{"title":"Collaborative spaces as places-of-entrepreneuring: A phenomenological investigation of entrepreneurs’ place-making experiences and practices","authors":"Pascal Dey, Amadou Lô, Pauline Fatien","doi":"10.1177/00187267241310701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Entrepreneurship scholars have become increasingly interested in new collaborative spaces—such as incubators, makerspaces, and coworking spaces—that support entrepreneurial ventures. However, limited attention has been paid to entrepreneurs’ embodied capacity to transform these collaborative spaces into places for entrepreneuring. In response, we propose a phenomenological perspective to advance theorizing on how entrepreneurs “do place” by experiencing and shaping the meaning, affective content, and materiality of their workplace in specific ways. Based on a longitudinal qualitative study of a coworking space in Paris, we identify three regimes of entrepreneur’s place-making: (a) collectively negotiating place-meaning, (b) manipulating place as a site of practical use, and (c) place-based identity forming. Our contribution is threefold. First, drawing on a diverse literature on phenomenology, and recent practice-based research, we argue that a dual focus on the embodied experiences and practices of entrepreneurs enables a more granular understanding of how collaborative spaces are enacted as “places-of-entrepreneuring.” Second, we show how “places-of-entrepreneuring” emerge from the skillful interweaving of different regimes of place-making. Third, we recommend that owners of collaborative spaces proactively promote place-making “by design” by encouraging entrepreneurs to become active producers, rather than passive users, of their work environments.","PeriodicalId":48433,"journal":{"name":"Human Relations","volume":"63 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Relations","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00187267241310701","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Entrepreneurship scholars have become increasingly interested in new collaborative spaces—such as incubators, makerspaces, and coworking spaces—that support entrepreneurial ventures. However, limited attention has been paid to entrepreneurs’ embodied capacity to transform these collaborative spaces into places for entrepreneuring. In response, we propose a phenomenological perspective to advance theorizing on how entrepreneurs “do place” by experiencing and shaping the meaning, affective content, and materiality of their workplace in specific ways. Based on a longitudinal qualitative study of a coworking space in Paris, we identify three regimes of entrepreneur’s place-making: (a) collectively negotiating place-meaning, (b) manipulating place as a site of practical use, and (c) place-based identity forming. Our contribution is threefold. First, drawing on a diverse literature on phenomenology, and recent practice-based research, we argue that a dual focus on the embodied experiences and practices of entrepreneurs enables a more granular understanding of how collaborative spaces are enacted as “places-of-entrepreneuring.” Second, we show how “places-of-entrepreneuring” emerge from the skillful interweaving of different regimes of place-making. Third, we recommend that owners of collaborative spaces proactively promote place-making “by design” by encouraging entrepreneurs to become active producers, rather than passive users, of their work environments.
期刊介绍:
Human Relations is an international peer reviewed journal, which publishes the highest quality original research to advance our understanding of social relationships at and around work through theoretical development and empirical investigation. Scope Human Relations seeks high quality research papers that extend our knowledge of social relationships at work and organizational forms, practices and processes that affect the nature, structure and conditions of work and work organizations. Human Relations welcomes manuscripts that seek to cross disciplinary boundaries in order to develop new perspectives and insights into social relationships and relationships between people and organizations. Human Relations encourages strong empirical contributions that develop and extend theory as well as more conceptual papers that integrate, critique and expand existing theory. Human Relations welcomes critical reviews and essays: - Critical reviews advance a field through new theory, new methods, a novel synthesis of extant evidence, or a combination of two or three of these elements. Reviews that identify new research questions and that make links between management and organizations and the wider social sciences are particularly welcome. Surveys or overviews of a field are unlikely to meet these criteria. - Critical essays address contemporary scholarly issues and debates within the journal''s scope. They are more controversial than conventional papers or reviews, and can be shorter. They argue a point of view, but must meet standards of academic rigour. Anyone with an idea for a critical essay is particularly encouraged to discuss it at an early stage with the Editor-in-Chief. Human Relations encourages research that relates social theory to social practice and translates knowledge about human relations into prospects for social action and policy-making that aims to improve working lives.