Generalisation of EEG-Based Pain Biomarker Classification for Predicting Central Neuropathic Pain in Subacute Spinal Cord Injury.

IF 3.9 3区 工程技术 Q2 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY
Keri Anderson, Sebastian Stein, Ho Suen, Mariel Purcell, Maurizio Belci, Euan McCaughey, Ronali McLean, Aye Khine, Aleksandra Vuckovic
{"title":"Generalisation of EEG-Based Pain Biomarker Classification for Predicting Central Neuropathic Pain in Subacute Spinal Cord Injury.","authors":"Keri Anderson, Sebastian Stein, Ho Suen, Mariel Purcell, Maurizio Belci, Euan McCaughey, Ronali McLean, Aye Khine, Aleksandra Vuckovic","doi":"10.3390/biomedicines13010213","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> The objective was to test the generalisability of electroencephalography (EEG) markers of future pain using two independent datasets. <b>Methods:</b> Datasets, A [N = 20] and B [N = 35], were collected from participants with subacute spinal cord injury who did not have neuropathic pain at the time of recording. In both datasets, some participants developed pain within six months, (PDP) will others did not (PNP). EEG features were extracted based on either band power or Higuchi fractal dimension (HFD). Three levels of generalisability were tested: (1) classification PDP vs. PNP in datasets A and B separately; (2) classification between groups in datasets A and B together; and (3) classification where one dataset (A or B) was used for training and testing, and the other for validation. A novel normalisation method was applied to HFD features. <b>Results:</b> Training and testing of individual datasets achieved classification accuracies of >80% using either feature set, and classification of joint datasets (A and B) achieved a maximum accuracy of 86.4% (HFD, support vector machine (SVM)). With normalisation and feature reduction (principal components), the validation accuracy was 66.6%. <b>Conclusions:</b> An SVM classifier with HFD features showed the best robustness, and normalisation improved the accuracy of predicting future neuropathic pain well above the chance level.</p>","PeriodicalId":8937,"journal":{"name":"Biomedicines","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11759196/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedicines","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/biomedicines13010213","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The objective was to test the generalisability of electroencephalography (EEG) markers of future pain using two independent datasets. Methods: Datasets, A [N = 20] and B [N = 35], were collected from participants with subacute spinal cord injury who did not have neuropathic pain at the time of recording. In both datasets, some participants developed pain within six months, (PDP) will others did not (PNP). EEG features were extracted based on either band power or Higuchi fractal dimension (HFD). Three levels of generalisability were tested: (1) classification PDP vs. PNP in datasets A and B separately; (2) classification between groups in datasets A and B together; and (3) classification where one dataset (A or B) was used for training and testing, and the other for validation. A novel normalisation method was applied to HFD features. Results: Training and testing of individual datasets achieved classification accuracies of >80% using either feature set, and classification of joint datasets (A and B) achieved a maximum accuracy of 86.4% (HFD, support vector machine (SVM)). With normalisation and feature reduction (principal components), the validation accuracy was 66.6%. Conclusions: An SVM classifier with HFD features showed the best robustness, and normalisation improved the accuracy of predicting future neuropathic pain well above the chance level.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Biomedicines
Biomedicines Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-General Biochemistry,Genetics and Molecular Biology
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.50%
发文量
2823
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: Biomedicines (ISSN 2227-9059; CODEN: BIOMID) is an international, scientific, open access journal on biomedicines published quarterly online by MDPI.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信