Machine Learning to Predict Mortality in Older Patients With Cancer: Development and External Validation of the Geriatric Cancer Scoring System Using Two Large French Cohorts.

IF 42.1 1区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY
Journal of Clinical Oncology Pub Date : 2025-04-20 Epub Date: 2025-01-24 DOI:10.1200/JCO.24.00117
Etienne Audureau, Pierre Soubeyran, Claudia Martinez-Tapia, Carine Bellera, Sylvie Bastuji-Garin, Pascaline Boudou-Rouquette, Anne Chahwakilian, Thomas Grellety, Olivier Hanon, Simone Mathoulin-Pélissier, Elena Paillaud, Florence Canouï-Poitrine
{"title":"Machine Learning to Predict Mortality in Older Patients With Cancer: Development and External Validation of the Geriatric Cancer Scoring System Using Two Large French Cohorts.","authors":"Etienne Audureau, Pierre Soubeyran, Claudia Martinez-Tapia, Carine Bellera, Sylvie Bastuji-Garin, Pascaline Boudou-Rouquette, Anne Chahwakilian, Thomas Grellety, Olivier Hanon, Simone Mathoulin-Pélissier, Elena Paillaud, Florence Canouï-Poitrine","doi":"10.1200/JCO.24.00117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Establishing an accurate prognosis remains challenging in older patients with cancer because of the population's heterogeneity and the current predictive models' reduced ability to capture the complex interactions between oncologic and geriatric predictors. We aim to develop and externally validate a new predictive score (the Geriatric Cancer Scoring System [GCSS]) to refine individualized prognosis for older patients with cancer during the first year after a geriatric assessment (GA).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Data were collected from two French prospective multicenter cohorts of patients with cancer 70 years and older, referred for GA: ELCAPA (training set January 2007-March 2016) and ONCODAGE (validation set August 2008-March 2010). Candidate predictors included baseline oncologic and geriatric factors and routine biomarkers. We built predictive models using Cox regression, single decision tree (DT), and random survival forest (RSF) methods, comparing their predictive performance for 3-, 6-, and 12-month mortalities by computing time-dependent area under the receiver operator curve (tAUC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 2,012 and 1,397 patients were included in the training and validation set, respectively (mean age: 81 ± 6 years/78 ± 5 years; women: 47%/70%; metastatic cancer: 50%/34%; 12-month mortality: 43%/16%). Tumor site/metastatic status, cancer treatment, weight loss, ≥five prescription drugs, impaired functional status and mobility, abnormal G-8 score, low creatinine clearance, and elevated C-reactive protein (CRP)/albumin were identified as relevant predictors in the Cox model. DT and RSF identified more complex combinations of features, with G-8 score, tumor site/metastatic status, and CRP/albumin ratio contributing most to the predictions. The RSF approach gave the highest tAUC (12 months: 0.87 [RSF], 0.82 [Cox], 0.82 [DT]) and was retained as the final model.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The GCSS on the basis of a machine learning approach applied to two large French cohorts gave an accurate externally validated mortality prediction. The GCSS might improve decision making and counseling in older patients with cancer referred for pretherapeutic GA. GCSS's generalizability must now be confirmed in an international setting.</p>","PeriodicalId":15384,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","volume":" ","pages":"1429-1440"},"PeriodicalIF":42.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/JCO.24.00117","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/24 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Establishing an accurate prognosis remains challenging in older patients with cancer because of the population's heterogeneity and the current predictive models' reduced ability to capture the complex interactions between oncologic and geriatric predictors. We aim to develop and externally validate a new predictive score (the Geriatric Cancer Scoring System [GCSS]) to refine individualized prognosis for older patients with cancer during the first year after a geriatric assessment (GA).

Materials and methods: Data were collected from two French prospective multicenter cohorts of patients with cancer 70 years and older, referred for GA: ELCAPA (training set January 2007-March 2016) and ONCODAGE (validation set August 2008-March 2010). Candidate predictors included baseline oncologic and geriatric factors and routine biomarkers. We built predictive models using Cox regression, single decision tree (DT), and random survival forest (RSF) methods, comparing their predictive performance for 3-, 6-, and 12-month mortalities by computing time-dependent area under the receiver operator curve (tAUC).

Results: A total of 2,012 and 1,397 patients were included in the training and validation set, respectively (mean age: 81 ± 6 years/78 ± 5 years; women: 47%/70%; metastatic cancer: 50%/34%; 12-month mortality: 43%/16%). Tumor site/metastatic status, cancer treatment, weight loss, ≥five prescription drugs, impaired functional status and mobility, abnormal G-8 score, low creatinine clearance, and elevated C-reactive protein (CRP)/albumin were identified as relevant predictors in the Cox model. DT and RSF identified more complex combinations of features, with G-8 score, tumor site/metastatic status, and CRP/albumin ratio contributing most to the predictions. The RSF approach gave the highest tAUC (12 months: 0.87 [RSF], 0.82 [Cox], 0.82 [DT]) and was retained as the final model.

Conclusion: The GCSS on the basis of a machine learning approach applied to two large French cohorts gave an accurate externally validated mortality prediction. The GCSS might improve decision making and counseling in older patients with cancer referred for pretherapeutic GA. GCSS's generalizability must now be confirmed in an international setting.

机器学习预测老年癌症患者死亡率:使用两个大型法国队列的老年癌症评分系统的开发和外部验证。
目的:在老年癌症患者中建立准确的预后仍然具有挑战性,因为人群的异质性和当前预测模型捕捉肿瘤和老年预测因子之间复杂相互作用的能力降低。我们的目标是开发并外部验证一种新的预测评分(老年癌症评分系统[GCSS]),以改善老年癌症患者在老年评估(GA)后第一年的个性化预后。材料和方法:数据来自两个法国前瞻性多中心队列,70岁及以上的癌症患者,参考GA: ELCAPA(2007年1月至2016年3月的训练集)和ONCODAGE(2008年8月至2010年3月的验证集)。候选预测因子包括基线肿瘤和老年因素以及常规生物标志物。我们使用Cox回归、单决策树(DT)和随机生存森林(RSF)方法建立预测模型,通过计算接受者操作符曲线下的时间依赖面积(tAUC),比较它们对3个月、6个月和12个月死亡率的预测性能。结果:共有2012例和1397例患者分别被纳入训练和验证集(平均年龄:81±6岁/78±5岁;女性:47% / 70%;转移性癌:50%/34%;12个月死亡率:43%/16%)。在Cox模型中,肿瘤部位/转移状态、癌症治疗、体重减轻、≥5种处方药、功能状态和活动能力受损、G-8评分异常、低肌酐清除率和c -反应蛋白(CRP)/白蛋白升高被确定为相关预测因素。DT和RSF确定了更复杂的特征组合,G-8评分、肿瘤部位/转移状态和CRP/白蛋白比对预测贡献最大。RSF方法的tAUC最高(12个月:0.87 [RSF], 0.82 [Cox], 0.82 [DT]),并被保留为最终模型。结论:基于机器学习方法的GCSS应用于两个大型法国队列,给出了准确的外部验证死亡率预测。GCSS可能会改善治疗前GA的老年癌症患者的决策和咨询。现在必须在国际环境中确认GCSS的普遍性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Journal of Clinical Oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
41.20
自引率
2.20%
发文量
8215
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Clinical Oncology serves its readers as the single most credible, authoritative resource for disseminating significant clinical oncology research. In print and in electronic format, JCO strives to publish the highest quality articles dedicated to clinical research. Original Reports remain the focus of JCO, but this scientific communication is enhanced by appropriately selected Editorials, Commentaries, Reviews, and other work that relate to the care of patients with cancer.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信