A Proof-of-Concept Study of Ulipristal Acetate for Early Medication Abortion.

NEJM evidence Pub Date : 2025-02-01 Epub Date: 2025-01-23 DOI:10.1056/EVIDoa2400209
Beverly Winikoff, Manuel Bousiéguez, Jorge Salmerón, Karina Robles-Rivera, Sonia Hernández-Salazar, Angélica Martínez-Huitrón, María Laura García-Martínez, Lucía Aguirre-Antonio, Ilana G Dzuba
{"title":"A Proof-of-Concept Study of Ulipristal Acetate for Early Medication Abortion.","authors":"Beverly Winikoff, Manuel Bousiéguez, Jorge Salmerón, Karina Robles-Rivera, Sonia Hernández-Salazar, Angélica Martínez-Huitrón, María Laura García-Martínez, Lucía Aguirre-Antonio, Ilana G Dzuba","doi":"10.1056/EVIDoa2400209","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>The current regimen for early medication abortion in many countries is mifepristone and misoprostol, but mifepristone is relatively expensive and limited in many regions. Ulipristal acetate, with a similar chemical profile, might be an alternative. This proof-of-concept study evaluated ulipristal acetate and misoprostol for medication abortion through 63 days of gestation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a two-stage clinical study to choose an effective and acceptable ulipristal-misoprostol regimen. First, we undertook a dose-finding study. Sixty-six participants were randomly assigned to either 60 mg or 90 mg of oral ulipristal, followed by 800 μg of buccal misoprostol. Because the two groups had similar efficacy and safety profiles, we opted for the 60-mg ulipristal dose for an open-label study with 100 additional participants, resulting in a total of 133 participants using the same regimen. To evaluate acceptability, we applied a structured questionnaire at the end of the follow-up visit.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Pregnancy termination occurred with the combination of oral ulipristal 60 mg and buccal misoprostol 800 μg in 129 out of 133, or 97.0%, (95% confidence interval [CI], 94.1 to 99.9%), of participants. Among those for whom this regimen did not result in pregnancy termination, one participant had a completion with sharp curettage, two received manual vacuum aspiration, and one underwent a repeat medication abortion with misoprostol alone. Side effects included chills (77.4%; 95% CI, 70.3 to 84.5%), diarrhea (66.9%; 95% CI, 59.0 to 74.8%), and nausea (48.1%; 95% CI, 39.7 to 56.5%). No serious adverse events were reported. The regimen was deemed \"acceptable\" or \"highly acceptable\" by 97.7% (95% CI, 95.2 to 100.0%) of participants.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This study suggests that ulipristal acetate followed by misoprostol is an effective and acceptable medication abortion regimen with no reported serious adverse events. (This project is supported by the OPTions Initiative. The study registered as ISRCTN35625202.).</p>","PeriodicalId":74256,"journal":{"name":"NEJM evidence","volume":" ","pages":"EVIDoa2400209"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NEJM evidence","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1056/EVIDoa2400209","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/23 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The current regimen for early medication abortion in many countries is mifepristone and misoprostol, but mifepristone is relatively expensive and limited in many regions. Ulipristal acetate, with a similar chemical profile, might be an alternative. This proof-of-concept study evaluated ulipristal acetate and misoprostol for medication abortion through 63 days of gestation.

Methods: We conducted a two-stage clinical study to choose an effective and acceptable ulipristal-misoprostol regimen. First, we undertook a dose-finding study. Sixty-six participants were randomly assigned to either 60 mg or 90 mg of oral ulipristal, followed by 800 μg of buccal misoprostol. Because the two groups had similar efficacy and safety profiles, we opted for the 60-mg ulipristal dose for an open-label study with 100 additional participants, resulting in a total of 133 participants using the same regimen. To evaluate acceptability, we applied a structured questionnaire at the end of the follow-up visit.

Results: Pregnancy termination occurred with the combination of oral ulipristal 60 mg and buccal misoprostol 800 μg in 129 out of 133, or 97.0%, (95% confidence interval [CI], 94.1 to 99.9%), of participants. Among those for whom this regimen did not result in pregnancy termination, one participant had a completion with sharp curettage, two received manual vacuum aspiration, and one underwent a repeat medication abortion with misoprostol alone. Side effects included chills (77.4%; 95% CI, 70.3 to 84.5%), diarrhea (66.9%; 95% CI, 59.0 to 74.8%), and nausea (48.1%; 95% CI, 39.7 to 56.5%). No serious adverse events were reported. The regimen was deemed "acceptable" or "highly acceptable" by 97.7% (95% CI, 95.2 to 100.0%) of participants.

Conclusions: This study suggests that ulipristal acetate followed by misoprostol is an effective and acceptable medication abortion regimen with no reported serious adverse events. (This project is supported by the OPTions Initiative. The study registered as ISRCTN35625202.).

醋酸乌普利司司用于早期药物流产的概念验证研究。
背景:目前许多国家早期药物流产的方案是米非司酮和米索前列醇,但米非司酮价格相对昂贵,在许多地区受到限制。具有类似化学成分的醋酸Ulipristal可能是一种替代品。这项概念验证研究评估了醋酸乌普利司特和米索前列醇在妊娠63天内用于药物流产的效果。方法:我们进行了一项两期临床研究,以选择一种有效且可接受的乌普利司特-米索前列醇方案。首先,我们进行了一项剂量发现研究。66名参与者被随机分配服用60毫克或90毫克口服乌普利司坦,随后口服800微克米索前列醇。由于两组具有相似的疗效和安全性,我们选择了60mg ulipristal剂量进行开放标签研究,有100名额外的参与者,总共133名参与者使用相同的方案。为了评估可接受性,我们在随访结束时应用了一份结构化问卷。结果:133名参与者中有129名(95%可信区间[CI], 94.1至99.9%)在口服乌普利司妥60 mg和口服米索前列醇800 μg的情况下发生了妊娠终止。在该方案未导致终止妊娠的患者中,一名参与者完成了尖锐刮宫,两名接受了手动真空抽吸,一名接受了单独使用米索前列醇的重复药物流产。副作用包括寒战(77.4%);95% CI, 70.3 ~ 84.5%),腹泻(66.9%;95% CI, 59.0 - 74.8%),恶心(48.1%;95% CI, 39.7 ~ 56.5%)。无严重不良事件报告。97.7% (95% CI, 95.2 - 100.0%)的参与者认为该方案“可接受”或“高度可接受”。结论:本研究提示醋酸乌普利司特联合米索前列醇是一种有效且可接受的流产用药方案,无严重不良事件报道。(这个项目是由OPTions Initiative支持的。该研究注册号为ISRCTN35625202。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信