Synthetic data as external control arms in scarce single-arm clinical trials.

PLOS digital health Pub Date : 2025-01-23 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1371/journal.pdig.0000581
Severin Elvatun, Daan Knoors, Simon Brant, Christian Jonasson, Jan F Nygård
{"title":"Synthetic data as external control arms in scarce single-arm clinical trials.","authors":"Severin Elvatun, Daan Knoors, Simon Brant, Christian Jonasson, Jan F Nygård","doi":"10.1371/journal.pdig.0000581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>An external control arm based on health registry data can serve as an alternative comparator in single-arm drug development studies that lack a benchmark for comparison to the experimental treatment. However, accessing such observational healthcare data involves a lengthy and intricate application process, delaying drug approval studies and access to novel treatments. Clinical trials typically comprise only a few hundred patients usually with high-cardinality features, which makes individual data instances more exposed to re-identification attacks. We examine whether synthetic data can serve as a proxy for the empirical control arm data by providing the same research outcomes while reducing the risk of information disclosure. We propose a reversible data generalization procedure to address these particular data characteristics that can be used in conjunction with any generator algorithm. It reduces the input data cardinality pre-synthesis and reverses it post-synthesis to regain the original data structure. Finally, we test a selection of state-of-the-art generators against a suite of utility and privacy metrics. The external control arm benchmark was generated using data from Norwegian health registries. In this retrospective study, we compare various synthetic data generation algorithms in numerical experiments, focusing on the utility of the synthetic data to support the conclusions drawn from the empirical data, and analysing the risk of sensitive information disclosure. Our results indicate that data generalization is advantageous to enhance both data utility and privacy in smaller datasets with high cardinality. Moreover, the generator algorithms demonstrate the ability to generate synthetic data of high utility without compromising the confidentiality of the empirical data. Our finding suggests that synthetic external control arms could serve as a viable alternative to observational data in drug development studies, while reducing the risk of revealing sensitive patient information.</p>","PeriodicalId":74465,"journal":{"name":"PLOS digital health","volume":"4 1","pages":"e0000581"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11756779/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PLOS digital health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pdig.0000581","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

An external control arm based on health registry data can serve as an alternative comparator in single-arm drug development studies that lack a benchmark for comparison to the experimental treatment. However, accessing such observational healthcare data involves a lengthy and intricate application process, delaying drug approval studies and access to novel treatments. Clinical trials typically comprise only a few hundred patients usually with high-cardinality features, which makes individual data instances more exposed to re-identification attacks. We examine whether synthetic data can serve as a proxy for the empirical control arm data by providing the same research outcomes while reducing the risk of information disclosure. We propose a reversible data generalization procedure to address these particular data characteristics that can be used in conjunction with any generator algorithm. It reduces the input data cardinality pre-synthesis and reverses it post-synthesis to regain the original data structure. Finally, we test a selection of state-of-the-art generators against a suite of utility and privacy metrics. The external control arm benchmark was generated using data from Norwegian health registries. In this retrospective study, we compare various synthetic data generation algorithms in numerical experiments, focusing on the utility of the synthetic data to support the conclusions drawn from the empirical data, and analysing the risk of sensitive information disclosure. Our results indicate that data generalization is advantageous to enhance both data utility and privacy in smaller datasets with high cardinality. Moreover, the generator algorithms demonstrate the ability to generate synthetic data of high utility without compromising the confidentiality of the empirical data. Our finding suggests that synthetic external control arms could serve as a viable alternative to observational data in drug development studies, while reducing the risk of revealing sensitive patient information.

在稀缺的单臂临床试验中,合成数据作为外部对照。
在缺乏与实验治疗比较基准的单臂药物开发研究中,基于健康登记数据的外部对照臂可作为替代比较物。然而,访问此类观察性医疗保健数据涉及一个漫长而复杂的申请过程,延迟了药物批准研究和获得新疗法的时间。临床试验通常只包含几百名患者,通常具有高基数特征,这使得单个数据实例更容易受到重新识别攻击。我们检验了合成数据是否可以通过提供相同的研究结果,同时降低信息披露的风险,作为经验控制臂数据的代理。我们提出了一个可逆的数据泛化过程,以解决这些可以与任何生成器算法一起使用的特定数据特征。它减少了合成前的输入数据基数,并在合成后将其反转以恢复原始数据结构。最后,我们根据一套实用程序和隐私指标测试了一系列最先进的生成器。外部控制臂基准是使用来自挪威健康注册中心的数据生成的。在这一回顾性研究中,我们在数值实验中比较了各种合成数据生成算法,重点关注合成数据支持经验数据得出的结论的效用,并分析敏感信息披露的风险。我们的研究结果表明,数据泛化有利于提高具有高基数的小型数据集的数据效用和隐私性。此外,生成器算法证明了在不损害经验数据机密性的情况下生成高效用合成数据的能力。我们的发现表明,合成外部对照臂可以作为药物开发研究中观察数据的可行替代方案,同时降低泄露敏感患者信息的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信