Acceptability and Future Considerations for Telegenetic Counseling After the COVID Pandemic: Interviews with Genetic Counselors, Clinicians, and Patients.

IF 1.7 4区 医学 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Meghan C Martinez, Nina Szwerinski, Su-Ying Liang, Sharon Chan, Monique de Bruin, Cheryl D Stults
{"title":"Acceptability and Future Considerations for Telegenetic Counseling After the COVID Pandemic: Interviews with Genetic Counselors, Clinicians, and Patients.","authors":"Meghan C Martinez, Nina Szwerinski, Su-Ying Liang, Sharon Chan, Monique de Bruin, Cheryl D Stults","doi":"10.1177/00469580251314747","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While telegenetic counseling has increased substantially since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, previous studies reported concerns around building rapport, nonverbal communication, and the patient-counselor relationship. This qualitative evaluation elicited feedback from genetic counselors, referring clinicians, and patients from a single healthcare organization to understand the user-driven reasons for overall satisfaction and experience. We conducted 22 in-depth, semi-structured interviews with participants from all 3 groups between February 2022 and February 2023. Interview recordings were transcribed and analyzed using a pragmatic thematic approach. Participants across all groups felt the style and content of the genetic counseling visit lent itself perfectly to telegenetics specifically because of no physical exam component. Most patient and counselor participants expressed having the genetic counseling over phone or video had no impact on the patient-counselor relationship or the amount of trust and emotional connection they were able to achieve remotely. Preference for visit type can be influenced by in-person masking requirements impeding full facial expressions or expressing strong emotions over phone. All respondents expressed strong support for all modalities going forward. Counselors with broad experience across platforms should be the focus of future recruitment as should patient education around the nature of the genetic counseling visit and the accuracy of various testing options. Telegenetic programs should consider perspectives from all 3 groups to ensure that specific needs of each are addressed.</p>","PeriodicalId":54976,"journal":{"name":"Inquiry-The Journal of Health Care Organization Provision and Financing","volume":"62 ","pages":"469580251314747"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11758521/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Inquiry-The Journal of Health Care Organization Provision and Financing","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00469580251314747","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While telegenetic counseling has increased substantially since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, previous studies reported concerns around building rapport, nonverbal communication, and the patient-counselor relationship. This qualitative evaluation elicited feedback from genetic counselors, referring clinicians, and patients from a single healthcare organization to understand the user-driven reasons for overall satisfaction and experience. We conducted 22 in-depth, semi-structured interviews with participants from all 3 groups between February 2022 and February 2023. Interview recordings were transcribed and analyzed using a pragmatic thematic approach. Participants across all groups felt the style and content of the genetic counseling visit lent itself perfectly to telegenetics specifically because of no physical exam component. Most patient and counselor participants expressed having the genetic counseling over phone or video had no impact on the patient-counselor relationship or the amount of trust and emotional connection they were able to achieve remotely. Preference for visit type can be influenced by in-person masking requirements impeding full facial expressions or expressing strong emotions over phone. All respondents expressed strong support for all modalities going forward. Counselors with broad experience across platforms should be the focus of future recruitment as should patient education around the nature of the genetic counseling visit and the accuracy of various testing options. Telegenetic programs should consider perspectives from all 3 groups to ensure that specific needs of each are addressed.

COVID大流行后远程遗传咨询的可接受性和未来考虑因素:对遗传咨询师、临床医生和患者的采访。
虽然自2019冠状病毒病大流行开始以来,远程遗传咨询大幅增加,但之前的研究报告了对建立融洽关系、非语言沟通和患者与咨询师关系的担忧。这种定性评估从遗传咨询师、转诊临床医生和单个医疗保健组织的患者那里获得反馈,以了解用户驱动的总体满意度和体验的原因。我们在2022年2月至2023年2月期间对所有3组参与者进行了22次深入的半结构化访谈。访谈录音被转录并使用实用的主题方法进行分析。所有小组的参与者都认为遗传咨询访问的风格和内容非常适合远程遗传,特别是因为没有身体检查的组成部分。大多数患者和咨询师参与者表示,通过电话或视频进行遗传咨询对患者与咨询师的关系或他们能够远程实现的信任和情感联系的数量没有影响。对访问类型的偏好可能受到当面掩盖要求的影响,这些要求阻碍了完整的面部表情或在电话中表达强烈的情绪。所有答复者都表示大力支持今后的所有方式。具有广泛跨平台经验的咨询师应成为未来招聘的重点,同时也应围绕遗传咨询访问的性质和各种检测选择的准确性对患者进行教育。电视遗传节目应考虑所有三个群体的观点,以确保每个群体的具体需求得到解决。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
192
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: INQUIRY is a peer-reviewed open access journal whose msision is to to improve health by sharing research spanning health care, including public health, health services, and health policy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信