Dexamethasone-based Prophylactic Therapy for Prevention of Post-Embolization Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Assessing its Efficacy and Influence of Dosage and Timing in Patients Undergoing Arterial Embolization.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE
Muhammad Zain Raza, Ali Ahmad Nadeem, Huzaifa Fayyaz Khwaja, Muhammad Omais, Hafiz Muhammad Ehsan Arshad, Musab Maqsood
{"title":"Dexamethasone-based Prophylactic Therapy for Prevention of Post-Embolization Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Assessing its Efficacy and Influence of Dosage and Timing in Patients Undergoing Arterial Embolization.","authors":"Muhammad Zain Raza, Ali Ahmad Nadeem, Huzaifa Fayyaz Khwaja, Muhammad Omais, Hafiz Muhammad Ehsan Arshad, Musab Maqsood","doi":"10.1016/j.avsg.2024.12.079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and objectives: </strong>Post-embolization syndrome (PES), characterized by pain, fever, nausea, and vomiting, is a common but non-serious adverse event following arterial embolization, negatively impacting patient satisfaction with the procedure. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of dexamethasone-based prophylactic therapy in preventing PES, as well as to assess the effects of its dosage and timing of administration.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic search was conducted across three databases, two trial registries, and citation searches to identify relevant studies. Data related to postoperative pain, fever, nausea, and vomiting were extracted and meta-analyzed using a random-effects model and the Mantel-Haenszel method. Meta-regression was performed to examine the role of dexamethasone dose and timing of administration as mediators.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Dexamethasone-based prophylactic therapy significantly reduced the risk of postoperative pain (RR=0.58, 95% CI: 0.48-0.69; P<0.00001), fever (RR=0.36, 95% CI: 0.22-0.61; P<0.00001), nausea (RR=0.52, 95% CI: 0.41-0.67; P<0.00001), and vomiting (RR=0.54, 95% CI: 0.36-0.82; P=0.004) compared to placebo or no treatment. A higher dose of dexamethasone was associated with a significantly lower incidence of postoperative pain (P=0.038). Regarding timing, postoperative and continuous (extending throughout the perioperative period) administration, was more effective than preoperative administration (P=0.024; P=0.007). A dosage of 6-12 mg was particularly effective in reducing the risk for all four symptoms.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dexamethasone effectively prevents PES in patients undergoing arterial embolization. An optimal protocol may involve a divided dose regimen within the range of 6-12 mg, extending throughout the recovery period for maximum benefit.</p>","PeriodicalId":8061,"journal":{"name":"Annals of vascular surgery","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of vascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.avsg.2024.12.079","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and objectives: Post-embolization syndrome (PES), characterized by pain, fever, nausea, and vomiting, is a common but non-serious adverse event following arterial embolization, negatively impacting patient satisfaction with the procedure. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of dexamethasone-based prophylactic therapy in preventing PES, as well as to assess the effects of its dosage and timing of administration.

Methods: A systematic search was conducted across three databases, two trial registries, and citation searches to identify relevant studies. Data related to postoperative pain, fever, nausea, and vomiting were extracted and meta-analyzed using a random-effects model and the Mantel-Haenszel method. Meta-regression was performed to examine the role of dexamethasone dose and timing of administration as mediators.

Results: Dexamethasone-based prophylactic therapy significantly reduced the risk of postoperative pain (RR=0.58, 95% CI: 0.48-0.69; P<0.00001), fever (RR=0.36, 95% CI: 0.22-0.61; P<0.00001), nausea (RR=0.52, 95% CI: 0.41-0.67; P<0.00001), and vomiting (RR=0.54, 95% CI: 0.36-0.82; P=0.004) compared to placebo or no treatment. A higher dose of dexamethasone was associated with a significantly lower incidence of postoperative pain (P=0.038). Regarding timing, postoperative and continuous (extending throughout the perioperative period) administration, was more effective than preoperative administration (P=0.024; P=0.007). A dosage of 6-12 mg was particularly effective in reducing the risk for all four symptoms.

Conclusion: Dexamethasone effectively prevents PES in patients undergoing arterial embolization. An optimal protocol may involve a divided dose regimen within the range of 6-12 mg, extending throughout the recovery period for maximum benefit.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
13.30%
发文量
603
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: Annals of Vascular Surgery, published eight times a year, invites original manuscripts reporting clinical and experimental work in vascular surgery for peer review. Articles may be submitted for the following sections of the journal: Clinical Research (reports of clinical series, new drug or medical device trials) Basic Science Research (new investigations, experimental work) Case Reports (reports on a limited series of patients) General Reviews (scholarly review of the existing literature on a relevant topic) Developments in Endovascular and Endoscopic Surgery Selected Techniques (technical maneuvers) Historical Notes (interesting vignettes from the early days of vascular surgery) Editorials/Correspondence
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信