High-dose glucocorticoids in the treatment of postoperative pain after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery-protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q2 ANESTHESIOLOGY
Bertram Vorm, Anni Nørgaard Jeppesen, Lene Mølgaard Hansen, Mads Lumholdt, Thomas Lass Klitgaard, Allan Vestergaard Danielsen, Peter Juhl-Olsen, Phillip Sperling, Jannie Bisgaard
{"title":"High-dose glucocorticoids in the treatment of postoperative pain after video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery-protocol for systematic review and meta-analysis.","authors":"Bertram Vorm, Anni Nørgaard Jeppesen, Lene Mølgaard Hansen, Mads Lumholdt, Thomas Lass Klitgaard, Allan Vestergaard Danielsen, Peter Juhl-Olsen, Phillip Sperling, Jannie Bisgaard","doi":"10.1111/aas.14577","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is widely used in lung cancer surgery, as this technique causes less pain and faster recovery than open thoracotomy. However, significant postoperative pain persists in a number of patients, often leading to increased opioid use and opioid-related adverse events in addition to prolonged admission times. Perioperatively administered glucocorticoids have been demonstrated effective in reducing pain after other types of surgeries, but the effect in VATS remains unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This systematic review will assess the impact of glucocorticoids on postoperative pain in adult patients undergoing VATS. We will include randomised trials comparing higher doses of glucocorticoids to lower doses, placebo or no treatment. The review will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis statement and Cochrane methodology. The certainty of evidence will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. The primary outcome is standardised dynamic pain scores within 24 h. Secondary outcomes are opioid use, time to first mobilisation, length of hospital stay and numeric rating score >3 at any point within the first 24 h following surgery. Exploratory outcomes are opioid-related adverse effects and glucocorticoid-related adverse effects classified in major and minor events. Data will be meta-analysed with sensitivity and subgroup analyses and trial sequential analyses. Furthermore, we will assess the risk of reporting bias and heterogeneity.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This systematic review and meta-analysis will provide an overview of the current evidence of how glucocorticoids affect postoperative pain and recovery in adult patients undergoing VATS.</p>","PeriodicalId":6909,"journal":{"name":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica","volume":"69 3","pages":"e14577"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11757097/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/aas.14577","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) is widely used in lung cancer surgery, as this technique causes less pain and faster recovery than open thoracotomy. However, significant postoperative pain persists in a number of patients, often leading to increased opioid use and opioid-related adverse events in addition to prolonged admission times. Perioperatively administered glucocorticoids have been demonstrated effective in reducing pain after other types of surgeries, but the effect in VATS remains unclear.

Methods: This systematic review will assess the impact of glucocorticoids on postoperative pain in adult patients undergoing VATS. We will include randomised trials comparing higher doses of glucocorticoids to lower doses, placebo or no treatment. The review will follow the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis statement and Cochrane methodology. The certainty of evidence will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation system. The primary outcome is standardised dynamic pain scores within 24 h. Secondary outcomes are opioid use, time to first mobilisation, length of hospital stay and numeric rating score >3 at any point within the first 24 h following surgery. Exploratory outcomes are opioid-related adverse effects and glucocorticoid-related adverse effects classified in major and minor events. Data will be meta-analysed with sensitivity and subgroup analyses and trial sequential analyses. Furthermore, we will assess the risk of reporting bias and heterogeneity.

Conclusion: This systematic review and meta-analysis will provide an overview of the current evidence of how glucocorticoids affect postoperative pain and recovery in adult patients undergoing VATS.

大剂量糖皮质激素治疗电视胸腔镜手术后疼痛——系统回顾和荟萃分析方案
背景:视频胸腔镜手术(VATS)广泛应用于肺癌手术,因为该技术比开胸手术疼痛更小,恢复更快。然而,在许多患者中,明显的术后疼痛持续存在,除了延长住院时间外,还经常导致阿片类药物使用增加和阿片类药物相关不良事件。围手术期使用糖皮质激素已被证明能有效减轻其他类型手术后的疼痛,但其在VATS中的效果尚不清楚。方法:本系统综述将评估糖皮质激素对成年VATS患者术后疼痛的影响。我们将纳入比较高剂量糖皮质激素与低剂量、安慰剂或不治疗的随机试验。本综述将遵循系统评价和荟萃分析声明的首选报告项目和Cochrane方法学。证据的确定性将采用建议分级评估、发展和评估系统进行评估。主要结果是24小时内的标准化动态疼痛评分。次要结局是阿片类药物的使用、首次活动的时间、住院时间和手术后24小时内任何时间点的数字评分>.3。探索性结果是阿片类药物相关的不良反应和糖皮质激素相关的不良反应,分为主要和次要事件。数据将进行meta分析,包括敏感性分析、亚组分析和试验序列分析。此外,我们将评估报告偏倚和异质性的风险。结论:本系统综述和荟萃分析将概述当前关于糖皮质激素如何影响成年VATS患者术后疼痛和恢复的证据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
9.50%
发文量
157
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica publishes papers on original work in the fields of anaesthesiology, intensive care, pain, emergency medicine, and subjects related to their basic sciences, on condition that they are contributed exclusively to this Journal. Case reports and short communications may be considered for publication if of particular interest; also letters to the Editor, especially if related to already published material. The editorial board is free to discuss the publication of reviews on current topics, the choice of which, however, is the prerogative of the board. Every effort will be made by the Editors and selected experts to expedite a critical review of manuscripts in order to ensure rapid publication of papers of a high scientific standard.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信