Urinary Continence After Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy Using the Peritoneal Fixation Technique

IF 0.9 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Hideyuki Terao, Hirotaka Nagasaka, Shotaro Yamamoto, Atsuto Suzuki, Kimitsugu Usui, Takeshi Kishida, Noboru Nakaigawa
{"title":"Urinary Continence After Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Radical Prostatectomy Using the Peritoneal Fixation Technique","authors":"Hideyuki Terao,&nbsp;Hirotaka Nagasaka,&nbsp;Shotaro Yamamoto,&nbsp;Atsuto Suzuki,&nbsp;Kimitsugu Usui,&nbsp;Takeshi Kishida,&nbsp;Noboru Nakaigawa","doi":"10.1111/ases.70000","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>The Retzius-sparing technique for prostate cancer has shown favorable continence recovery outcomes. Magnetic resonance imaging after Retzius-sparing showed that the bladder anterior wall is widely connected to the abdominal wall, which contributes to urinary continence. We aimed to evaluate whether the Peritoneal Fixation technique, which involves suturing the anterior bladder wall onto the abdominal wall above the pubic bone, contributes to the recovery of urinary continence.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Patients who underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy between May and September 2023 were included in the study. We investigated urinary incontinence on the day of catheter removal and 1 month postoperatively. The posterior urethral angle was evaluated at rest and under abdominal pressure.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>A total of 54 patients who underwent the Peritoneal Fixation technique (<i>n</i> = 27) and conventional surgery (<i>n</i> = 27) were included. The continence acquisition rate on the day after catheter removal was significantly higher in the Peritoneal Fixation group (40.7%) than in the conventional group (7.4%) (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). At 1 month postoperatively, the Peritoneal Fixation group showed favorable results, with a continence rate of 44.4% compared with 29.6% in the conventional group (<i>p</i> = 0.26). The change in the posterior urethral angle at rest and during abdominal pressure significantly differed between the Peritoneal Fixation and conventional groups (−3.0° vs. 2.7°; <i>p</i> &lt; 0.05), indicating that the urethra is being pushed from the rectal side in the Peritoneal Fixation group.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>The use of the Peritoneal Fixation technique for prostate cancer suggests the potential for achieving favorable urinary continence outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":47019,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery","volume":"18 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ases.70000","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

The Retzius-sparing technique for prostate cancer has shown favorable continence recovery outcomes. Magnetic resonance imaging after Retzius-sparing showed that the bladder anterior wall is widely connected to the abdominal wall, which contributes to urinary continence. We aimed to evaluate whether the Peritoneal Fixation technique, which involves suturing the anterior bladder wall onto the abdominal wall above the pubic bone, contributes to the recovery of urinary continence.

Methods

Patients who underwent robot-assisted laparoscopic radical prostatectomy between May and September 2023 were included in the study. We investigated urinary incontinence on the day of catheter removal and 1 month postoperatively. The posterior urethral angle was evaluated at rest and under abdominal pressure.

Results

A total of 54 patients who underwent the Peritoneal Fixation technique (n = 27) and conventional surgery (n = 27) were included. The continence acquisition rate on the day after catheter removal was significantly higher in the Peritoneal Fixation group (40.7%) than in the conventional group (7.4%) (p < 0.05). At 1 month postoperatively, the Peritoneal Fixation group showed favorable results, with a continence rate of 44.4% compared with 29.6% in the conventional group (p = 0.26). The change in the posterior urethral angle at rest and during abdominal pressure significantly differed between the Peritoneal Fixation and conventional groups (−3.0° vs. 2.7°; p < 0.05), indicating that the urethra is being pushed from the rectal side in the Peritoneal Fixation group.

Conclusion

The use of the Peritoneal Fixation technique for prostate cancer suggests the potential for achieving favorable urinary continence outcomes.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
10.00%
发文量
129
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信