Managing home oxygen and nasogastric feeds post-NICU discharge: PCP practices and perspectives.

IF 1.5 4区 医学 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Lauren Alexis Beard, Blair W Weikel, Kathleen E Hannan, Amanda I Messinger, Stephanie L Bourque
{"title":"Managing home oxygen and nasogastric feeds post-NICU discharge: PCP practices and perspectives.","authors":"Lauren Alexis Beard, Blair W Weikel, Kathleen E Hannan, Amanda I Messinger, Stephanie L Bourque","doi":"10.1055/a-2522-1708","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>NICU graduates are frequently technology dependent including home oxygen, pulse oximetry, and/or nasogastric (NG) feedings. Primary care provider (PCP) perceptions, practices, and barriers to managing these infants are not well described, especially at altitude. We sought to 1) describe PCP comfort and 2) determine practices and barriers in managing this technology at higher altitude.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>This cross-sectional survey assessed Colorado and Wyoming PCP perceptions and practices surrounding technology in NICU graduates. We explored bivariate analysis between clinic altitude, location, and provider's experience with comfort caring for infants discharged with technology using chi-squared or fisher's exact tests. Significant relationships were modeled using logistic regression for odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among 200 respondents, 82% were pediatricians and 86% practiced in urban/suburban environments. Clinic altitude ranged 2,500-9,000 feet. PCPs endorsed comfort managing oxygen in term (92%) and moderately/late preterm infants (82%), versus 52% comfort in very/extremely preterm infants. 62% utilized an oxygen weaning algorithm. Comfort managing oxygen was greater in suburban versus urban locations (OR 4.4, 95% CI 1.6-11.7) and providers practicing for > 10 versus < 5 years (OR 3.5, 95% CI 1.5, 8.4). 60% found pulse oximetry useful, though 70% perceived caregiver stress. 69% accepted infants on NG feeds, though 61% endorsed discomfort with management.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>PCPs are comfortable managing home oxygen in moderately preterm to term infants but find caring for the most preterm infants challenging. Discomfort in managing NG feeds is prevalent. This highlights peri-discharge barriers and improvement opportunities for high-risk, technology-dependent infants.</p>","PeriodicalId":7584,"journal":{"name":"American journal of perinatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American journal of perinatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2522-1708","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: NICU graduates are frequently technology dependent including home oxygen, pulse oximetry, and/or nasogastric (NG) feedings. Primary care provider (PCP) perceptions, practices, and barriers to managing these infants are not well described, especially at altitude. We sought to 1) describe PCP comfort and 2) determine practices and barriers in managing this technology at higher altitude.

Study design: This cross-sectional survey assessed Colorado and Wyoming PCP perceptions and practices surrounding technology in NICU graduates. We explored bivariate analysis between clinic altitude, location, and provider's experience with comfort caring for infants discharged with technology using chi-squared or fisher's exact tests. Significant relationships were modeled using logistic regression for odds ratios and 95% confidence intervals.

Results: Among 200 respondents, 82% were pediatricians and 86% practiced in urban/suburban environments. Clinic altitude ranged 2,500-9,000 feet. PCPs endorsed comfort managing oxygen in term (92%) and moderately/late preterm infants (82%), versus 52% comfort in very/extremely preterm infants. 62% utilized an oxygen weaning algorithm. Comfort managing oxygen was greater in suburban versus urban locations (OR 4.4, 95% CI 1.6-11.7) and providers practicing for > 10 versus < 5 years (OR 3.5, 95% CI 1.5, 8.4). 60% found pulse oximetry useful, though 70% perceived caregiver stress. 69% accepted infants on NG feeds, though 61% endorsed discomfort with management.

Conclusion: PCPs are comfortable managing home oxygen in moderately preterm to term infants but find caring for the most preterm infants challenging. Discomfort in managing NG feeds is prevalent. This highlights peri-discharge barriers and improvement opportunities for high-risk, technology-dependent infants.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American journal of perinatology
American journal of perinatology 医学-妇产科学
CiteScore
5.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
302
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Perinatology is an international, peer-reviewed, and indexed journal publishing 14 issues a year dealing with original research and topical reviews. It is the definitive forum for specialists in obstetrics, neonatology, perinatology, and maternal/fetal medicine, with emphasis on bridging the different fields. The focus is primarily on clinical and translational research, clinical and technical advances in diagnosis, monitoring, and treatment as well as evidence-based reviews. Topics of interest include epidemiology, diagnosis, prevention, and management of maternal, fetal, and neonatal diseases. Manuscripts on new technology, NICU set-ups, and nursing topics are published to provide a broad survey of important issues in this field. All articles undergo rigorous peer review, with web-based submission, expedited turn-around, and availability of electronic publication. The American Journal of Perinatology is accompanied by AJP Reports - an Open Access journal for case reports in neonatology and maternal/fetal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信