Benchmarking of Multispectral Pansharpening: Reproducibility, Assessment, and Meta-Analysis.

Abstract

The term pansharpening denotes the process by which the geometric resolution of a multiband image is increased by means of a co-registered broadband panchromatic observation of the same scene having greater spatial resolution. Over time, the benchmarking of pansharpening methods has revealed itself to be more challenging than the development of new methods. Their recent proliferation in the literature is mostly due to the lack of a standardized assessment. In this paper, we draw guidelines for correct and fair comparative evaluation of pansharpening methods, focusing on the reproducibility of results and resorting to concepts of meta-analysis. As a major outcome of this study, an improved version of the additive wavelet luminance proportional (AWLP) pansharpening algorithm offers all of the favorable characteristics of an ideal benchmark, namely, performance, speed, absence of adjustable running parameters, reproducibility of results with varying datasets and landscapes, and automatic correction of the path radiance term introduced by the atmosphere. The proposed benchmarking protocol employs the haze-corrected AWLP-H and exploits meta-analysis for cross-comparisons among different experiments. After assessment on five different datasets, it was found to provide reliable and consistent results in ranking different fusion methods.