Physicians', pharmacists', and nurses' education of patients about antibiotic use and antimicrobial resistance in primary care settings: a qualitative systematic literature review.

Frontiers in antibiotics Pub Date : 2025-01-09 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.3389/frabi.2024.1507868
Lavinia Bianca Balea, Ragnhild J A Gulestø, Hongxuan Xu, Stinne Glasdam
{"title":"Physicians', pharmacists', and nurses' education of patients about antibiotic use and antimicrobial resistance in primary care settings: a qualitative systematic literature review.","authors":"Lavinia Bianca Balea, Ragnhild J A Gulestø, Hongxuan Xu, Stinne Glasdam","doi":"10.3389/frabi.2024.1507868","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Patients' adherence to antibiotic treatment and related prevention of AMR is significant. Understanding healthcare professionals' strategies for advising and educating patients in primary care settings is crucial.</p><p><strong>Aim: </strong>From the perspectives of professionals and patients, to explore how physicians, pharmacists, and nurses educate patients about antibiotic use and antimicrobial resistance in primary care settings.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A qualitative systematic literature review was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL Complete, Eric, SocINDEX, PsycInfo, Web of Science and Scopus. The study included 102 publications, followed PRISMA recommendations and was registered in PROSPERO (reg.no. CRD4202455761). The studies were screened and selected based on specific inclusion and exclusion criteria using Covidence. Quality appraisal followed the Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP) qualitative study checklist. Data were extracted, and the analysis consisted of a descriptive numerical summary analysis and a qualitative thematic analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analyzed studies spanned multiple countries and settings and included perspectives of primary care physicians, pharmacists, nurses and patients. Two main themes emerged: (1) Relationships between professionals and patients influenced educational strategies, showing that trust and rapport between healthcare professionals and patients played a crucial role in shaping educational strategies around antibiotic use; (2) The organizational structures challenged professionals in guiding and educating patients, highlighting how limited resources, time constraints, and system-level pressures hindered healthcare professionals' ability to provide consistent and effective education. Often, structural challenges led to not educating the patients on the risks of antibiotic misuse and antimicrobial resistance. The use of delayed prescriptions emerged as a strategy for improved AMR stewardship and to meet patients' expectations for antibiotic treatment, though it raised concerns about undermining professional responsibility and authority in ensuring appropriate antibiotic use.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Healthcare professionals' role in educating patients about antibiotic use and AMR in primary care settings was complex, with different challenges faced by nurses, pharmacists and primary care physicians. These challenges extended beyond the clinical level, including relational, social and structural factors. Power dynamics, trust issues, and time pressures often hindered effective education on antibiotic use. Addressing gaps in education on antibiotic use and AMR requires acknowledging these multifaceted challenges, with future efforts focusing on better supporting healthcare professionals in this context.</p><p><strong>Systematic review registration: </strong>https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD4202455761.</p>","PeriodicalId":73065,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in antibiotics","volume":"3 ","pages":"1507868"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11754411/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in antibiotics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/frabi.2024.1507868","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Patients' adherence to antibiotic treatment and related prevention of AMR is significant. Understanding healthcare professionals' strategies for advising and educating patients in primary care settings is crucial.

Aim: From the perspectives of professionals and patients, to explore how physicians, pharmacists, and nurses educate patients about antibiotic use and antimicrobial resistance in primary care settings.

Methods: A qualitative systematic literature review was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL Complete, Eric, SocINDEX, PsycInfo, Web of Science and Scopus. The study included 102 publications, followed PRISMA recommendations and was registered in PROSPERO (reg.no. CRD4202455761). The studies were screened and selected based on specific inclusion and exclusion criteria using Covidence. Quality appraisal followed the Critical Appraisal Skills Program (CASP) qualitative study checklist. Data were extracted, and the analysis consisted of a descriptive numerical summary analysis and a qualitative thematic analysis.

Results: The analyzed studies spanned multiple countries and settings and included perspectives of primary care physicians, pharmacists, nurses and patients. Two main themes emerged: (1) Relationships between professionals and patients influenced educational strategies, showing that trust and rapport between healthcare professionals and patients played a crucial role in shaping educational strategies around antibiotic use; (2) The organizational structures challenged professionals in guiding and educating patients, highlighting how limited resources, time constraints, and system-level pressures hindered healthcare professionals' ability to provide consistent and effective education. Often, structural challenges led to not educating the patients on the risks of antibiotic misuse and antimicrobial resistance. The use of delayed prescriptions emerged as a strategy for improved AMR stewardship and to meet patients' expectations for antibiotic treatment, though it raised concerns about undermining professional responsibility and authority in ensuring appropriate antibiotic use.

Conclusion: Healthcare professionals' role in educating patients about antibiotic use and AMR in primary care settings was complex, with different challenges faced by nurses, pharmacists and primary care physicians. These challenges extended beyond the clinical level, including relational, social and structural factors. Power dynamics, trust issues, and time pressures often hindered effective education on antibiotic use. Addressing gaps in education on antibiotic use and AMR requires acknowledging these multifaceted challenges, with future efforts focusing on better supporting healthcare professionals in this context.

Systematic review registration: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD4202455761.

医生、药剂师和护士对初级保健环境中抗生素使用和抗菌素耐药性患者的教育:一项定性系统文献综述。
背景:患者对抗生素治疗的依从性和相关的AMR预防意义重大。了解医疗保健专业人员在初级保健环境中为患者提供建议和教育的策略至关重要。目的:从专业人员和患者的角度,探讨医生、药剂师和护士如何在初级保健环境中对患者进行抗生素使用和抗微生物药物耐药性的教育。方法:在MEDLINE、EMBASE、CINAHL Complete、Eric、SocINDEX、PsycInfo、Web of Science、Scopus等数据库中进行定性系统文献综述。该研究包括102篇出版物,遵循PRISMA的建议,并在PROSPERO(注册号:no. 1)登记。CRD4202455761)。根据使用covid - ence的特定纳入和排除标准筛选和选择研究。质量评估遵循关键评估技能计划(CASP)定性研究清单。提取数据,分析包括描述性数值总结分析和定性专题分析。结果:所分析的研究跨越多个国家和环境,包括初级保健医生,药剂师,护士和患者的观点。出现了两个主要主题:(1)专业人员与患者之间的关系影响教育策略,表明卫生保健专业人员与患者之间的信任和融洽关系在形成围绕抗生素使用的教育策略方面发挥了至关重要的作用;(2)组织结构对专业人员指导和教育患者的能力提出了挑战,突出表明有限的资源、时间限制和系统层面的压力阻碍了专业人员提供一致和有效的教育的能力。通常,结构性挑战导致没有对患者进行抗生素滥用和抗菌素耐药性风险的教育。使用延迟处方是一种改进抗菌素耐药性管理和满足患者对抗生素治疗期望的策略,尽管它引起了人们对损害确保适当使用抗生素的专业责任和权威的担忧。结论:卫生保健专业人员在初级保健机构中对患者进行抗生素使用和抗生素耐药性教育的作用是复杂的,护士、药剂师和初级保健医生面临着不同的挑战。这些挑战超出了临床层面,包括关系、社会和结构因素。权力动态、信任问题和时间压力往往阻碍有效的抗生素使用教育。解决抗生素使用和抗菌素耐药性教育方面的差距需要承认这些多方面的挑战,未来的工作重点是在这方面更好地支持卫生保健专业人员。系统综述注册:https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/,标识符CRD4202455761。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信