[Training Present and Future Doctors for Chile: How Many and For What? The Urgent Need to Review the Physician Quota Generation Model].

Miguel O'Ryan G, Pablo Roncagliolo B
{"title":"[Training Present and Future Doctors for Chile: How Many and For What? The Urgent Need to Review the Physician Quota Generation Model].","authors":"Miguel O'Ryan G, Pablo Roncagliolo B","doi":"10.4067/s0034-98872024000800909","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Before 1990, Chile showed fewer medical schools, six in total, increasing to 13 by 2000. From then on, there was an explosive increase, reaching 29 faculties or schools by 2024. Medical students increased from 1,816 in 2010 to 3,000 by 2024. The number of doctors in the country in 2010 was 24,455, rising to 65,737 by 2023, of which 25% are foreign professionals. In 2010, there was a ratio of 1.43 doctors per 1000 inhabitants, increasing to 3.13 by 2024, with a reasonable projection for 2034 close to 6, in other words, one doctor for every 170 inhabitants, reaching the OECD curve, surpassing WHO recommendations, and continuing to rise non-linearly. By 2024, one in two doctors practicing in Chile has one or more medical specialties. The Public Health System reported that in 2023, approximately one-third of the total available registered professionals working hours hired represented medical specialists (61%). Specialist doctor rates by region, as of September 2023, are relatively homogeneous, with higher rates tending to be in the southern part of the country. There is underrepresentation in non-metropolitan regions of specialties such as infectious diseases, emergency medicine, adult intensive care, neonatology, hematology, and pediatric neurology. However, for most specialties, this asymmetry is not observed. Compared to other countries, Chile, with a rate of 28.4 between 2012-2020, ranks 57 out of 200 countries with available data, presenting a rate of 1.64 specialist doctors per 1000 inhabitants, while the OECD average was 2.35. This strongly suggests that Chile will likely end up with an excessive number of doctors overall but with room to grow in specialist doctors. It is possible to envision interactions and coordination that could benefit the country without exceeding a regulated system; however, professional training should be avoided to continue unregulated and subject only to free will based on marketing strategies and demand rules. National and international studies assessing healthcare challenges for the coming decades and the professional capacities required to address them at the level of general medicine, primary specialties, and derived specialties are urgently needed. Regarding clinical fields, conducting a relevant study to determine the total public and private sector training capacity that may be part of the training system for the necessary clinical competencies is essential. Forming a working group with relevant stakeholders with knowledge, concern, and involvement would be significant, e.g., the Academy of Medicine, ASOFAMECH, medical schools, Ministry of Health, Ministry of Education, and community representatives. From our higher education perspective, with a nationwide vision, universities should start a joint reflection on our role in this critical topic with a future-oriented view.</p>","PeriodicalId":101370,"journal":{"name":"Revista medica de Chile","volume":"152 8","pages":"909-926"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista medica de Chile","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4067/s0034-98872024000800909","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Before 1990, Chile showed fewer medical schools, six in total, increasing to 13 by 2000. From then on, there was an explosive increase, reaching 29 faculties or schools by 2024. Medical students increased from 1,816 in 2010 to 3,000 by 2024. The number of doctors in the country in 2010 was 24,455, rising to 65,737 by 2023, of which 25% are foreign professionals. In 2010, there was a ratio of 1.43 doctors per 1000 inhabitants, increasing to 3.13 by 2024, with a reasonable projection for 2034 close to 6, in other words, one doctor for every 170 inhabitants, reaching the OECD curve, surpassing WHO recommendations, and continuing to rise non-linearly. By 2024, one in two doctors practicing in Chile has one or more medical specialties. The Public Health System reported that in 2023, approximately one-third of the total available registered professionals working hours hired represented medical specialists (61%). Specialist doctor rates by region, as of September 2023, are relatively homogeneous, with higher rates tending to be in the southern part of the country. There is underrepresentation in non-metropolitan regions of specialties such as infectious diseases, emergency medicine, adult intensive care, neonatology, hematology, and pediatric neurology. However, for most specialties, this asymmetry is not observed. Compared to other countries, Chile, with a rate of 28.4 between 2012-2020, ranks 57 out of 200 countries with available data, presenting a rate of 1.64 specialist doctors per 1000 inhabitants, while the OECD average was 2.35. This strongly suggests that Chile will likely end up with an excessive number of doctors overall but with room to grow in specialist doctors. It is possible to envision interactions and coordination that could benefit the country without exceeding a regulated system; however, professional training should be avoided to continue unregulated and subject only to free will based on marketing strategies and demand rules. National and international studies assessing healthcare challenges for the coming decades and the professional capacities required to address them at the level of general medicine, primary specialties, and derived specialties are urgently needed. Regarding clinical fields, conducting a relevant study to determine the total public and private sector training capacity that may be part of the training system for the necessary clinical competencies is essential. Forming a working group with relevant stakeholders with knowledge, concern, and involvement would be significant, e.g., the Academy of Medicine, ASOFAMECH, medical schools, Ministry of Health, Ministry of Education, and community representatives. From our higher education perspective, with a nationwide vision, universities should start a joint reflection on our role in this critical topic with a future-oriented view.

为智利培训现在和未来的医生:有多少人,为什么?迫切需要审查医师配额生成模型]。
1990年以前,智利的医学院数量较少,总共只有6所,到2000年增加到13所。从那时起,有爆炸性的增长,到2024年达到29个学院或学校。医科学生从2010年的1816人增加到2024年的3000人。2010年,全国医生人数为24,455人,到2023年将增至65,737人,其中25%是外国专业人士。2010年,每1000名居民拥有1.43名医生,到2024年将增至3.13名,合理预测2034年将接近6名,即每170名居民拥有1名医生,达到经合组织曲线,超过世卫组织建议,并继续非线性上升。到2024年,智利每两个执业医生中就有一个拥有一个或多个医学专业。公共卫生系统报告说,在2023年,大约三分之一的可用注册专业人员的工作时间被雇用为医学专家(61%)。截至2023年9月,按地区划分的专科医生比率相对均匀,该国南部地区的比率往往较高。在非大都市地区,传染病、急诊医学、成人重症监护、新生儿学、血液学和儿科神经病学等专业的代表性不足。然而,对于大多数专业来说,这种不对称是没有观察到的。与其他国家相比,智利在2012年至2020年期间的专科医生比率为28.4,在200个有数据的国家中排名第57,每1000名居民的专科医生比率为1.64,而经合组织的平均水平为2.35。这强烈表明,智利最终可能会出现医生总数过多,但专科医生有增长空间的情况。可以设想,在不超出监管体系的情况下,相互作用和协调可以使国家受益;但是,应避免专业培训继续不受管制,只受基于营销策略和需求规则的自由意志的支配。目前迫切需要评估未来几十年医疗保健挑战的国家和国际研究,以及在全科医学、初级专业和派生专业水平上解决这些挑战所需的专业能力。就临床领域而言,开展相关研究,以确定公共和私营部门的总培训能力,这些培训能力可能是必要临床能力培训系统的一部分,这一点至关重要。与具有知识、关注和参与的相关利益攸关方组成一个工作组将具有重要意义,例如,医学院、ASOFAMECH、医学院、卫生部、教育部和社区代表。从高等教育的角度,从全国的视野出发,大学应该以面向未来的眼光,开始共同反思我们在这个关键问题上的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信