Association between pituitary adenoma consistency, resection techniques, and patient outcomes: a single-institution experience.

IF 3.5 2区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Gage A Guerra, Zain Kashif, David J Cote, Jeffrey J Feng, Alex Renn, Max Yang, Stephanie Cheok, Racheal Peterson, Mark S Shiroishi, John D Carmichael, Gabriel Zada
{"title":"Association between pituitary adenoma consistency, resection techniques, and patient outcomes: a single-institution experience.","authors":"Gage A Guerra, Zain Kashif, David J Cote, Jeffrey J Feng, Alex Renn, Max Yang, Stephanie Cheok, Racheal Peterson, Mark S Shiroishi, John D Carmichael, Gabriel Zada","doi":"10.3171/2024.8.JNS232715","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The present study aimed to investigate the association between pituitary adenoma (PA) consistency and other measurable tumor characteristics, extent of resection (EOR), postoperative complications, and outcomes.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In total, 507 PA resections were intraoperatively assigned a consistency grade from 1 (cystic/hemorrhagic tumors) to 5 (calcified tumors) based on intraoperative tumor characteristics. Tumor consistency was analyzed in tertiles (grades 1 and 2, grade 3, and grades 4 and 5) to determine associations with tumor characteristics, EOR, recurrence, postoperative outcomes, and complications.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The cohort in this study included primarily macroadenomas (93.3%) comprised mostly of nonfunctional PAs (NFPAs) (79.5%), with 77.1% showing suprasellar extension, 16.6% showing infrasellar invasion, and 46.4% showing cavernous sinus invasion (CSI). PA consistency grades were as follows: grade 1 or 2 (40.6%), grade 3 (39.3%), and grade 4 or 5 (20.1%). Compared with grade 1 or 2, higher-consistency PAs were more common in men (p = 0.001) and trended toward lower rates of gross-total resection (GTR) (67.6% vs 53.5%, p = 0.06). Higher PA consistency was predictive of any postoperative complication (OR 1.23, 95% CI 1.05-1.43; p = 0.009), specifically including transient diabetes insipidus (DI) (OR 1.45, 95% CI 1.12-1.85; p = 0.004) and cranial nerve (CN) paresis (OR 3.45, 95% CI 1.56-7.69; p = 0.002). Higher consistency was a strong predictor of CN palsy (OR 3.33, 95% CI 1.52-7.30; p = 0.004) for NFPAs. Higher-consistency PAs were more frequently adrenocorticotropic hormone-positive in both univariable (OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.11-1.60; p = 0.002) and multivariable (OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.11-1.69; p = 0.004) analyses. Higher consistency was associated with lower rates of GTR on stratification by CSI for Knosp grade 3 (p < 0.001) and grade 4 (p < 0.001) PAs, but not in low-grade (Knosp grades 1 and 2) PAs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Tumor consistency is an important consideration for the resection strategy, particularly for PAs with CSI, and a predictor of intraoperative CSF leaks and perioperative complications and outcomes, including EOR, CN paresis, and transient DI.</p>","PeriodicalId":16505,"journal":{"name":"Journal of neurosurgery","volume":" ","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":3.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of neurosurgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3171/2024.8.JNS232715","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The present study aimed to investigate the association between pituitary adenoma (PA) consistency and other measurable tumor characteristics, extent of resection (EOR), postoperative complications, and outcomes.

Methods: In total, 507 PA resections were intraoperatively assigned a consistency grade from 1 (cystic/hemorrhagic tumors) to 5 (calcified tumors) based on intraoperative tumor characteristics. Tumor consistency was analyzed in tertiles (grades 1 and 2, grade 3, and grades 4 and 5) to determine associations with tumor characteristics, EOR, recurrence, postoperative outcomes, and complications.

Results: The cohort in this study included primarily macroadenomas (93.3%) comprised mostly of nonfunctional PAs (NFPAs) (79.5%), with 77.1% showing suprasellar extension, 16.6% showing infrasellar invasion, and 46.4% showing cavernous sinus invasion (CSI). PA consistency grades were as follows: grade 1 or 2 (40.6%), grade 3 (39.3%), and grade 4 or 5 (20.1%). Compared with grade 1 or 2, higher-consistency PAs were more common in men (p = 0.001) and trended toward lower rates of gross-total resection (GTR) (67.6% vs 53.5%, p = 0.06). Higher PA consistency was predictive of any postoperative complication (OR 1.23, 95% CI 1.05-1.43; p = 0.009), specifically including transient diabetes insipidus (DI) (OR 1.45, 95% CI 1.12-1.85; p = 0.004) and cranial nerve (CN) paresis (OR 3.45, 95% CI 1.56-7.69; p = 0.002). Higher consistency was a strong predictor of CN palsy (OR 3.33, 95% CI 1.52-7.30; p = 0.004) for NFPAs. Higher-consistency PAs were more frequently adrenocorticotropic hormone-positive in both univariable (OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.11-1.60; p = 0.002) and multivariable (OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.11-1.69; p = 0.004) analyses. Higher consistency was associated with lower rates of GTR on stratification by CSI for Knosp grade 3 (p < 0.001) and grade 4 (p < 0.001) PAs, but not in low-grade (Knosp grades 1 and 2) PAs.

Conclusions: Tumor consistency is an important consideration for the resection strategy, particularly for PAs with CSI, and a predictor of intraoperative CSF leaks and perioperative complications and outcomes, including EOR, CN paresis, and transient DI.

垂体腺瘤一致性、切除技术和患者预后之间的关系:一个单一机构的经验。
目的:本研究旨在探讨垂体腺瘤(PA)一致性与其他可测量的肿瘤特征、切除程度(EOR)、术后并发症和预后之间的关系。方法:总共507例PA切除术,术中根据肿瘤特征将一致性评分从1(囊性/出血性肿瘤)到5(钙化肿瘤)。肿瘤一致性按分类(1级和2级、3级和4级和5级)进行分析,以确定与肿瘤特征、EOR、复发、术后结局和并发症的关系。结果:本研究的队列主要包括大腺瘤(93.3%),主要由非功能性PAs (nfpa)(79.5%)组成,77.1%表现为鞍上延伸,16.6%表现为鞍下侵犯,46.4%表现为海绵窦侵犯(CSI)。PA一致性等级为:1级或2级(40.6%),3级(39.3%),4级或5级(20.1%)。与1级或2级相比,高一致性PAs在男性中更常见(p = 0.001),并且倾向于较低的总切除率(GTR) (67.6% vs 53.5%, p = 0.06)。较高的PA一致性可预测任何术后并发症(OR 1.23, 95% CI 1.05-1.43;p = 0.009),特别是包括短暂性尿崩症(DI) (OR 1.45, 95% CI 1.12-1.85;p = 0.004)和脑神经麻痹(OR 3.45, 95% CI 1.56-7.69;P = 0.002)。较高的一致性是CN性麻痹的有力预测因子(OR 3.33, 95% CI 1.52-7.30;p = 0.004)。在两项单变量中,高一致性PAs更常呈促肾上腺皮质激素阳性(OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.11-1.60;p = 0.002)和多变量(OR 1.38, 95% CI 1.11-1.69;P = 0.004)分析。对于Knosp 3级(p < 0.001)和4级(p < 0.001) PAs,较高的一致性与较低的CSI分层GTR率相关,但对于低级别(Knosp 1级和2级)PAs则不相关。结论:肿瘤一致性是切除策略的重要考虑因素,特别是对于伴有CSI的PAs,并且是术中脑脊液泄漏和围手术期并发症和结局的预测因素,包括EOR、CN麻痹和一过性DI。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of neurosurgery
Journal of neurosurgery 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
7.30%
发文量
1003
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics, and Neurosurgical Focus are devoted to the publication of original works relating primarily to neurosurgery, including studies in clinical neurophysiology, organic neurology, ophthalmology, radiology, pathology, and molecular biology. The Editors and Editorial Boards encourage submission of clinical and laboratory studies. Other manuscripts accepted for review include technical notes on instruments or equipment that are innovative or useful to clinicians and researchers in the field of neuroscience; papers describing unusual cases; manuscripts on historical persons or events related to neurosurgery; and in Neurosurgical Focus, occasional reviews. Letters to the Editor commenting on articles recently published in the Journal of Neurosurgery, Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, and Journal of Neurosurgery: Pediatrics are welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信