Prophylactic Use of Cardiac Medications and Survival in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy.

IF 2.8 3区 医学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Muscle & Nerve Pub Date : 2025-01-24 DOI:10.1002/mus.28353
Kristin M Conway, Shiny Thomas, Tahereh Neyaz, Emma Ciafaloni, Joshua R Mann, Michelle Staron-Ehlinger, Gary S Beasley, Paul A Romitti, Katherine D Mathews
{"title":"Prophylactic Use of Cardiac Medications and Survival in Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy.","authors":"Kristin M Conway, Shiny Thomas, Tahereh Neyaz, Emma Ciafaloni, Joshua R Mann, Michelle Staron-Ehlinger, Gary S Beasley, Paul A Romitti, Katherine D Mathews","doi":"10.1002/mus.28353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction/aims: </strong>Prophylactic treatment of left ventricular dysfunction (LVD) in Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) delays onset of LVD, but there is limited data showing impact on survival. Our aim was to describe survival among treated and untreated individuals with DMD.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective, population-based surveillance data from the Muscular Dystrophy Surveillance, Tracking and Research Network (MD STARnet) were used. We analyzed 327 males with DMD born between 1982 and 2009 who were at least 6 years old at the last visit and who initiated cardiac prophylactic medication before age 14 years. Death status was ascertained through vital record linkages and medical record review. Prophylaxis was defined as cardiac medication use at least 1 year before LVD onset (ejection fraction < 55% or shortening fraction < 28%). Age at first visit, corticosteroid use, scoliosis surgery, initiation of noninvasive ventilation, and loss of ambulation were also coded. Cox Proportional Hazard modeling with time-varying covariates describes associations.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Prophylactic cardiac treatment was documented for 27.7% (n = 90); corticosteroids were used by 60.9% (n = 157). Adjusting for age at first visit and MD STARnet site, prophylactic treatment was associated with a 54% lower hazard of death (HR = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.22-0.93) compared to no prophylaxis. Adjusting for selected clinical covariates did not appreciably change the estimate (HR = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.22-0.99).</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Initiation of cardiac medication when left ventricular function is normal was associated with prolonged survival in this study of males with DMD. Only one-quarter of individuals received this treatment, however, indicating a topic of focus for improving care.</p>","PeriodicalId":18968,"journal":{"name":"Muscle & Nerve","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Muscle & Nerve","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mus.28353","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction/aims: Prophylactic treatment of left ventricular dysfunction (LVD) in Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) delays onset of LVD, but there is limited data showing impact on survival. Our aim was to describe survival among treated and untreated individuals with DMD.

Methods: Retrospective, population-based surveillance data from the Muscular Dystrophy Surveillance, Tracking and Research Network (MD STARnet) were used. We analyzed 327 males with DMD born between 1982 and 2009 who were at least 6 years old at the last visit and who initiated cardiac prophylactic medication before age 14 years. Death status was ascertained through vital record linkages and medical record review. Prophylaxis was defined as cardiac medication use at least 1 year before LVD onset (ejection fraction < 55% or shortening fraction < 28%). Age at first visit, corticosteroid use, scoliosis surgery, initiation of noninvasive ventilation, and loss of ambulation were also coded. Cox Proportional Hazard modeling with time-varying covariates describes associations.

Results: Prophylactic cardiac treatment was documented for 27.7% (n = 90); corticosteroids were used by 60.9% (n = 157). Adjusting for age at first visit and MD STARnet site, prophylactic treatment was associated with a 54% lower hazard of death (HR = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.22-0.93) compared to no prophylaxis. Adjusting for selected clinical covariates did not appreciably change the estimate (HR = 0.46, 95% CI = 0.22-0.99).

Discussion: Initiation of cardiac medication when left ventricular function is normal was associated with prolonged survival in this study of males with DMD. Only one-quarter of individuals received this treatment, however, indicating a topic of focus for improving care.

求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Muscle & Nerve
Muscle & Nerve 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
287
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Muscle & Nerve is an international and interdisciplinary publication of original contributions, in both health and disease, concerning studies of the muscle, the neuromuscular junction, the peripheral motor, sensory and autonomic neurons, and the central nervous system where the behavior of the peripheral nervous system is clarified. Appearing monthly, Muscle & Nerve publishes clinical studies and clinically relevant research reports in the fields of anatomy, biochemistry, cell biology, electrophysiology and electrodiagnosis, epidemiology, genetics, immunology, pathology, pharmacology, physiology, toxicology, and virology. The Journal welcomes articles and reports on basic clinical electrophysiology and electrodiagnosis. We expedite some papers dealing with timely topics to keep up with the fast-moving pace of science, based on the referees'' recommendation.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信