Ajit C Tamhane, Dong Xi, Cyrus R Mehta, Alexander Romanenko, Jiangtao Gou
{"title":"Testing One Primary and Two Secondary Endpoints in a Two-Stage Group Sequential Trial With Extensions.","authors":"Ajit C Tamhane, Dong Xi, Cyrus R Mehta, Alexander Romanenko, Jiangtao Gou","doi":"10.1002/sim.10346","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We study the problem of testing multiple secondary endpoints conditional on a primary endpoint being significant in a two-stage group sequential procedure, focusing on two secondary endpoints. This extends our previous work with one secondary endpoint. The test for the secondary null hypotheses is a closed procedure. Application of the Bonferroni test for testing the intersection of the secondary hypotheses results in the Holm procedure while application of the Simes test results in the Hochberg procedure. The focus of the present paper is on developing normal theory analogs of the abovementioned <math> <semantics><mrow><mi>p</mi></mrow> <annotation>$$ p $$</annotation></semantics> </math> -value based tests that take into account (i) the gatekeeping effect of the test on the primary endpoint and (ii) correlations between the endpoints. The normal theory boundaries are determined by finding the least favorable configuration of the correlations and so their knowledge is not needed to apply these procedures. The <math> <semantics><mrow><mi>p</mi></mrow> <annotation>$$ p $$</annotation></semantics> </math> -value based procedures are easy to apply but they are less powerful than their normal theory analogs because they do not take into account the correlations between the endpoints and the gatekeeping effect referred to above. On the other hand, the normal theory procedures are restricted to two secondary endpoints and two stages mainly because of computational difficulties with more than two secondary endpoints and stages. Comparisons between the two types of procedures are given in terms of secondary powers. The sensitivity of the secondary type I error rate and power to unequal information times is studied. Numerical examples and a real case study illustrate the procedures.</p>","PeriodicalId":21879,"journal":{"name":"Statistics in Medicine","volume":"44 3-4","pages":"e10346"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11758265/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Statistics in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.10346","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MATHEMATICAL & COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
We study the problem of testing multiple secondary endpoints conditional on a primary endpoint being significant in a two-stage group sequential procedure, focusing on two secondary endpoints. This extends our previous work with one secondary endpoint. The test for the secondary null hypotheses is a closed procedure. Application of the Bonferroni test for testing the intersection of the secondary hypotheses results in the Holm procedure while application of the Simes test results in the Hochberg procedure. The focus of the present paper is on developing normal theory analogs of the abovementioned -value based tests that take into account (i) the gatekeeping effect of the test on the primary endpoint and (ii) correlations between the endpoints. The normal theory boundaries are determined by finding the least favorable configuration of the correlations and so their knowledge is not needed to apply these procedures. The -value based procedures are easy to apply but they are less powerful than their normal theory analogs because they do not take into account the correlations between the endpoints and the gatekeeping effect referred to above. On the other hand, the normal theory procedures are restricted to two secondary endpoints and two stages mainly because of computational difficulties with more than two secondary endpoints and stages. Comparisons between the two types of procedures are given in terms of secondary powers. The sensitivity of the secondary type I error rate and power to unequal information times is studied. Numerical examples and a real case study illustrate the procedures.
我们研究了在两个阶段组序列过程中,在一个主要终点显著的条件下检验多个次要终点的问题,重点研究了两个次要终点。这扩展了我们以前的工作,有一个次要端点。次要零假设的检验是一个封闭的过程。应用Bonferroni检验来检验次要假设的交集,结果在Holm程序中,而应用Simes检验结果在Hochberg程序中。本文的重点是开发上述p $$ p $$值测试的正常理论类似物,这些测试考虑到(i)测试对主要端点的把关效应和(ii)端点之间的相关性。正常的理论边界是通过找到最不利的相关配置来确定的,因此应用这些程序不需要他们的知识。基于p $$ p $$值的程序很容易应用,但它们不如它们的正常理论类似物强大,因为它们没有考虑端点之间的相关性和上面提到的守门人效应。另一方面,常规的理论过程被限制在两个次要端点和两个阶段,主要是因为两个以上的次要端点和阶段的计算困难。从二次幂的角度对这两种程序进行了比较。研究了二次I型错误率和功率对不等信息时间的敏感性。数值示例和实际案例研究说明了该过程。
期刊介绍:
The journal aims to influence practice in medicine and its associated sciences through the publication of papers on statistical and other quantitative methods. Papers will explain new methods and demonstrate their application, preferably through a substantive, real, motivating example or a comprehensive evaluation based on an illustrative example. Alternatively, papers will report on case-studies where creative use or technical generalizations of established methodology is directed towards a substantive application. Reviews of, and tutorials on, general topics relevant to the application of statistics to medicine will also be published. The main criteria for publication are appropriateness of the statistical methods to a particular medical problem and clarity of exposition. Papers with primarily mathematical content will be excluded. The journal aims to enhance communication between statisticians, clinicians and medical researchers.