Camille Gerlier, Linda Mehenni, Gilles Chatellier, Marine Cachanado, Olivier Ganansia
{"title":"Improving benign paroxysmal positional vertigo management in the emergency department: A longitudinal study post-GRACE-3.","authors":"Camille Gerlier, Linda Mehenni, Gilles Chatellier, Marine Cachanado, Olivier Ganansia","doi":"10.1111/acem.15115","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Vertigo is a priority for training and decision support in emergency departments (ED). Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV), though manageable at bedside, remains frequently underdiagnosed and undertreated. This study assessed the effectiveness of a two-tiered educational intervention on posterior and horizontal BPPV management in the ED setting.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Longitudinal program evaluation study conducted over a year in a French ED, following GRACE-3 guidelines, involving patients with triggered episodic vestibular syndrome or brief vertigo without nystagmus. Two 6-month periods were compared: before (control cohort) and after (intervention cohort) an educational intervention of standardized training and an online decision support tool. The primary outcome was the prevalence of evidence-based BPPV diagnoses.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 382 patients included, 166 were in the control cohort (43.5%) and 216 were in the intervention cohort (56.5%). The intervention cohort had a higher rate of evidence-based BPPV diagnoses compared to the control cohort (38.0% vs. 16.9%), with an effect size of 21.1 (95% confidence interval [CI] 11.5-29.6, p < 0.0001). Canalith repositioning maneuvers were performed more frequently in the intervention cohort (90.2% vs. 57.7%), with an effect size of 33.1 (95% CI 13.2-53.1). Posttreatment tests showed a nonsignificant difference of 79.5% of intervention cohort patients testing negative versus 75.0% in the control cohort. ED length of stay was shorter in the intervention cohort (137 min vs. 247 min), with an effect size of -109.5 (95% CI -154.0 to -65.0). ED revisits within 1 month were similar (2.3% vs. 1.2%). During the intervention period, clinicians' satisfaction was correlated with the effectiveness of their clinical management.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>A standardized educational intervention demonstrated enhancing BPPV screening and improved evidence-based diagnosis, showing promise of more efficient treatment in the ED. Further multicenter studies are warranted to evaluate impacts on patient-reported outcomes and resource optimization.</p>","PeriodicalId":7105,"journal":{"name":"Academic Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"739-747"},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.15115","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Vertigo is a priority for training and decision support in emergency departments (ED). Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV), though manageable at bedside, remains frequently underdiagnosed and undertreated. This study assessed the effectiveness of a two-tiered educational intervention on posterior and horizontal BPPV management in the ED setting.
Methods: Longitudinal program evaluation study conducted over a year in a French ED, following GRACE-3 guidelines, involving patients with triggered episodic vestibular syndrome or brief vertigo without nystagmus. Two 6-month periods were compared: before (control cohort) and after (intervention cohort) an educational intervention of standardized training and an online decision support tool. The primary outcome was the prevalence of evidence-based BPPV diagnoses.
Results: Of the 382 patients included, 166 were in the control cohort (43.5%) and 216 were in the intervention cohort (56.5%). The intervention cohort had a higher rate of evidence-based BPPV diagnoses compared to the control cohort (38.0% vs. 16.9%), with an effect size of 21.1 (95% confidence interval [CI] 11.5-29.6, p < 0.0001). Canalith repositioning maneuvers were performed more frequently in the intervention cohort (90.2% vs. 57.7%), with an effect size of 33.1 (95% CI 13.2-53.1). Posttreatment tests showed a nonsignificant difference of 79.5% of intervention cohort patients testing negative versus 75.0% in the control cohort. ED length of stay was shorter in the intervention cohort (137 min vs. 247 min), with an effect size of -109.5 (95% CI -154.0 to -65.0). ED revisits within 1 month were similar (2.3% vs. 1.2%). During the intervention period, clinicians' satisfaction was correlated with the effectiveness of their clinical management.
Conclusions: A standardized educational intervention demonstrated enhancing BPPV screening and improved evidence-based diagnosis, showing promise of more efficient treatment in the ED. Further multicenter studies are warranted to evaluate impacts on patient-reported outcomes and resource optimization.
背景:眩晕是急诊科(ED)培训和决策支持的重点。良性阵发性体位性眩晕(BPPV)虽然在床边可以控制,但仍然经常被误诊和治疗不足。本研究评估了两层教育干预在急诊科后路和水平BPPV管理中的有效性。方法:在法国急诊科进行了一年多的纵向项目评估研究,遵循GRACE-3指南,涉及触发性发作性前庭综合征或无眼球震颤的短暂眩晕患者。比较两个为期6个月的时间段:在标准化培训和在线决策支持工具的教育干预之前(对照队列)和之后(干预队列)。主要结局是基于证据的BPPV诊断的患病率。结果:纳入的382例患者中,对照组166例(43.5%),干预组216例(56.5%)。干预组的BPPV循证诊出率高于对照组(38.0% vs. 16.9%),效应值为21.1(95%置信区间[CI] 11.5-29.6, p)。结论:标准化教育干预增强了BPPV筛查,改善了循证诊断,显示出ED治疗更有效的希望。需要进一步的多中心研究来评估对患者报告结果和资源优化的影响。
期刊介绍:
Academic Emergency Medicine (AEM) is the official monthly publication of the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM) and publishes information relevant to the practice, educational advancements, and investigation of emergency medicine. It is the second-largest peer-reviewed scientific journal in the specialty of emergency medicine.
The goal of AEM is to advance the science, education, and clinical practice of emergency medicine, to serve as a voice for the academic emergency medicine community, and to promote SAEM''s goals and objectives. Members and non-members worldwide depend on this journal for translational medicine relevant to emergency medicine, as well as for clinical news, case studies and more.
Each issue contains information relevant to the research, educational advancements, and practice in emergency medicine. Subject matter is diverse, including preclinical studies, clinical topics, health policy, and educational methods. The research of SAEM members contributes significantly to the scientific content and development of the journal.