What matters to mothers: A qualitative exploration of pain and recovery after cesarean section.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Patricia Duch, Kim Ekelund, Helene Korvenius Nedergaard
{"title":"What matters to mothers: A qualitative exploration of pain and recovery after cesarean section.","authors":"Patricia Duch, Kim Ekelund, Helene Korvenius Nedergaard","doi":"10.1111/aas.14579","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Fast recovery after cesarean section is vital since the mother not only has to take care of herself but also the newborn. Recovery scores are useful tools to measure and compare recovery; however, standardized questionnaires may miss in-depth patient experiences. What is important to women in the postoperative period after cesarean section can vary in different populations, making it crucial to understand the specific needs of one's own population. This study aims to explore what matters most to Danish mothers during the early phase of recovery following elective cesarean section.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Qualitative design: Adult, Danish-speaking women undergoing elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia were included in three Danish hospitals. Semi-structured interviews focusing on women's experiences of recovery, pain, and mobilization both in hospital and after discharge were conducted for 4-7 days following their cesarean section. Baseline characteristics and maternal outcomes were collected from patient files. The interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using manifest content analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 25 women were interviewed a median of 6 days post cesarean section (IQR 5-8). Three themes emerged: \"Experience of being a cesarean section patient,\" \"I'm doing good - and better than expected,\" and \"Challenges when going home.\" The cesarean section itself was described as a disturbing experience. The initial days post-cesarean section were described as very painful, but hereafter, many patients expressed surprise at their rapid recovery. None used opioids after discharge. Post-discharge, having a partner's support, especially with other children to care for, was helpful, and moving from lying to sitting position and getting out of bed were noted as particularly painful. Many women requested more information and specific rehabilitation programs.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this qualitative study of Danish women 4-7 days after elective cesarean sections, the women described the initial days as very painful but felt that they recovered rather quickly thereafter. The study indicated a need for enhanced communication, especially regarding the experience of surgery, pain after cesarean section, and physical rehabilitation plans.</p><p><strong>Editorial comment: </strong>In this qualitative, explorative study, participants were interviewed by telephone 4-7 days following their elective cesarean section. The focus was the women's experience of recovery, pain, and mobilization, both in hospital and when going home. The findings identified a need for more information about the perioperative course, as most participants were surprised and unprepared both for the pain from other areas than the scar and for the surgery experience being unpleasant, and many requested physical rehabilitation plans.</p>","PeriodicalId":6909,"journal":{"name":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica","volume":"69 3","pages":"e14579"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11757011/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.14579","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Fast recovery after cesarean section is vital since the mother not only has to take care of herself but also the newborn. Recovery scores are useful tools to measure and compare recovery; however, standardized questionnaires may miss in-depth patient experiences. What is important to women in the postoperative period after cesarean section can vary in different populations, making it crucial to understand the specific needs of one's own population. This study aims to explore what matters most to Danish mothers during the early phase of recovery following elective cesarean section.

Methods: Qualitative design: Adult, Danish-speaking women undergoing elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia were included in three Danish hospitals. Semi-structured interviews focusing on women's experiences of recovery, pain, and mobilization both in hospital and after discharge were conducted for 4-7 days following their cesarean section. Baseline characteristics and maternal outcomes were collected from patient files. The interviews were recorded, transcribed verbatim, and analyzed using manifest content analysis.

Results: In total, 25 women were interviewed a median of 6 days post cesarean section (IQR 5-8). Three themes emerged: "Experience of being a cesarean section patient," "I'm doing good - and better than expected," and "Challenges when going home." The cesarean section itself was described as a disturbing experience. The initial days post-cesarean section were described as very painful, but hereafter, many patients expressed surprise at their rapid recovery. None used opioids after discharge. Post-discharge, having a partner's support, especially with other children to care for, was helpful, and moving from lying to sitting position and getting out of bed were noted as particularly painful. Many women requested more information and specific rehabilitation programs.

Conclusions: In this qualitative study of Danish women 4-7 days after elective cesarean sections, the women described the initial days as very painful but felt that they recovered rather quickly thereafter. The study indicated a need for enhanced communication, especially regarding the experience of surgery, pain after cesarean section, and physical rehabilitation plans.

Editorial comment: In this qualitative, explorative study, participants were interviewed by telephone 4-7 days following their elective cesarean section. The focus was the women's experience of recovery, pain, and mobilization, both in hospital and when going home. The findings identified a need for more information about the perioperative course, as most participants were surprised and unprepared both for the pain from other areas than the scar and for the surgery experience being unpleasant, and many requested physical rehabilitation plans.

对母亲来说重要的是:剖宫产术后疼痛和恢复的定性探索。
背景:剖宫产术后快速恢复至关重要,因为母亲不仅要照顾好自己,还要照顾好新生儿。恢复分数是衡量和比较恢复的有用工具;然而,标准化问卷可能会错过深入的患者体验。剖宫产术后对妇女的重要性在不同人群中可能有所不同,因此了解本国人群的具体需求至关重要。本研究旨在探讨丹麦母亲在择期剖宫产术后恢复的早期阶段最重要的事情。方法:定性设计:在丹麦三家医院接受脊髓麻醉下剖宫产术的成年丹麦语妇女。在剖宫产手术后的4-7天内,对妇女进行了半结构化访谈,重点关注她们在医院和出院后的康复、疼痛和活动经历。从患者档案中收集基线特征和产妇结局。访谈被记录下来,逐字转录,并使用清单内容分析进行分析。结果:共访谈25名妇女,中位时间为剖宫产术后6天(IQR 5-8)。三个主题出现了:“剖宫产病人的经历”,“我做得很好——比预期的要好”,以及“回家时的挑战”。剖宫产本身被描述为一种令人不安的经历。剖宫产术后的最初几天被描述为非常痛苦,但此后,许多患者对他们的快速恢复感到惊讶。出院后均未使用阿片类药物。出院后,有伴侣的支持,特别是有其他孩子需要照顾,是有帮助的,从躺着的姿势到坐着的姿势以及下床的姿势都被认为是特别痛苦的。许多妇女要求更多的信息和具体的康复方案。结论:在这项对丹麦妇女择期剖宫产后4-7天的定性研究中,妇女描述了最初的几天非常痛苦,但此后她们觉得自己恢复得相当快。研究表明需要加强沟通,特别是关于手术经验、剖宫产后疼痛和身体康复计划。编辑评论:在这项定性的探索性研究中,参与者在择期剖宫产术后4-7天接受电话采访。重点是妇女在医院和回家时的康复、疼痛和活动经历。研究结果表明,需要更多关于围手术期的信息,因为大多数参与者对疤痕以外其他部位的疼痛和手术经历的不愉快感到惊讶和措手不及,许多人要求物理康复计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
9.50%
发文量
157
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica publishes papers on original work in the fields of anaesthesiology, intensive care, pain, emergency medicine, and subjects related to their basic sciences, on condition that they are contributed exclusively to this Journal. Case reports and short communications may be considered for publication if of particular interest; also letters to the Editor, especially if related to already published material. The editorial board is free to discuss the publication of reviews on current topics, the choice of which, however, is the prerogative of the board. Every effort will be made by the Editors and selected experts to expedite a critical review of manuscripts in order to ensure rapid publication of papers of a high scientific standard.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信