId":9250,"journal":{"name":"British journal of anaesthesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":9.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British journal of anaesthesia","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bja.2024.12.010","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: We have previously demonstrated that an extrafascial injection of 20 ml of local anaesthetic for interscalene brachial plexus block (ISB) reduces the rate of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis by 70% compared with an intrafascial injection, with similar efficacy. In this double-blind trial, we tested the hypothesis that a local anaesthetic volume of 10 ml injected extrafascially would reduce the rate of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis vs a volume of 20 ml, while providing similar analgesia.

Methods: Sixty ASA physical status 1-3 patients scheduled for elective shoulder surgery under general anaesthesia were randomised to receive ultrasound-guided extrafascial ISB using ropivacaine 0.75% 20 ml (control group) or 10 ml (low-volume group) injected lateral to the brachial plexus sheath. The primary outcome was incidence of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis (diaphragmatic excursion reduction of >75%), measured by M-mode ultrasonography, at 30 min after the procedure. Secondary outcomes included duration of analgesia and i.v. morphine consumption at 24 h after surgery.

Results: The 30-min hemidiaphragmatic paralysis rate was 80% (95% confidence interval [CI] 61-91%) in the control group and 19% (95% CI 8-40%) in the low-volume group (P<0.001). Participants in the low-volume vs control group had a shorter duration of analgesia (550 vs 873 min; P<0.01) and higher i.v. morphine consumption (20 vs 12 mg; P=0.03).

Conclusions: A low volume of local anaesthetic injected extrafascially reduced the rate of hemidiaphragmatic paralysis, but at the expense of a shorter duration of analgesia compared with standard-dose extrafascial anaesthetic injection.

Clinical trial registration: NCT04726280.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
13.50
自引率
7.10%
发文量
488
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Anaesthesia (BJA) is a prestigious publication that covers a wide range of topics in anaesthesia, critical care medicine, pain medicine, and perioperative medicine. It aims to disseminate high-impact original research, spanning fundamental, translational, and clinical sciences, as well as clinical practice, technology, education, and training. Additionally, the journal features review articles, notable case reports, correspondence, and special articles that appeal to a broader audience. The BJA is proudly associated with The Royal College of Anaesthetists, The College of Anaesthesiologists of Ireland, and The Hong Kong College of Anaesthesiologists. This partnership provides members of these esteemed institutions with access to not only the BJA but also its sister publication, BJA Education. It is essential to note that both journals maintain their editorial independence. Overall, the BJA offers a diverse and comprehensive platform for anaesthetists, critical care physicians, pain specialists, and perioperative medicine practitioners to contribute and stay updated with the latest advancements in their respective fields.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信